Advertisement

Acta Neurochirurgica

, Volume 148, Issue 1, pp 21–29 | Cite as

Intracranial pressure parameters in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus patients treated with ventriculo-peritoneal shunts

  • P. K. Eide
Clinical Article

Summary

Background. Although the mean intracranial pressure (ICP) is normal in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH), there could possibly be alterations in their single ICP waves.

Method. Thirty-nine consecutive patients treated for iNPH with ventriculo-peritoneal shunts were followed prospectively with regard to clinical and radiological findings. Changes in clinical state 12 months after shunt surgery were assessed as change on a 15-3 score NPH Grading Scale, while the changes in ventricular size were assessed by linear measures. The ICP recordings were performed as part of routine pre-operative assessment, stored as raw data files, and analyzed retrospectively. The mean ICP as well as single ICP wave amplitudes were computed and analysed in consecutive 6 second time windows.

Findings. Twelve months after shunt surgery, changes in NPH score of 5 or more (very significant improvement) were observed in 12 patients (31%), of 3 to 4 (significant improvement) in 6 patients (15%), of 1 to 2 (slight improvement) in 9 patients (23%) and of −4 to 0 (non-responders) in 12 patients (31%). The ventricular size did not change in any of the outcome categories. While the pre-operative mean ICP was similar between outcome groups, the mean ICP wave amplitude was significantly higher in patients improving clinically as compared to the non-responders.

Conclusions. While pre-operative mean ICP was similar, the mean ICP wave amplitudes were significantly higher in iNPH patients improving clinically after shunt treatment as compared to the non-responders.

Keywords: Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus; extra-cranial shunts; outcome; intracranial pressure; single pressure wave parameters. 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, RD, Fisher, CM, Hakim, S, Ojeman, RG, Sweet, WH 1965Symptomatic occult hydrocephalus with “normal” cerebrospinal fluid pressure. A treatable syndrome.N Engl J Med273117126PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altman DG (1991) Practical statistics for medical research. Chapman & Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Avezaat CJJ, vanEijndhoven JHM, deJong DA, Moolenaar WCJ (1976) A new method of monitoring intracranial volume-pressure relationship. In: Becks JWF, Bosch DA, Brock M (eds) Intracranial pressure, vol III, Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, pp 308–313Google Scholar
  4. Avezaat, CJJ, van Eijndhoven, JHM, Wyper, DJ 1979Cerebrospinal fluid pulse pressure and intracranial volume-pressure relationships.J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry42687700PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Barcena, A, Mestre, C, Canizal, JM, Rivero, B, Lobato, RD 1997Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: Analysis of factors related to cerebrospinal fluid dynamics determining functional prognosis.Acta Neurochir (Wien)139933941Google Scholar
  6. Boon, AJW, Tans, JTJ, Delwel, EJ, Egeler-Peerdeman, SM, Hanlo, PW, Wurzer, HAL, Avezaat, CJJ, deJong, DA, Gooskens, RHJM, Hermans, J 1997Dutch normal-pressure hydrocephalus study: Prediction of outcome after shunting by resistance to outflow of cerebrospinal fluid.J Neurosurg87687693PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Boon, AJW, Tans, JTJ, Delwel, EJ, Egeler-Peerdeman, SM, Hanlo, PW, Wurzer, HAL, Hermans, J 1999Dutch normal-pressure hydrocephalus study: The role of cerebrovascular disease.J Neurosurg90221226PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Chopp, M, Portnoy, HD 1980Systems analysis of intracranial pressure. Comparison with volume-pressure test and CSF-pulse amplitude analysis.J Neurosurg53516527PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Christensen, L, Børgesen, SE 1989Single pulse pressure wave analysis by fast Fourier transformation.Neurol Res11197200PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Czosnyka, M, Pickard, JD 2004Monitoring and interpretation of intracranial pressure.J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry75813821PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eide, PK, Fremming, AD, Sorteberg, A 2003Lack of relationship between resistance to cerebrospinal fluid outflow and intracranial pressure in normal pressure hydrocephalus.Acta Neurol Scand108381388PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eide, PK 2003The relationship between intracranial pressure and size of cerebral ventricles assessed by computed tomography.Acta Neurochir (Wien)145171179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eide, PK 2005Assessment of childhood intracranial pressure recordings using a new method of processing intracranial pressure signals.Ped Neurosurg41122130Google Scholar
  14. van Eijndhoven, JHM, Avezaat, CJJ 1986Cerebrospinal fluid pulse pressure and the pulsatile variation in cerebral blood volume: An experimental study in dogs.Neurosurgery19507522PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Foltz, EL, Aine, C 1981Diagnosis of hydrocephalus by CSF pulse-wave analysis: A clinical study.Surg Neurol15283293PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Foltz, EL, Blanks, JP, Yonemura, K 1990CSF pulsatility in hydrocephalus: Respiratory effect on pulse wave slope as an indicator of intracranial compliance.Neurol Res126774PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Gonzales-Darder, JM, Barcia-Salorio, JL 1989Pulse amplitude and volume-pressure relationships in experimental hydrocephalus.Acta Neurochir (Wien)97166170Google Scholar
  18. Greitz, D 2004Radiological assessment of hydrocephalus: New theories and implications for therapy.Neurosurg Rev27145165PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hamer, J, Alberti, E, Hoyer, S, Wiedemann, K 1977Influence of systemic and cerebral vascular factors on the cerebrospinal fluid pulse waves.J Neurosurg463645PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hebb, AO, Cusimano, MD 2001Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a systematic review of diagnosis and outcome.Neurosurgery4911661186PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Hirai, O, Handa, H, Ishikawa, M, Kim, SH 1984Epidural pulse waveform as an indicator of intracranial pressure dynamics.Surg Neurol216774PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Langfitt, TW, Weinstein, JD, Kassell, NF 1965Cerebral vasomotor paralysis produced by intracranial hypertension.Neurology (Minneap)15622641Google Scholar
  23. Löfgren, J, vonEssen, C, Zwetnow, NN 1973The pressure-volume curve of the cerebrospinal fluid space in dogs.Acta Neurol Scand49557574PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Marmarou, A, Shulman, K, LaMorgese, J 1975Compartmental analysis of compliance and outflow resistance of the cerebrospinal fluid system.J Neurosurg43523534PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Miller, JD, Garibi, J, Pickard, JD 1973Induced changes of cerebrospinal fluid volume. Effects during continuous monitoring of ventricular fluid pressure.Arch Neurol28265269PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Nornes, H, Aaslid, R, Lindegaard, KF 1977Intracranial pulse pressure dynamics in patients with intracranial hypertension.Acta Neurochir (Wien)38177186Google Scholar
  27. Piper, IR, Chan, KH, Whittle, IR, Miller, JD 1993An experimental study of cerebrovascular resistance, pressure transmission and craniospinal compliance.Neurosurgery32805816PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Portnoy, HD, Chopp, M, Branch, C, Shannon, MB 1982Cerebrospinal fluid pulse waveform as an indicator of cerebral autoregulation.J Neurosurg56666678PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Raftopoulos, C, Deleval, J, Chaskis, C, Leonard, A, Cantraine, F, Desmyttere, F, Clarysse, S, Brotchi, J 1994Cognitive recovery in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a prospective study.Neurosurgery35397405PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Savolainen, S, Hurskainen, H, Paljärvi, L, Alafuzoff, I, Vapalathi, M 2002Five-year outcome of normal pressure hydrocephalus with or without a shunt: Predictive value of the clinical signs, neuropsychological evaluation and infusion test.Acta Neurochir (Wien)144515523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sorteberg, A, Eide, PK, Fremming, A 2004A prospective study on the clinical effect of surgical treatment of normal pressure hydrocephalus: the value of hydrodynamic evaluation.Br J Neurosurg18149157PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schwartz, TH, Yoon, SS, Cutruzzola, FW, Goodman, RR 1996Third ventriculostomy: Postoperative ventricular size and outcome.Minim Invasive Neurosurg39122129PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schwartz, TH, Ho, B, Prestigiacomo, CJ, Bruce, JN, Feldstein, NA, Goodman, RR 1999Ventricular volume following third ventriculostomy.J Neurosurg912025PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Wilkinson, HA, Schuman, N, Ruggiero, J 1979Nonvolumetric methods of detecting impaired intracranial compliance or reactivity. Pulse width and wave form analysis.J Neurosurg50758767PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag/Wien 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. K. Eide
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of NeurosurgeryThe National HospitalRikshospitaletNorway

Personalised recommendations