Patients with idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia have a sharper-than-normal trigeminal-pontine angle and trigeminal nerve atrophy
- 322 Downloads
Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is primarily diagnosed by symptoms and patient history. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging can be helpful in visualizing the neurovascular compression of the trigeminal nerve in TN patients, but the current parameters used as diagnostic markers for TN are less than optimal. The aim of this study is to assess whether the angle between the trigeminal nerve and the pons (the trigeminal-pontine angle) on the affected side of patients with idiopathic TN differs from that of the unaffected side and that found in controls without TN.
A case-control study of 30 clinically diagnosed idiopathic TN patients aged 30 to 79 years and 30 age- and sex-matched controls was conducted. We compared the trigeminal-pontine angle and trigeminal nerve atrophy via fast-imaging employing steady-state acquisition (FIESTA) MR imaging.
A sharp trigeminal-pontine angle was observed in 25 patients (25/30) on the affected side. As such, the mean angle of the trigeminal nerve on the affected side (40.17) was significantly smaller than that on the unaffected side (48.91, p = 0.001) and that in the control group (52.02, p < 0.001).
A sharp trigeminal-pontine angle on the affected side was found in idiopathic TN patients by FIESTA imaging. This suggests that a sharp trigeminal-pontine angle increases the chance of neurovascular compression on the medial side of the trigeminal nerve.
KeywordsTrigeminal neuralgia Magnetic resonance imaging Atrophy Trigeminal nerve
The authors would like to thank Hye Young Yu (R.N.), Ju-Mi Kim (R.N.), and Hyouk Sang Kwon (BS) for data acquisition.
Disclosure of Funding
Financial Support and Industry Affiliations
Conflict of Interest
- 1.Adamczyk M, Bulski T, Sowinska J, Furmanek A, Bekiesinska-Figatowska M (2007) Trigeminal nerve—artery contact in people without trigeminal neuralgia—MR study. Medical science monitor: international medical. J Exp Clin Res 13(Suppl 1):38–43Google Scholar
- 2.Akimoto H, Nagaoka T, Nariai T, Takada Y, Ohno K, Yoshino N (2002) Preoperative evaluation of neurovascular compression in patients with trigeminal neuralgia by use of three-dimensional reconstruction from two types of high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Neurosurgery 51:956–961, discussion 961–952PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Horinek D, Brezova V, Nimsky C, Belsan T, Martinkovic L, Masopust V, Vrana J, Kozler P, Plas J, Krysl D, Varjassyova A, Ghaly Y, Benes V (2009) The MRI volumetry of the posterior fossa and its substructures in trigeminal neuralgia: a validated study. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 151:669–675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Leal PR, Hermier M, Froment JC, Souza MA, Cristino-Filho G, Sindou M (2010) Preoperative demonstration of the neurovascular compression characteristics with special emphasis on the degree of compression, using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective study, with comparison to surgical findings, in 100 consecutive patients who underwent microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 152:817–825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Merskey H, Bogduk N (1994) Classification of chronic pain: descriptions of chronic pain syndromes and definitions of pain terms. IASP Press, Seatle, WA, 59–71Google Scholar
- 24.Sheth S, Branstetter BFT, Escott EJ (2009) Appearance of normal cranial nerves on steady-state free precession MR images. Radiographics: a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc. 29:1045–1055Google Scholar
- 25.Sindou M, Howeidy T, Acevedo G (2002) Anatomical observations during microvascular decompression for idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia (with correlations between topography of pain and site of the neurovascular conflict). Prospective study in a series of 579 patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 144:1–12, discussion 12–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Vergani F, Panaretos P, Penalosa A, English P, Nicholson C, Jenkins A (2011) Preoperative MRI/MRA for microvascular decompression in trigeminal neuralgia: consecutive series of 67 patients. Acta Neurochir(Wien) 153(12):2377–2381Google Scholar