Advertisement

Acta Neurochirurgica

, Volume 156, Issue 4, pp 777–785 | Cite as

Non-assisted versus neuro-navigated and XperCT-guided external ventricular catheter placement: a comparative cadaver study

  • Oliver P. GautschiEmail author
  • N. R. Smoll
  • M. Kotowski
  • B. Schatlo
  • M. Tosic
  • B. Stimec
  • J. Fasel
  • K. Schaller
  • P. Bijlenga
Experimental research - Neurosurgery Training

Abstract

Background and purpose

Accurate placement of an external ventricular drain (EVD) for the treatment of hydrocephalus is of paramount importance for its functionality and in order to minimize morbidity and complications. The aim of this study was to compare two different drain insertion assistance tools with the traditional free-hand anatomical landmark method, and to measure efficacy, safety and precision.

Methods

Ten cadaver heads were prepared by opening large bone windows centered on Kocher’s points on both sides. Nineteen physicians, divided in two groups (trainees and board certified neurosurgeons) performed EVD insertions. The target for the ventricular drain tip was the ipsilateral foramen of Monro. Each participant inserted the external ventricular catheter in three different ways: 1) free-hand by anatomical landmarks, 2) neuronavigation-assisted (NN), and 3) XperCT-guided (XCT). The number of ventricular hits and dangerous trajectories; time to proceed; radiation exposure of patients and physicians; distance of the catheter tip to target and size of deviations projected in the orthogonal plans were measured and compared.

Results

Insertion using XCT increased the probability of ventricular puncture from 69.2 to 90.2 % (p = 0.02). Non-assisted placements were significantly less precise (catheter tip to target distance 14.3 ± 7.4 mm versus 9.6 ± 7.2 mm, p = 0.0003). The insertion time to proceed increased from 3.04 ± 2.06 min. to 7.3 ± 3.6 min. (p < 0.001). The X-ray exposure for XCT was 32.23 mSv, but could be reduced to 13.9 mSv if patients were initially imaged in the hybrid-operating suite. No supplementary radiation exposure is needed for NN if patients are imaged according to a navigation protocol initially.

Conclusion

This ex vivo study demonstrates a significantly improved accuracy and safety using either NN or XCT-assisted methods. Therefore, efforts should be undertaken to implement these new technologies into daily clinical practice. However, the accuracy versus urgency of an EVD placement has to be balanced, as the image-guided insertion technique will implicate a longer preparation time due to a specific image acquisition and trajectory planning.

Keywords

External ventricular drain Accuracy Anatomical landmarks Neuronavigation Real-time insertion technique 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank all participating surgeons: S. Momjian, Y. El Hassani, I. Radovanovic, M. Jägersgerg, H. Becker, A. Bartoli, A. Kurzburch, M. Seek, A. Reverdin, and B. Rilliet for their valuable contribution. Special thanks also to Mr T. Gerken and Mrs L. Slegers from Brainlab and Philips for their expertise.

Conflict of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Azeem SS, Origitano TC (2007) Ventricular catheter placement with a frameless neuronavigational system: a 1-year experience. Neurosurgery 60:243–248PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bauer DF, Razdan SN, Bartolucci AA, Markert JM (2011) Meta-analysis of hemorrhagic complications from ventriculostomy placement by neurosurgeons. Neurosurgery 69:255–260PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Binz DD, Toussaint LG 3rd, Friedman JA (2009) Hemorrhagic complications of ventriculostomy placement: a meta-analysis. Neurocrit Care 10:253–256PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Clark S, Sangra M, Hayhurst C, Kandasamy J, Jenkinson M, Lee M, Mallucci C (2008) The use of noninvasive electromagnetic neuronavigation for slit ventricle syndrome and complex hydrocephalus in a pediatric population. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2:430–434PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dey M, Jaffe J, Stadnik A, Awad IA (2012) External ventricular drainage for intraventricular hemorrhage. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 12:24–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dickerman RD, McConathy WJ, Morgan J, Stevens QE, Jolley JT, Schneider S, Mittler MA (2005) Failure rate of frontal versus parietal approaches for proximal catheter placement in ventriculoperitoneal shunts: revisited. J Clin Neurosci 12:781–783PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Friedman WA, Vries JK (1980) Percutaneous tunnel ventriculostomy. Summary of 100 procedures. J Neurosurg 53:662–665PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gil Z, Siomin V, Beni-Adani L, Sira B, Constantini S (2002) Ventricular catheter placement in children with hydrocephalus and small ventricles: the use of a frameless neuronavigation system. Childs Nerv Syst 18:26–29PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hermann EJ, Capelle HH, Tschan CA, Krauss JK (2012) Electromagnetic-guided neuronavigation for safe placement of intraventricular catheters in pediatric neurosurgery. J Neurosurg Pediatr 10:327–333PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Huyette DR, Turnbow BJ, Kaufman C, Vaslow DF, Whiting BB, Oh MY (2008) Accuracy of the freehand pass technique for ventriculostomy catheter placement: retrospective assessment using computed tomography scans. J Neurosurg 108:88–91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jakola AS, Reinertsen I, Selbekk T, Solheim O, Lindseth F, Gulati S, Unsgard G (2013) Three-dimensional ultrasound-guided placement of ventricular catheters. World Neurosurg S1878–8750(13)01008–5. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2013.08.021
  12. 12.
    Kakarla UK, Kim LJ, Chang SW, Theodore N, Spetzler RF (2008) Safety and accuracy of bedside external ventricular drain placement. Neurosurgery 63:ONS162–ONS167PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Keric N, Neulen A, Kantelhardt SR, Giese A (2013) Image-guided implantation of pre-calibrated catheters in the ICU: a feasibility study. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 155:1781–1786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kim JH, Desai NS, Ricci J, Stieg PE, Rosengart AJ, Hartl R, Fraser JF (2012) Factors contributing to ventriculostomy infection. World Neurosurg 77:135–140PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Krombach G, Ganser A, Fricke C, Rohde V, Reinges M, Gilsbach J, Spetzger U (2000) Virtual placement of frontal ventricular catheters using frameless neuronavigation: an “unbloody training” for young neurosurgeons. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 43:171–175PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Levitt MR, O’Neill BR, Ishak GE, Khanna PC, Temkin NR, Ellenbogen RG, Ojemann JG, Browd SR (2012) Image-guided cerebrospinal fluid shunting in children: catheter accuracy and shunt survival. J Neurosurg Pediatr 10:112–117PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mahan M, Spetzler RF, Nakaji P (2013) Electromagnetic stereotactic navigation for external ventricular drain placement in the intensive care unit. J Clin Neurosci 20:1718–1722PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Morgan T, Awad I, Keyl P, Lane K, Hanley D (2008) Preliminary report of the clot lysis evaluating accelerated resolution of intraventricular hemorrhage (CLEAR-IVH) clinical trial. Acta Neurochir Suppl 105:217–220PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    O’Leary ST, Kole MK, Hoover DA, Hysell SE, Thomas A, Shaffrey CI (2000) Efficacy of the Ghajar Guide revisited: a prospective study. J Neurosurg 92:801–803PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    O’Neill BR, Velez DA, Braxton EE, Whiting D, Oh MY (2008) A survey of ventriculostomy and intracranial pressure monitor placement practices. Surg Neurol 70:268–273PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Patil V, Lacson R, Vosburgh KG, Wong JM, Prevedello L, Andriole K, Mukundan S, Popp AJ, Khorasani R (2013) Factors associated with external ventricular drain placement accuracy: data from an electronic health record repository. Acta Neurochir 155:1773–1779PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Reinertsen I, Jakola AS, Friderichsen P, Lindseth F, Solheim O, Selbekk T, Unsgard G (2012) A new system for 3D ultrasound-guided placement of cerebral ventricle catheters. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 7:151–157PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sainte-Rose C, Piatt JH, Renier D, Pierre-Kahn A, Hirsch JF, Hoffman HJ, Humphreys RP, Hendrick EB (1991) Mechanical complications in shunts. Pediatr Neurosurg 17:2–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sampath R, Wadhwa R, Tawfik T, Nanda A, Guthikonda B (2012) Stereotactic placement of ventricular catheters: does it affect proximal malfunction rates? Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 90:97–103PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Stieglitz LH, Giordano M, Samii M, Luedemann WO (2010) A new tool for frameless stereotactic placement of ventricular catheters. Neurosurgery 67:ons131–ons135PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Thomale UW, Knitter T, Schaumann A, Ahmadi SA, Ziegler P, Schulz M, Miethke C (2013) Smartphone-assisted guide for the placement of ventricular catheters. Childs Nerv Syst 29:131–139PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Toma AK, Camp S, Watkins LD, Grieve J, Kitchen ND (2009) External ventricular drain insertion accuracy: is there a need for change in practice? Neurosurgery 65:1197–1200PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Villavicencio AT, Leveque JC, McGirt MJ, Hopkins JS, Fuchs HE, George TM (2003) Comparison of revision rates following endoscopically versus nonendoscopically placed ventricular shunt catheters. Surg Neurol 59:375–380PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Whitehead WE, Jea A, Vachhrajani S, Kulkarni AV, Drake JM (2007) Accurate placement of cerebrospinal fluid shunt ventricular catheters with real-time ultrasound guidance in older children without patent fontanelles. J Neurosurg 107:406–410PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wilson TJ, Stetler WR Jr, Al-Holou WN, Sullivan SE (2013) Comparison of the accuracy of ventricular catheter placement using freehand placement, ultrasonic guidance, and stereotactic neuronavigation. J Neurosurg 119:66–70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Woernle CM, Burkhardt JK, Bellut D, Krayenbuehl N, Bertalanffy H (2011) Do iatrogenic factors bias the placement of external ventricular catheters?–a single institute experience and review of the literature. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 51:180–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Woodworth GF, McGirt MJ, Elfert P, Sciubba DM, Rigamonti D (2005) Frameless stereotactic ventricular shunt placement for idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 83:12–16PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Oliver P. Gautschi
    • 1
    Email author
  • N. R. Smoll
    • 1
  • M. Kotowski
    • 1
  • B. Schatlo
    • 1
    • 2
  • M. Tosic
    • 3
  • B. Stimec
    • 4
  • J. Fasel
    • 4
  • K. Schaller
    • 1
  • P. Bijlenga
    • 1
  1. 1.Service de Neurochirurgie, Département de Neurosciences cliniques, Faculté de MédecineHôpitaux Universitaires de GenèveGenevaSwitzerland
  2. 2.Department of NeurosurgeryGeorg-August-University of GöttingenGöttingenGermany
  3. 3.Institut de RadiophysiqueCentre Hospitalier Universitaire VaudoisLausanneSwitzerland
  4. 4.Anatomie clinique, Départment de physiologie cellulaire et métabolismeFaculté de MédecineGenevaSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations