Advertisement

Acta Neurochirurgica

, Volume 157, Issue 2, pp 305–309 | Cite as

Prospective comparison of simple suturing and elevation debridement in compound depressed fractures with no significant mass effect

  • Kanchan K. Mukherjee
  • Sivashanmugam Dhandapani
  • Alok C. Sarda
  • Manjul Tripathi
  • Pravin Salunke
  • Anand Srinivasan
  • Manoj K. Tewari
  • Suresh N. Mathuriya
Clinical Article - Brain Injury

Abstract

Background

Compound depressed fractures have conventionally been managed surgically with elevation and debridement to avoid infection, especially when there is dural penetration, nonetheless with little evidence. This study was to prospectively compare outcomes after simple suturing and elevation debridement in patients with compound depressed fractures.

Methods

Patients of compound depressed fracture with GCS of five or more, no serious systemic injury, and no significant mass effect were prospectively studied for various factors in relation to infection, hospital stay, survival, and late post-traumatic seizures. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using SPSS21.

Results

Of the total 232 patients with complete clinico-radiological and follow-up data, 183 underwent simple cleansing and suturing, and 49 underwent surgical elevation debridement. The surgical group at baseline had significantly lower GCS, greater dural violation, and brain matter herniation compared to the conservative arm. Univariate analysis showed simple suturing group to have significantly shorter hospital stay (2.4 vs. 10.3 days) (p < 0.001), lesser infection among survivors (4 vs. 21 %) (p = 0.001), and greater ‘survival with no infection’ (85 vs. 69 %) (p = 0.01). Multivariate analysis adjusting for age, sex, GCS, dural penetration, and surgical intervention confirmed significantly shorter hospital stay (p < 0.001) and lesser infection among survivors (p = 0.02) in the simple suturing group. Overall, there was no benefit offered by surgical debridement. Simple suturing had a better outcome in most subgroups, except in those with brain matter herniation and GCS 5–8, which showed non-significant benefit with surgical intervention.

Conclusions

Simple suturing seems to be an equally good option in patients with compound depressed fracture with no significant mass effect or brain matter herniation.

Keywords

Compound depressed fracture Simple suturing Elevation debridement Infection Outcome Survival Seizure Hospital stay 

Notes

Conflict of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Bullock MR, Chesnut R, Ghajar J, Gordon D, Hartl R, Newell DW, Servadei F, Walters BC, Wilberger J, Surgical Management of Traumatic Brain Injury Author Group (2006) Surgical management of depressed cranial fractures. Neurosurgery 58(3 Suppl):S56–S60PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cooper PR (1993) Skull fracture and traumatic cerebrospinal fluid fistulas. In: Cooper PR (ed) Head injury, 3rd edn. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 115–136Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Braakman R (1972) Depressed skull fracture: data, treatment, and follow-up in 225 consecutive cases. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 35:395–402PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Heary RF, Hunt CD, Krieger AJ, Schulder M, Vaid C (1993) Nonsurgical treatment of compound depressed skull fractures. J Trauma 35:441–447PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jennett B, Miller JD (1972) Infection after depressed fracture of skull. Implications for management of nonmissile injuries. J Neurosurg 36:333–339PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jennett B, Miller JD, Braakman R (1974) Epilepsy after monmissile depressed skull fracture. J Neurosurg 41:208–216PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mendelow AD, Campbell D, Tsementzis SA, Cowie RA, Harris P, Durie TB, Gillingham FJ (1983) Prophylactic antimicrobial management of compound depressed skull fracture. J R Coll Surg Edinb 28:80–83PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rehman L, Ghani E, Hussain A, Shah A, Noman MA, Khaleeq-Uz-Zaman (2007) Infection in compound depressed fracture of the skull. J Coll Phys Surg Pak 17:140–143Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shokunbi MT, Komolafe EO, Malomo AO, Amanor-Boadu DS, Sanusi A, Olumide AA, Adeloye A (2000) Scalp closure without fracture elevation does not reduce the risk of infection in patients with compound depressed skull fractures. Afr J Med Med Sci 29:293–296PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Steinbok P, Flodmark O, Martens D, Germann ET (1987) Management of simple depressed skull fractures in children. J Neurosurg 66:506–510PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    van den Heever CM, van der Merwe DJ (1989) Management of depressed skull fractures. Selective conservative management of nonmissile injuries. J Neurosurg 71:186–190PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wylen EL, Willis BK, Nanda A (1999) Infection rate with replacement of bone fragment in compound depressed skull fractures. Surg Neurol 51:452–457PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Teasdale G, Jennett B (1974) Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness: a practical scale. Lancet 2:81–84PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dhandapani SS, Manju D, Sharma BS, Mahapatra AK (2007) Clinical malnutrition in severe traumatic brain injury: factors associated and outcome at 6 months. Ind J Neurotrauma 4:35–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Atta HM (1999) Edwin Smith surgical papyrus: the oldest known surgical treatise. Am Surg 65:1190–1192PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Prioreschi P (1993) Skull trauma in Egyptian and Hippocratic medicine. Gesnerus 50:167–178PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cushing H (1917) A study of a series of wounds involving the brain and its enveloping structures. Br J Surg 5:558–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dhandapani S, Sharma A, Sharma K, Das L (2014) Comparative evaluation of MRS and SPECT in prognostication of patients with mild to moderate head injury. J Clin Neurosci 21:745–750Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dhandapani SS, Manju D, Vivekanandhan S, Agarwal M, Mahapatra AK (2010) Prospective longitudinal study of biochemical changes in critically ill patients with severe traumatic brain injury: factors associated and outcome at 6 months. Ind J Neurotrauma 7:23–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ali B, Ghosh A (2002) Antibiotics in compound depressed skull fractures. Emerg Med J 19:552–553PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kanchan K. Mukherjee
    • 1
  • Sivashanmugam Dhandapani
    • 1
  • Alok C. Sarda
    • 1
  • Manjul Tripathi
    • 1
  • Pravin Salunke
    • 1
  • Anand Srinivasan
    • 1
  • Manoj K. Tewari
    • 1
  • Suresh N. Mathuriya
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of NeurosurgeryPost Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER)ChandigarhIndia

Personalised recommendations