The complications and the position of the Codman MicroSensor™ ICP device: an analysis of 549 patients and 650 Sensors
- 582 Downloads
Complications of and insertion depth of the Codman MicroSensor ICP monitoring device (CMS) is not well studied.
To study complications and the insertion depth of the CMS in a clinical setting.
We identified all patients who had their intracranial pressure (ICP) monitored using a CMS device between 2002 and 2010. The medical records and post implantation computed tomography (CT) scans were analyzed for occurrence of infection, hemorrhage and insertion depth.
In all, 549 patients were monitored using 650 CMS. Mean monitoring time was 7.0 ± 4.9 days. The mean implantation depth was 21.3 ± 11.1 mm (0–88 mm). In 27 of the patients, a haematoma was identified; 26 of these were less than 1 ml, and one was 8 ml. No clinically significant bleeding was found. There was no statistically significant increase in the number of hemorrhages in presumed coagulopathic patients. The infection rate was 0.6 % and the calculated infection rate per 1,000 catheter days was 0.8.
The risk for hemorrhagic and infectious complications when using the CMS for ICP monitoring is low. The depth of insertion varies considerably and should be taken into account if patients are treated with head elevation, since the pressure is measured at the tip of the sensor. To meet the need for ICP monitoring, an intraparenchymal ICP monitoring device should be preferred to the use of an external ventricular drainage (EVD).
KeywordICP monitoring Complications Position Codman MicroSensor
Conflicts of interest
Financial support was received from the regional agreement between Umeå University and Västerbotten County Council on cooperation in the fields of Medicine, Odontology, and Health (ALF), and the Department of Neurosurgery at the Umeå university hospital is acknowledged. The authors and the institution have no financial interest in the materials and devices described in this report.
- 1.Lundberg N (1960) Continuous recording and control of ventricular fluid pressure in neurosurgical practice. Acta Psychiatr Scand 36:1–193Google Scholar
- 11.Gopinath SP, Robertson CS, Narayan RK, Grossman RG (1994) Evaluation of a MicroSensor intracranial pressure transducer in head injured patients. In: Nagai H, Ishii S, Maeda M (eds) ICP IX. Springer Verlat, Berlin, pp 2–4Google Scholar
- 12.Marmarou A, Tsuji O, Dunbar J (1994) Experimental evaluation of a new solid state ICP monitor. In: Nagai H, Ishii S, Maeda M (eds) ICP IX. Springer, Berlin, pp 15–18Google Scholar
- 17.Vaquero J, Fontana RJ, Larson AM, Bass NM, Davern TJ, Shakil AO, Han S, Harrison ME, Stravitz TR, Munoz S, Brown R, Lee WM, Blei AT (2005) Complications and use of intracranial pressure monitoring in patients with acute liver failure and severe encephalopathy. Liver Transpl 11:1581–1589PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Bratton SL, Chestnut RM, Ghajar J, McConnell Hammond FF, Harris OA, Hartl R, Manley GT, Nemecek A, Newell DW, Rosenthal G, Schouten J, Shutter L, Timmons SD, Ullman JS, Videtta W, Wilberger JE, Wright DW (2007) Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. VII. Intracranial pressure monitoring technology. J Neurotrauma 24(Suppl 1):S45–S54PubMedGoogle Scholar