Acta Neurochirurgica

, Volume 157, Issue 3, pp 351–359 | Cite as

Comparison of indocyanine green fluorescent angiography to digital subtraction angiography in brain arteriovenous malformation surgery

  • Christopher J. Bilbao
  • Tarun Bhalla
  • Shamsher Dalal
  • Hiren Patel
  • Amir R. Dehdashti
Clinical Article - Vascular
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Background

The potential utility of intraoperative microscope-integrated indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence angiography in the surgery of brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) and evaluation of the completeness of resection is debatable. Postoperative catheter angiography is considered the gold standard. We evaluated the value of ICG and intraoperative catheter angiography in this setting.

Methods

Between January 2009 and July 2013, 37 patients with brain AVMs underwent surgical resection of their vascular lesions. ICG videoangiography and an intraoperative catheter angiography were performed in 32 cases, and a routine postoperative angiogram was performed within 48 h to 2 weeks after surgery. The usefulness of ICG findings and the ability to confirm total resection and to identify residual nidus or persistent shunt were assessed and compared to intraoperative and postoperative digital subtraction angiography, respectively.

Results

There were 7 grade 1, 11 grade 2, 11 grade 3 and 3 grade 4 Spetzler-Martin classification AVMs. ICG angiography helped to distinguish AVM vessels in 26 patients. In 31 patients, it demonstrated that there was no residual shunting. In one patient, a residual AVM was identified and further resected. Intraoperative catheter angiography detected two additional small residuals that were missed by ICG angiography, both deep in the surgical cavity. Further resection of the AVM was performed, and total resection was confirmed by a repeat intraoperative angiogram. Postoperative angiography in a patient with a grade 4 lesion revealed one additional small deep residual AVM nidus with persistent late shunting missed on both ICG and intraoperative angiography. Overall ICG angiography missed three out of four residual AVMs after initial resection, while the intraoperative angiogram missed one.

Conclusion

Although ICG angiography is a helpful adjunct in the surgery of some brain AVMs, it’s yield in detecting residual AVM nidus or shunt is low, especially for deep-seated lesions and higher grade AVMs. ICG angiography should not be used as a sole and/or reliable technique. High-resolution postoperative angiography must be performed in brain AVM surgery and remains the best test to confidently confirm complete AVM resection.

Keywords

Brain arteriovenous malformation Fluorescence angiography Indocyanine green videoangiography Catheter angiography Intraoperative 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Conflicts of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Alander JT, Kaartinen I, Laakso A, Patila T, Spillmann T, Tuchin VV, Venermo M, Välisuo P (2012) A review of indocyanine green fluorescent imaging in surgery. Int J Biomed Imaging 2012:940585CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anegawa S, Hayashi T, Torigoe R, Harada K, Kihara S (1994) Intraoperative angiography in the resection of arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg 80:73–78CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Balamurugan S, Agrawal A, Kato Y, Sano H (2011) Intra operative indocyanine green video-angiography in cerebrovascular surgery: an overview with review of literature. Asian J Neurosurg 6:88–93CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barrow DL, Boyer KL, Joseph GJ (1992) Intraoperative angiography in the management of neurovascular disorders. Neurosurgery 30:153–159CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bauer BL (1984) Intraoperative angiography in cerebral aneurysm and AV-malformation. Neurosurg Rev 7:209–217CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dashti R, Laakso A, Niemela M, Porras M, Hernesniemi J (2009) Microscope-integrated near-infrared indocyanine green videoangiography during surgery of intracranial aneurysms: the Helsinki experience. Surg Neurol 71:543–550, discussion 550CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dehdashti AR, Thines L, Da Costa LB, terBrugge KG, Willinsky RA, Wallace MC, Tymianski M (2009) Intraoperative biplanar rotational angiography during neurovascular surgery. Technical note. J Neurosurg 111:188–192CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Faber F, Thon N, Fesl G, Rachinger W, Guckler R, Tonn JC, Schichor C (2011) Enhanced analysis of intracerebral arterioveneous malformations by the intraoperative use of analytical indocyanine green videoangiography: technical note. Acta Neurochir 153:2181–2187CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Feindel W, Yamamoto YL, Hodge CP (1967) Intracarotid fluorescein angiography: a new method for examination of the epicerebral circulation in man. Can Med Assoc J 96:1–7PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ghosh S, Levy ML, Stanley P, Nelson M, Giannotta SL, McComb JG (1999) Intraoperative angiography in the management of pediatric vascular disorders. Pediatr Neurosurg 30:16–22CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hanggi D, Etminan N, Steiger HJ (2010) The impact of microscope-integrated intraoperative near-infrared indocyanine green videoangiography on surgery of arteriovenous malformations and dural arteriovenous fistulae. Neurosurgery 67:1094–1103, discussion 1103–1094CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Killory BD, Nakaji P, Gonzales LF, Ponce FA, Wait SD, Spetzler RF (2009) Prospective evaluation of surgical microscope-integrated intraoperative near-infrared indocyanine green angiography during cerebral arteriovenous malformation surgery. Neurosurgery 65:456–462, discussion 462CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ng YP, King NK, Wan KR, Wang E, Ng I (2013) Uses and limitations of indocyanine green videoangiography for flow analysis in arteriovenous malformation surgery. J Clin Neurosci 20:224–232CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Raabe A, Nakaji P, Beck J, Kim LJ, Hsu FP, Kamerman JD, Seifert V, Spetzler RF (2005) Prospective evaluation of surgical microscope-integrated intraoperative near-infrared indocyanine green videoangiography during aneurysm surgery. J Neurosurg 103:982–989CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Solomon RA, Connolly ES Jr, Prestigiacomo CJ, Khandji AG, Pile-Spellman J (2000) Management of residual dysplastic vessels after cerebral arteriovenous malformation resection: implications for postoperative angiography. Neurosurgery 46:1052–1060CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Taddei G, Tommasi CD, Ricci A, Galzio RJ (2011) Arteriovenous malformations and intraoperative indocyanine green videoangiography: preliminary experience. Neurol India 59:97–100CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Takagi Y, Kikuta K, Nozaki K, Sawamura K, Hashimoto N (2007) Detection of a residual nidus by surgical microscope-integrated intraoperative near-infrared indocyanine green videoangiography in a child with a cerebral arteriovenous malformation. J Neurosurg 107:416–418CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zaidi HA, Abla AA, Nakaji P, Chowdhry SA, Albuquerque FC, Spetzler RF (2014) Indocyanine green angiography in the surgical management of cerebral arteriovenous malformations: lessons learned in 130 consecutive cases. Neurosurgery 10(Suppl 2):246–251CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christopher J. Bilbao
    • 1
  • Tarun Bhalla
    • 2
  • Shamsher Dalal
    • 2
  • Hiren Patel
    • 1
  • Amir R. Dehdashti
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of NeurosurgeryPhiladelphia College of Osteopathic MedicinePhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.Department of NeurosurgeryGeisinger Medical CenterDanvilleUSA
  3. 3.Department of NeurosurgeryNorth Shore University HospitalManhassetUSA

Personalised recommendations