Advertisement

Acta Neurochirurgica

, Volume 149, Issue 1, pp 51–58 | Cite as

20 years follow-up after the first microsurgical lumbar discectomies in Iceland

  • M. Jensdottir
  • K. Gudmundsson
  • B. Hannesson
  • G. Gudmundsson
Clinical Article

Summary

Background. Microsurgical discectomies are an established procedure in spinal surgery. This operating technique was first used in the Department of Neurosurgery in Iceland in 1981 and has become standard operative treatment for herniated lumbar discs. There is a great variability in outcome reports regarding recurrence rate and re-operation rate. Few articles are based on follow-up of more than 10 years. This article presents the results of a 20 years follow-up study.

Methods. A retrospective study of all patients undergoing microsurgical discectomy for herniated lumbar disc, from June 1, 1981 to December 31, 1984. Outcome, based on recurrence rate, return to work and patient satisfaction was determined by a self-evaluation questionnaire, phone interviews and patient medical records.

Findings. Of the 170 patients, 134 (78.8%) were included in the study (M:F, 58:42%). Preoperative symptoms: back pain with sciatica 108 (80.6%), sciatica 20 (14.9%), back pain 2 (1.5%). Mean follow-up time was 20.7 years (19.5–22.8). Recurrence rate was 12.7%. 19 patients (14.2%) underwent a subsequent lumbar operation at a different level or side. A majority of patients 108 (80.6%) returned to previous level of work, 26 (19.4%) lost some or all working capabilities. Patient satisfaction was high, 91.1% reporting excellent (68.7%) or good (22.4%) results. 5.2% of patients rated the outcome fair and 3.7% poor. Women reported worse outcome than men, excellent M:F 74.7:60.7%, and poor 7.1:1.3%. There was no significant difference in patient satisfaction in patients undergoing additional operations or those with recurrence of the herniated disc.

Conclusions. Outcome was very good with 92.0% return to work and 91.1% patient satisfaction. The recurrence rate was 12.7% with a substantial number of cases occuring 10–20 years after operation. To conclude, microsurgical discectomies maintain a high success rate in the long-term.

Keywords: Microsurgical discectomy; disc herniation; outcome; follow-up. 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abernathy, CD, Yasargil, MG,  et al. 1990Results in MicrosurgeryWilliams, RW eds. Microsurgery of the lumbar spineAspen PublishersRockville223226Google Scholar
  2. Asch, HL, Lewis, PJ, Moreland, DB, Egnatchik, JG, Yu, YJ, Clabeaux, DE, Hyland, AH 2002Prospective multiple outcomes study of outpatient lumbar microdiscectomy: should 75–80% success rates be the norm?J Neurosurg963444PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Atlas, SJ, Chang, Y, Kammann, E, Keller, RB, Deyo, RA, Singer, DE 2000Long-term disability and return to work among patients who have a herniated lumbar disc: the effect of disability compensationJ Bone Joint Surg Am82415PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Atlas, SJ, Keller, RB, Chang, Y, Deyo, RA, Singer, DE 2001Surgical and nonsurgical management of sciatica secondary to a lumbar disc herniation: five-year outcomes from the maine lumbar spine studySpine2611791187PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Atlas, SJ, Keller, RB, Wu, YA, Deyo, RA, Singer, DE 2005Long-term outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of sciatica secondary to a lumbar disc herniation: 10 year results from the maine lumbar spine studySpine30927935PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Caspar W (1977) A new surgical procedure for lumbar disc herniation causing less tissue damage through a microsurgical approach. Adv Neurosurg, pp 74–77Google Scholar
  7. Donceel, P, Du, BM 1998Fitness for work after surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective studyEur Spine J72935PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Findlay, GF, Hall, BI, Musa, BS, Oliveira, MD, Fear, SC 1998A 10-year follow-up of the outcome of lumbar microdiscectomySpine2311681171PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fisher, C, Noonan, V, Bishop, P, Boyd, M, Fairholm, D, Wing, P, Dvorak, M 2004Outcome evaluation of the operative management of lumbar disc herniation causing sciaticaJ Neurosurg100317324PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Fritsch, EW, Heisel, J, Rupp, S 1996The failed back surgery syndrome: reasons, intraoperative findings, and long-term results: a report of 182 operative treatmentsSpine21626633PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gibson, JN, Grant, IC, Waddell, G 1999The Cochrane review of surgery for lumbar disc prolapse and degenerative lumbar spondylosisSpine2418201832PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Graver, V, Loeb, M, Rasmussen, F, Lie, H, Ljunggren, AE 1998Clinical overall score: outcome evaluation after lumbar disc surgery, assessments of reliability and validityScand J Rehabil Med30227233PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Howe, J, Frymoyer, JW 1985The effects of questionnaire design on the determination of end results in lumbar spinal surgerySpine10804805PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kotilainen, E, Valtonen, S, Carlson, CA 1993Microsurgical treatment of lumbar disc herniation: follow-up of 237 patientsActa Neurochir (Wien)120143149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Loupasis, GA, Stamos, K, Katonis, PG, Sapkas, G, Korres, DS, Hartofilakidis, G 1999Seven- to 20-year outcome of lumbar discectomySpine2423132317PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Maroon, JC 2002Current concepts in minimally invasive discectomyNeurosurgery51S137S145PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Mixter, WJ, Barr, JS 1934Rupture of the intervertebral disc with involvement of the spinal canalN Engl J Med211210215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Moore, AJ, Chilton, JD, Uttley, D 1994Long-term results of microlumbar discectomyBr J Neurosurg8319326PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Morgan-Hough, CV, Jones, PW, Eisenstein, SM 2003Primary and revision lumbar discectomy. A 16-year review from one centreJ Bone Joint Surg Br85871874PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Nygaard, OP, Kloster, R, Solberg, T 2000Duration of leg pain as a predictor of outcome after surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a prospective cohort study with 1-year follow upJ Neurosurg92131134PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Pappas, CT, Harrington, T, Sonntag, VK 1992Outcome analysis in 654 surgically treated lumbar disc herniationsNeurosurgery30862866PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Postacchini, F 1996Results of surgery compared with conservative management for lumbar disc herniationsSpine2113831387PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Postacchini, F 1999Management of herniation of the lumbar discJ Bone Joint Surg Br81567576PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Quigley, MR, Bost, J, Maroon, JC, Elrifai, A, Panahandeh, M 1998Outcome after microdiscectomy: results of a prospective single institutional studySurg Neurol49263267PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rothoerl, RD, Woertgen, C, Brawanski, A 2002When should conservative treatment for lumbar disc herniation be ceased and surgery considered?Neurosurg Rev25162165PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schoeggl, A, Reddy, M, Matula, C 2003Functional and economic outcome following microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation in 672 patientsJ Spinal Disord Tech16150155PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Sigurdsson, AS, Gudmundsson, G, Hannesson, B, Gudmundsson, K 1991Microsurgical lumbar discectomies. Outcome study of the Neurosurgical department in Iceland, 1981–1984Icelandic Med J77249253Google Scholar
  28. Solberg, TK, Nygaard, OP, Sjaavik, K, Hofoss, D, Ingebrigtsen, T 2005The risk of “getting worse” after lumbar microdiscectomyEur Spine J144954PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Thome, C, Barth, M, Scharf, J, Schmiedek, P 2005Outcome after lumbar sequestrectomy compared with microdiscectomy: a prospective randomized studyJ Neurosurg Spine2271278PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Vik, A, Zwart, JA, Hulleberg, G, Nygaard, OP 2001Eight year outcome after surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a comparison of reoperated and not reoperated patientsActa Neurochir (Wien)143607610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Weber, H 1983Lumbar disc herniation. A controlled, prospective study with ten years of observationSpine8131140PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wenger, M, Mariani, L, Kalbarczyk, A, Groger, U 2001Long-term outcome of 104 patients after lumbar sequestrectomy according to WilliamsNeurosurgery49329334PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Williams, RW 1978Microlumbar discectomy: a conservative surgical approach to the virgin herniated lumbar discSpine3175182PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Williams, RW,  et al. 1990Results in lumbar microsurgeryWilliams, RW eds. Microsurgery of the lumbar spineAspen PublishersRockville211214Google Scholar
  35. Woertgen, C, Rothoerl, RD, Breme, K, Altmeppen, J, Holzschuh, M, Brawanski, A 1999Variability of outcome after lumbar disc surgerySpine24807811PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Yasargil MG (1977) Microsurgical operation of herniated lumbar disc. Adv Neurosurg, pp 81–81Google Scholar
  37. Yorimitsu, E, Chiba, K, Toyama, Y, Hirabayashi, K 2001Long-term outcomes of standard discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a follow-up study of more than 10 yearsSpine26652657PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Jensdottir
    • 1
  • K. Gudmundsson
    • 1
  • B. Hannesson
    • 1
  • G. Gudmundsson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of NeurosurgeryLandspítali University HospitalReykjavíkIceland

Personalised recommendations