Acta Neurochirurgica

, Volume 157, Issue 9, pp 1533–1540 | Cite as

Perspectives of epilepsy surgery in resource-poor countries: a study in Georgia

  • Sofia Kasradze
  • Maia Alkhidze
  • Giorgi Lomidze
  • Giorgi Japaridze
  • Aleksander Tsiskaridze
  • Andro Zangaladze
Clinical Article - Functional



To identify patients with concordant seizure semiology, interictal epileptiform discharges on standard EEG and brain MRI changes to define the patients with pharmacoresistant epilepsy (PRE) who would be suitable for epilepsy surgery according to non-invasive protocol.


The medical records of the patients with epilepsy seen in Epilepsy Center of Institute of Neurology and Neuropsychology (ECINN) (Tbilisi, Georgia) were reviewed retrospectively. The diagnostic work-up included neurological examination, standard EEG, and MRI. The degree of concordance of the seizure semiology, EEG, and neuroimaging was used to determine the potential candidates for surgery. The probability of seizure freedom rate was estimated based on known predictive values of anatomical, electrophysiological, and semiological characteristics.


A total of 83 (25 %) patients met the criteria of PRE. Fourteen (17 %) patients had complete concordance of seizure semiology, MRI, and EEG. Out of these patients, 11 had mesial temporal sclerosis on MRI and three had focal cortical dysplasia (FCD). Estimated seizure-free surgical success rate in this group was 75–95 % without the need for further investigations. Out of 25 (30 %) non-lesional MRI cases, the concordance of seizure semiology and EEG was in nine patients with probable success rate up to 60 %. Thirteen patients (16 %) had discordant EEG and MRI data and were not suitable for surgery without further testing.


A significant portion of PRE patients with concordant anatomical, electrophysiological, and semiological characteristics can be treated surgically in resource-limited countries. Nevertheless, most patients will still require further investigation for proper localization of epileptogenic focus.


Pharmacoresistant epilepsy Surgical treatment Developing country 


  1. 1.
    Berg AT, Walczak T, Hirsch LJ, Spencer SS (1998) Multivariable prediction of seizure outcome one year after resective epilepsy surgery: development of a model with independent validation. Epilepsy Res 29:185–194CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Berg AT, Zelko FA, Levy SR, Testa FM (2012) Age at onset of epilepsy, pharmacoresistance, and cognitive outcomes: a prospective cohort study. Neurology 79:1384–1391PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boesebeck F, Schulz R, May T, Ebner A (2002) Lateralizing semiology predicts the seizure outcome after epilepsy surgery in the posterior cortex. Brain 125:2320–2331CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bonini F, Mc Gonigal A, Trebuchon A, Gavaret M, Bartolomei F, Giusiano B, Chauvel P (2014) Frontal lobe seizures: from clinical semiology to localization. Epilepsia 55:264–277CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Burkholder DB, Sulc V, Hoffman EM, Cascino GD, Britton JW, So EL, Marsh WR, Meyer FB, Van Gompel JJ, Giannini C, Wass CT, Watson RE Jr, Worrell GA (2014) Interictal scalp electroencephalography and intraoperative electrocorticography in magnetic resonance imaging–negative temporal lobe epilepsy surgery. JAMA Neurol 71:702–709PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Campos MG (2012) Epilepsy surgery in developing countries. Handb Clin Neurol 108:943–953CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Campos MG, Godoy J, Mesa MT, Torrealba G, Gejman R, Huete I (2000) Temporal lobe epilepsy surgery with limited resources: results and economic considerations. Epilepsia 41(4):S18–S21CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cascino GD, Trenerry MR, So EL, Sharbrough FW, Shin C, Lagerlund TD, Zupanc ML, Jack CR Jr (1996) Routin EEG and temporal lobe epilepsy: relation to long-term EEG monitoring, quantitative MRI, and operative outcome. Epilepsia 37(7):651–656CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Census (2015) Number of Population as of January 1, 2015 Accessed 12 May 2015
  10. 10.
    Commission of Classification and Terminology of the ILAE (1981) Proposal for revised clinical and electroencephalographic classification of epileptic seizures. Epilepsia 22:489–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dolezalová I, Brázdil M, Hermanová M, Janousová E, Kuba R (2014) Effect of partial drug withdrawal on the lateralization of interictal epileptiform discharges and its relationship to surgical outcome in patients with hippocampal sclerosis. Epilepsy Res 108:1406–1416CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dworetzky BA, Reinsberger C (2011) The role of the interictal EEG in selecting candidates for resective epilepsy surgery. Epilepsy Behav 20:167–171CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Engel J Jr (2014) Approaches to refractory epilepsy. Ann Indian Acad Neurol 17(1):S12–S17PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Engel J Jr, International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) (2001) A proposed diagnostic scheme for people with epileptic seizures and with epilepsy: report of the ILAE task force on classification and terminology. Epilepsia 42:796–803CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Foldvary-Schaefer N, Unnwongse K (2011) Localizing and lateralizing features of auras and seizures. Epilepsy Behav 20:160–166CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gilliam F, Faught E, Martin R, Bowling S, Bilir E, Thomas J, Kuzniecky R (2000) Predictive value of MRI-identified mesial temporal sclerosis for surgical outcome in temporal lobe epilepsy: an intent-to-treat analysis. Epilepsia 41(8):963–966CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jeha LE, Najm I, Bingaman W, Dinner D, Widdess-Walsh P, Luders H (2007) Surgical outcome and prognostic factors of frontal lobe epilepsy surgery. Brain 130:574–584CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kwan P, Arzimanoglou A, Berg AT, Brodie MJ, Allen Hauser W, Mathern G, Moshé SL, Perucca E, Wiebe S, French J (2010) Definition of drug-resistant epilepsy: consensus proposal by the ad hoc Task Force of the ILAE Commission on Therapeutic Strategies. Epilepsia 51:1069–1077CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kwan P, Schachter SC, Brodie MJ (2011) Drug-resistant epilepsy. N Engl J Med 369:919–926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Laxer KD, Trinka E, Hirsch LJ, Cendes F, Langfitt J, Delanty N, Resnick T, Benbadis SR (2014) The consequences of refractory epilepsy and its treatment. Epilepsy Behav 37:59–70CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lomidze G, Kasradze S, Kvernadze D, Okujava N, Toidze O, de Boer HM, Dua T, Sander JW (2012) The prevalence and treatment gap of epilepsy in Tbilisi, Georgia. Epilepsy Res 98(2–3):123–129CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mc Gonigal A, Chauvel P (2004) Frontal lobe epilepsy: seizure semiology and presurgical evaluation. Pract Neurol 4:260–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mosewich RK, So EL, O’Brien TJ, Cascino GD, Sharbrough FW, Marsh WR, Meyer FB, Jack CR, O’Brien PC (2000) Factors predictive of the outcome of frontal lobe epilepsy surgery. Epilepsia 41:843–849CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Noe K, Sulc V, Wong-Kisiel L, Wirrell E, Van Gompel JJ, Wetjen N, Britton J, So E, Cascino GD, Marsh WR, Meyer F, Horinek D, Giannini C, Watson R, Brinkmann BH, Stead M, Worrel GA (2013) Long-term outcomes after nonlesional extratemporal lobe epilepsy surgery. JAMA Neurol 70:1003–1008PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ngugi AK, Bottomley C, Kleinschmidt I, Sander JW, Newton CR (2010) Estimation of the burden of active and life-time epilepsy: a meta-analytic approach. Epilepsia 51:883–890PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ngugi AK, Kariuki SM, Bottomley C, Kleinschmidt I, Sander JW, Newton CR (2011) Incidence of epilepsy—a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurology 77:1005–1012PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Radhakrishnan K, So EL, Silbert PL, Jack CR Jr, Cascino GD, Sharbrough FW, O’Brien PC (1998) Predictors of outcome of anterior temporal lobectomy for intractable epilepsy: a multivariate study. Neurology 51:465–471CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Schmidt D, Stavem K (2009) Long-term seizure outcome of surgery versus no surgery for drug-resistant partial epilepsy: a review of controlled studies. Epilepsia 50:1301–1309CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Semah F, Picot MC, Adam C, Broglin D, Arzimanoglou A, Bazin B, Cavalcanti D, Baulac M (1998) Is the underlying cause of epilepsy a major prognostic factor for recurrence? Neurology 51:1256–1262CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Spooner CG, Berkovic SF, Mitchell LA, Wrennall JA, Harvey AS (2006) New-onset temporal lobe epilepsy in children: lesion on MRI predicts poor seizure outcome. Neurology 67(12):2147–2153CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tatum WO, Benbadis SR, Hussain A, Al-Saadis S, Kaminski B, Heriaud LS, Fl V (2008) Ictal EEG remains the prominent predictor of seizure-free outcome after temporal lobectomy in epileptic patients with normal brain MRI. Seizure 17:631–636CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Téllez-Zenteno JF, Hernández Ronquillo L, Moien-Afshari F, Wiebe S (2010) Surgical outcomes in lesional and non-lesional epilepsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Epilepsy Res 89:310–318CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tonini C, Beghi E, Berg AT, Bogliun G, Giordano, Newton RW, Tetto A, Vitelli E, Vitezic D, Wiebe S (2004) Predictors of epilepsy surgery outcome: a meta-analysis. Epilepsy Res 62:75–87CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wassenaar M, Leijten FSS, Egberts TCG, Moons KGM, Uijl SG (2013) Prognostic factors for medically intractable epilepsy: a systematic review. Epilepsy Res 106:301–310CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sofia Kasradze
    • 1
  • Maia Alkhidze
    • 1
    • 2
  • Giorgi Lomidze
    • 1
  • Giorgi Japaridze
    • 1
  • Aleksander Tsiskaridze
    • 2
  • Andro Zangaladze
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute of Neurology and NeuropsychologyTbilisiGeorgia
  2. 2.Iv. Javakhishvili Tbilisi State UniversityTbilisiGeorgia
  3. 3.Virtua NeuroscienceVoorheesUSA

Personalised recommendations