Advertisement

Acta Neurochirurgica

, Volume 157, Issue 10, pp 1807–1812 | Cite as

The Neck Disability Index (NDI) and its correlation with quality of life and mental health measures among patients with single-level cervical disc disease scheduled for surgery

  • J. SundsethEmail author
  • F. Kolstad
  • L. G. Johnsen
  • A. H. Pripp
  • O. P. Nygaard
  • H. Andresen
  • O. A. Fredriksli
  • E. Myrseth
  • M. Züchner
  • J. A. Zwart
Clinical Article - Spine

Abstract

Background

The Neck Disability Index (NDI) is widely used as a self-rated disability score in patients with cervical radiculopathy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the NDI score correlated with other assessments of quality of life and mental health in a specific group of patients with single-level cervical disc disease and corresponding radiculopathy.

Methods

One hundred thirty-six patients were included in a prospective, randomized controlled clinical multicenter study on one-level anterior cervical discectomy with arthroplasty (ACDA) versus one-level anterior cervical discectomy with fusion (ACDF). The preoperative data were obtained at hospital admission 1 to 3 days prior to surgery. The NDI score was used as the dependent variable and correlation as well as regression analyses were conducted to assess the relationship with the short form-36, EuroQol-5Dimension-3 level and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.

Results

The mean age at inclusion was 44.1 years (SD ±7.0, range 26–59 years), of which 46.3 % were male. Mean NDI score was 48.6 (SD = 12.3, minimum 30 and maximum 88). Simple linear regression analysis demonstrated a significant correlation between NDI and the EuroQol-5Dimension-3 level [R = -0.64, 95 % confidence interval (CI) -30.1– -19.8, p < 0.001] and to a lesser extent between NDI and the short form-36 physical component summary [R = -0.49, 95 % CI (-1.10– -0.58), p < 0.001] and the short form-36 mental component summary [R = -0.25, 95 % CI (-0.47– -0-09), p = 0.004]. Regarding NDI and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, a significant correlation for depression was found [R = 0.26, 95 % CI (0.21–1.73), p = 0.01]. Multiple linear regression analysis showed a statistically significant and the strongest correlation between NDI and the independent variables in the following order: EuroQol-5Dimension-3 level [R = -0.64, 95 % CI (-23.5– -7.9), p <0.001], short form-36 physical component summary [R = -0.41, 95 % CI (-0.93– -0.23), p = 0.001] and short form-36 mental component summary [R = -0.36, 95 % CI (-0.53– -0.15), p = 0.001].

Conclusion

The results from the present study show that the NDI correlated significantly with a different quality of life and mental health measures among patients with single-level cervical disc disease and corresponding radiculopathy.

Keywords

Cervical radiculopathy Neck Disability Index Quality of life Anxiety Depression 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Vigdis Skogli, Torun Gillebo, Jorund Roos, Camilla Seif and Monica Finkirk for efforts to convene the patients, coordination of investigations and follow-up of the study.

Conflict of interest

The study committee has received a grant from DePuy Synthes Spine (325 Paramount Drive Raynham, MA 02767) for the project to be completed. The study sponsor was not involved in the study design, conduct of the trial, or writing or review of the manuscript. The prostheses implanted were solely financed by the individual hospitals.

References

  1. 1.
    Brooks RG, Jendteg S, Lindgren B, Persson U, Björk S (1991) EuroQol: health-related quality of life measurement. Results of the Swedish questionnaire exercise. Health Policy 18:37–48CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Carreon LY, Bratcher KR, Das N, Nienhuis JB, Glassman SD (2014) Estimating EQ-5D values from the neck disability index and numeric rating scales for neck and arm pain. J Neurosurg Spine 6:1–6Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cohen JW (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Coric D, Nunley PD, Guyer RD, Musante D, Carmody CN, Gordon CR, Lauryssen C, Ohnmeiss DD, Boltes MO (2011) Prospective randomized, multicenter study of cervical arthroplasty: 269 patients from the Kineflex|C artificial disc investigational device exemption study with a minimum 2-year follow-up: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 15:348–358CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fairbank JCT, Couper J, Davies JB, O'Brien JP (1980) The Oswestry low back pain disability index. Physiotherapy 66:2713Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Garratt AM, Ruter DA, Abdalla MI, Buckingham JK, Russell IT (1993) The SF36 health survey questionnaire: an outcome measure suitable for routine use within the NHS. Br Med J 306:1440–1443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Grevitt M, Khazim R, Webb JK, Mulholland R, Shepperd J (1997) The short form-36 health survey questionnaire in spine surgery. Br J Bone Joint Surg 79:48–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Heller JG, Sasso RC, Papadopoulos SM, Anderson PA, Fessler RG, Hacker RJ, Coric D, Cauthen JC, Riew DK (2009) Comparison of BRYAN cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical decompression and fusion: clinical and radiographic results of a randomized, controlled clinical trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:101–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
    Jenkinson C, Coulter A, Wright L (1993) Short form 36 (SF36) health survey questionnaire: normative data for adults of working age. Br Med J 306:1437–1440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    McCarthy MJH, Grevitt MP, Silcocks P, Hobbs G (2007) The reliability of the Vernon and Mior neck disability index, and its validity compared with the short form-36 health survey questionnaire. Eur Spine J 16:2111–2117PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mummaneni PV, Burkus JK, Haid RW, Traynelis VC, Zdeblick TA (2007) Clinical and radiographic analysis of cervical disc arthroplasty compared with allograft fusion: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine 6:198–209CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Murrey D, Janssen M, Delamarter R, Goldstein J, Zigler J, Tay B, Darden B (2009) Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease. Spine J 9:275–286CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Peolsson A, Hedlund R, Vavruch L, Oberg B (2003) Predictive factors for the outcome of anterior cervical decompression and fusion. Eur Spine J 12:274–280PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Peolsson A, Peolsson M (2008) Predictive factors for long-term outcome of anterior cervical decompression and fusion: a multivariate data analysis. Eur Spine J 17:406–414PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Peolsson A, Vavruch L, Oberg B (2006) Predictive factors for arm pain, neck pain, neck specific disability and health after anterior cervical decompression and fusion. Acta Neurochir 148:167–173CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Radhakrishnan K, Litchy WJ, O′Fallon WM, Kurland LT (1994) Epidemiology of cervical radiculopathy. A population based study from Rochester, Minnesota, 1976 through 1990. Brain 117:325–335CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Riddle D, Stratford P (1998) Use of generic versus region-specific functional status measures on patients with cervical spine disorders. Phys Ther 78:951–963PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rodi RJ, Vernon H (2012) Cervical radiculopathy: a systematic review on treatment by spinal manipulation and measurement with the neck disability index. J Can Chiropr Assoc 56:18–28Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Salemi G, Savettieri G, Meneghini F, Di Benedetto ME, Ragonese P, Morgante L, Reggio A, Patti F, Grigoletto F, Di Perri R (1996) Prevalence of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy: a door-to-door survey in a Sicilian municipality. Acta Neurol Scand 93:184–188CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sampath P, Bendebba M, Davis JD, Ducker T (1999) Outcome in patients with cervical radiculopathy. Prospective multicenter study with independent clinical review. Spine 24:591–597CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sasso RC, Anderson PA, Riew KD, Heller JG (2011) Results of cervical arthroplasty compared with anterior discectomy and fusion: four-year clinical outcomes in a prospective, randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93:1684–1692CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    The EuroQol Group (1990) EuroQol-a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 16:199–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Vernon H, Mior S (1991) The Neck Disability Index: a study of reliability and validity. J Manip Physiol Ther 14:409–415Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ware JE, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF- 36). I: Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30:473–483CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wewers ME, Lowe NK (1990) A critical review of visual analogue scales in the measurement of clinical phenomena. Res Nurs Health 13:227–236CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wibault J, Oberg B, Löfgren H, Zsigmond P, Persson L, Peolsson A (2014) Individual factors associated with neck disability in patients with cervical radiculopathy scheduled for surgery: a study on physical impairments, psychosocial factors, and life style habits. Eur Spine J 23:599–605PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zigmond AS, Snaith RP (1983) The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 67:361–370CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zung WW (1965) A self-rating depression scale. Arch Gen Psychiatry 12:63–70CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Sundseth
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • F. Kolstad
    • 1
  • L. G. Johnsen
    • 3
  • A. H. Pripp
    • 4
  • O. P. Nygaard
    • 5
    • 6
  • H. Andresen
    • 5
  • O. A. Fredriksli
    • 6
    • 7
  • E. Myrseth
    • 8
  • M. Züchner
    • 1
  • J. A. Zwart
    • 2
    • 9
  1. 1.Department of NeurosurgeryOslo University Hospital RikshospitaletOsloNorway
  2. 2.Institute of Clinical MedicineUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
  3. 3.Neuroclinic, Center of Spinal Disorder and Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Clinic of Orthopaedics and Rheumatology, St. Olavs HospitalTrondheim University HospitalTrondheimNorway
  4. 4.Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Health EconomicsOslo University HospitalOsloNorway
  5. 5.National resource center for spinal disordersUniversity Hospital of Trondheim (St Olavs Hospital HF)TrondheimNorway
  6. 6.Department of NeurosurgeryUniversity Hospital of Trondheim (St Olavs Hospital HF)TrondheimNorway
  7. 7.University of TrondheimTrondheimNorway
  8. 8.Department of NeurosurgeryHaukeland University HospitalBergenNorway
  9. 9.Department of Neurology and FORMIOslo University Hospital UllevaalOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations