Advertisement

Acta Neurochirurgica

, Volume 154, Issue 3, pp 495–499 | Cite as

Quality of life following DBS in the caudal zona incerta in patients with essential tremor

  • Ulrika SandvikEmail author
  • Gun-Marie Hariz
  • Patric Blomstedt
Clinical Article

Abstract

Background

Essential tremor (ET) is the most common movement disorder and often affects the quality of life. There are only a few studies evaluating the quality of life after deep brain stimulation (DBS).

Findings

This is a prospective study of 16 patients undergoing deep brain stimulation in the caudal Zona incerta (cZi). The quality of life was assessed with Quality of Life in Essential Tremor Questionnaire (QUEST) and SF-36 scores, and the tremor was evaluated using the essential tremor rating scale (ETRS).

Results

In the tremor rating, hand tremor on the treated side improved by 95%, hand function by 78% and activities of daily living by 71%. The QUEST score showed statistically significant improvements in the psychosocial and activities of daily living subscores. The SF-36 score did not show any significant improvement.

Conclusions

Although very good tremor reduction was achieved, the improvement in the quality of life scores was more modest. This could partly be explained by the quality of life being affected by other factors than the tremor itself.

Keywords

Deep brain stimulation Essential tremor Quality of Life Zona incerta 

Notes

Conflicts of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Auff E, Doppelbauer A, Fertl E (1991) Essential tremor: functional disability vs. subjective impairment. J Neural Transm Suppl 33:105–110PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blomstedt P, Sandvik U, Hariz MI, Fytagoridis A, Forsgren L, Hariz GM, Koskinen LO (2011) Influence of age, gender and severity of tremor on outcome after thalamic and subthalamic DBS for essential tremor. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 17:617–620PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Blomstedt P, Sandvik U, Tisch S (2010) Deep brain stimulation in the posterior subthalamic area in the treatment of essential tremor. Mov Disord 25:1350–1356PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bryant JA, De Salles A, Cabatan C, Frysinger R, Behnke E, Bronstein J (2003) The impact of thalamic stimulation on activities of daily living for essential tremor. Surg Neurol 59:479–484PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Busenbark KL, Nash J, Nash S, Hubble JP, Koller WC (1991) Is essential tremor benign? Neurology 41:1982–1983PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Deuschl G, Bain P, Brin M (1998) Consensus statement of the Movement Disorder Society on Tremor. Ad Hoc Scientific Committee. Mov Disord 13(Suppl 3):2–23PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Deuschl G, Raethjen J, Hellriegel H, Elble R (2011) Treatment of patients with essential tremor. Lancet Neurol 10:148–161PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Diamond A, Jankovic J (2005) The effect of deep brain stimulation on quality of life in movement disorders. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 76:1188–1193PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fahn S, Tolosa E, Martin C (1993) Clinical rating scale for tremor. In: Jankovic J, Tolosa E (eds) Parkinson´s disease and movement disorders. Urban and Schwarzenberg Munich, pp 271–280Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fields JA, Troster AI, Woods SP, Higginson CI, Wilkinson SB, Lyons KE, Koller WC, Pahwa R (2003) Neuropsychological and quality of life outcomes 12 months after unilateral thalamic stimulation for essential tremor. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 74:305–311PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Flora ED, Perera CL, Cameron AL, Maddern GJ (2010) Deep brain stimulation for essential tremor: A systematic review. Mov Disord 25:1550–1559PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hariz GM, Blomstedt P, Koskinen LO (2008) Long-term effect of deep brain stimulation for essential tremor on activities of daily living and health-related quality of life. Acta Neurol Scand 118:387–394PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hariz GM, Lindberg M, Bergenheim AT (2002) Impact of thalamic deep brain stimulation on disability and health-related quality of life in patients with essential tremor. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 72:47–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kitagawa M, Murata J, Kikuchi S, Sawamura Y, Saito H, Sasaki H, Tashiro K (2000) Deep brain stimulation of subthalamic area for severe proximal tremor. Neurology 55:114–116PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Koller WC, Busenbark K, Miner K (1994) The relationship of essential tremor to other movement disorders: report on 678 patients. Essential Tremor Study Group. Ann Neurol 35:717–723PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lorenz D, Poremba C, Papengut F, Schreiber S, Deuschl G (2011) The psychosocial burden of essential tremor in an outpatient- and a community-based cohort. Eur J Neurol 18(7):972–979PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lorenz D, Schwieger D, Moises H, Deuschl G (2006) Quality of life and personality in essential tremor patients. Mov Disord 21:1114–1118PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Louis ED, Barnes L, Albert SM, Cote L, Schneier FR, Pullman SL, Yu Q (2001) Correlates of functional disability in essential tremor. Mov Disord 16:914–920PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Louis ED, Ferreira JJ (2010) How common is the most common adult movement disorder? Update on the worldwide prevalence of essential tremor. Mov Disord 25:534–541PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lyons KE, Pahwa R, Busenbark KL, Troster AI, Wilkinson S, Koller WC (1998) Improvements in daily functioning after deep brain stimulation of the thalamus for intractable tremor. Mov Disord 13:690–692PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Murata J, Kitagawa M, Uesugi H, Saito H, Iwasaki Y, Kikuchi S, Tashiro K, Sawamura Y (2003) Electrical stimulation of the posterior subthalamic area for the treatment of intractable proximal tremor. J Neurosurg 99:708–715PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nguyen HV, Ngian V, Cordato D, Shen Q, Chan DK (2007) Quality of life in a random sample of community dwelling older patients with essential tremor. Acta Neurol Scand 116:289–292PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Plaha P, Javed S, Agombar D, O’Farrell G, Khan S, Whone A, Gill S (2011) Bilateral caudal zona incerta nucleus stimulation for essential tremor: outcome and quality of life. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 82(8):899–904PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Plaha P, Patel NK, Gill SS (2004) Stimulation of the subthalamic region for essential tremor. J Neurosurg 101:48–54PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sullivan MK, Karlsson J, Taft C, Ware JE (2002) SF-36 Hälsoenkät. Svensk manual och tolkningsguide, 2:a upplagan (Swedish Manual and Interpretation Guide, 2nd Edition). Sahlgrenska University Hospital, GothenburgGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tornqvist AL, Ahlstrom G, Widner H, Rehncrona S (2007) Fulfilment of patients' goals after thalamic deep brain stimulation: a follow-up study. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 13:29–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Troster AI, Pahwa R, Fields JA, Tanner CM, Lyons KE (2005) Quality of life in Essential Tremor Questionnaire (QUEST): development and initial validation. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 11:367–373PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36) I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30:473–483PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ulrika Sandvik
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  • Gun-Marie Hariz
    • 2
  • Patric Blomstedt
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Neuroscience, Division of NeurosurgeryUmeå UniversityUmeåSweden
  2. 2.Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Division of Occupational TherapyUmeå UniversityUmeåSweden
  3. 3.Department of NeurosurgeryUmeå University HospitalUmeåSweden

Personalised recommendations