Acta Neurochirurgica

, 150:1141 | Cite as

Changes in intracranial pulse pressure amplitudes after shunt implantation and adjustment of shunt valve opening pressure in normal pressure hydrocephalus

  • Per Kristian EideEmail author
  • Wilhelm Sorteberg
Clinical Article



We have previously reported that the intracranial pulse pressure amplitudes were elevated in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) patients responding to shunt surgery. Whether or not shunt implantation or adjustment of the shunt valve opening pressure modifies the intracranial pulse pressure amplitudes in NPH patients remains to be established. This report summarises our observations.

Patients and methods

Thirteen patients with NPH (idiopathic in nine and secondary in four) are presented in whom continuous intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring was done before and after shunt implantation. In two, ICP monitoring was also done during adjustment of shunt valve opening pressure. The mean ICP and mean ICP wave amplitude (i.e. pulse pressure amplitudes) were determined in 6-s time windows.


After shunt implantation there was a fall in both mean ICP and mean ICP wave amplitude; the reduction in the two ICP parameters correlated significantly. However, mean ICP in the supine position was normal (i.e. <15 mmHg) in 12 of 13 patients before shunt placement, and remained normal after shunting. According to our criteria, the mean ICP wave amplitudes were elevated before shunting in 12 of 13 patients and became “normalised” the day after shunting in nine patients. The reduction in mean ICP wave amplitude after shunt was highly significant at the group level. Moreover, adjustment of shunt valve opening pressure modified the levels of mean ICP wave amplitudes.


The present observations in 13 NPH patients indicate that shunt implantation reduces mean ICP wave amplitudes. Moreover, the level of reduction can be tailored by adjustment of the shunt valve opening pressure.


Intracranial pressure Pulse pressure amplitudes Normal pressure hydrocephalus Shunt valve opening pressure Clinical outcome 



  1. 1.
    Bergsneider M (2000) Management of hydrocephalus with programmable valves after traumatic brain injury and subarachnoid haemorrhage. Curr Opinion Neurol 13:661–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bergsneider M, Yang I, Hu X, McArthur DL, Cook SW, Boscardin WJ (2004) Relationship between valve opening pressure, body position, and intracranial pressure in normal pressure hydrocephalus: paradigm for selection of programmable valve pressure setting. Neurosurgery 55:851–859PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boon AJW, Tans JTJ, Delwel EJ, Egeler-Peerdeman SM, Hanlo PW, Wurzer HAL, Avezaat CJJ, deJong DA, Gooskens RHJM, Hermans J (1998) Dutch normal-pressure hydrocephalus study: randomised comparison of low- and medium-pressure shunts. J Neurosurg 88:490–495PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cook SW, Bergsneider M (2002) Why valve opening pressure plays a relatively minor role in the postural ICP response to ventricular shunts in normal pressure hydrocephalus: modelling and implications. Acta Neurochir Suppl 81:15–17PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Czosnyka M, Pickard JD (2004) Monitoring and interpretation of intracranial pressure. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 75:813–821PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Eide PK (2003) Quantitative analysis of continuous intracranial pressure recordings in symptomatic patients with extracranial shunts. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 74:231–237PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Eide PK (2006) A new method for processing of continuous intracranial pressure signals. Med Eng Phys 28:579–587PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Eide PK (2006) Intracranial pressure parameters in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus patients treated with ventriculoperitoneal shunts. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 148:21–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Eide PK, Brean A (2006) Intracranial pulse pressure amplitude levels determined during pre-operative assessment of subjects with possible idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 148:1151–1156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Eide PK, Fremming AD (2003) Lack of relationship between resistance to cerebrospinal fluid outflow and intracranial pressure in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Neurol Scand 108:381–388PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Malm J, Kristensen B, Fagerlund M, Koskinen L-O, Ekstedt J (1995) Cerebrospinal fluid shunt dynamics in patients with idiopathic adult hydrocephalus syndrome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 58:715–723PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sorteberg A, Eide PK, Fremming A (2004) A prospective study on the clinical effect of surgical treatment of normal pressure hydrocephalus: the value of hydrodynamic evaluation. Br J Neurosurg 18:149–157PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zemack G, Romner B (2000) Seven years of clinical experience with the programmable Codman Hakim valve: a retrospective study of 583 patients. J Neurosurg 92:941–948PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zemack G, Romner B (2002) Adjustable valves in normal-pressure hydrocephalus: a retrospective study of 218 patients. Neurosurgery 51:1392–1402PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Neurosurgery, Division of Clinical NeuroscienceThe National Hospital RikshospitaletOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations