Computing

, Volume 98, Issue 7, pp 685–708 | Cite as

LESPP: lightweight and efficient strong privacy preserving authentication scheme for secure VANET communication

  • Mingzhong Wang
  • Dan Liu
  • Liehuang Zhu
  • Yongjun Xu
  • Fei Wang
Article

Abstract

Authentication in vehicular ad-hoc network (VANET) is still a research challenge, as it requires not only secure and efficient authentication, but also privacy preservation. In this paper, we proposed a lightweight and efficient authentication scheme (LESPP) with strong privacy preservation for secure VANET communication. The proposed scheme utilizes self-generated pseudo identity to guarantee both privacy preservation and conditional traceability, and it only requires a lightweight symmetric encryption and message authentication code (MAC) generation for message signing and a fast MAC re-generation for verification. Compared with currently existing public key based schemes, the proposed scheme significantly reduces computation cost by \(10^2\)\(10^3\) times and decreases communication overhead by 41.33–77.60 %, thus achieving resilience to denial of service (DoS) attack. In LESPP, only key management center can expose a vehicle’s real identity from its pseudo identity, therefore, LESPP provides strong privacy preservation so that the adversaries cannot trace any vehicles, even if all roadside units are compromised. Furthermore, vehicles in LESPP need not maintain certificate revocation list (CRL), so any CRL related overhead is avoided. Extensive simulations reveal that the novel scheme is feasible and has an outstanding performance of nearly 0 ms network delay and 0 % packet loss ratio, which are especially appropriate for realtime emergency event reporting applications.

Keywords

Secure VANET communication Lightweight authentication   Strong privacy preservation Conditional traceability DoS resilience 

Mathematics Subject Classification

90B18 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This paper is supported by Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University (NCET-12-0046), National Natural Science Foundation of China No.61272512, Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation No.4121001, and DNSLAB, China Internet Network Information Center, Beijing 100190.

References

  1. 1.
    Weiland RJ, Purser LB (2000) Intelligent transportation systems. Transportation in the new millennium. http://trid.trb.org/view.aspx?id=639268
  2. 2.
    Taylor MAP (2001) Intelligent transport systems. Handbook of transport systems and traffic control. p 461. http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Handbook+of+transport+systems+and+traffic+control+TAYLOR&btnG=&hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5
  3. 3.
    Wang F, Zeng D, Yang L (2006) Smart cars on smart roads: an IEEE intelligent transportation systems society update. IEEE Pervasive Comput 5(4):68–69MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dedicated Short Range Communications (DSRC) Home. http://trid.trb.org/view.aspx?id=725762. Accessed 31 Dec 2002
  5. 5.
    Msn, TV. http://www.msntv.com/. Accessed 20 May 2007
  6. 6.
    Raya M, Hubaux J (2005) The security of vehicular ad Hoc networks. In: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM workshop on security of ad hoc and sensor networks, pp 11–21Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Raya M, Papadimitratos P, Hubaux JP (2006) Securing vehicular communications. IEEE Wirel Commun 13(1):8–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sun Y, Lu R, Lin X, Shen XS (2010) An efficient pseudonymous authentication scheme with strong privacy preservation for vehicular communications. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 59(1):3589–3603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mao W (2003) Modern cryptography: theory and practice. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Libert B, Vergnaud D (2008) Multi-use unidirectional proxy re-signatures. In: Proceedings of ACM CCS, Alexandria, pp 511–520Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lu R, Lin X, Zhu H, Ho P, Shen XS (2008) ECPP: efficient conditional privacy preservation protocol for secure vehicular communications. In: Proceedings of 2008 INFOCOM, pp 1229–1237Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhang C, Lu R, Lin X, Ho P, Shen XS (2008) An efficient identity-based batch verification scheme for vehicular sensor networks. In: Proceedings of 2008 INFOCOM, pp 246–250Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fiat A (1990) Batch RSA. In: Proceedings of CRYPTO’89, pp 175–185Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Camenisch J, Hohenberger S, Pedersen M (2007) Batch verification of short signatures. In: Proceedings of EUROCRYPT’07, pp 246–263Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lin X, Sun X, Ho P, Shen XS (2007) GSIS: a secure and privacy preserving protocol for vehicular communications. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 56(1):3442–3456Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cham D, Heyst EV (1991) Group signatures. In: Proceedings of 1991 advances in cryptology- EUROCRYPT, pp 257–265Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Boneh D, Boyen X, Shacham H (2004) Short group signatures. In: Proceedings of 2004 CRYPTO, pp 227–242Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shamir A (1984) Identity-based cryptosystems and signature schemes. In: Proceedings of 1984 advances in CryptologyCrypto. Springer, New York, pp 47–53Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wang F, Xu YJ, Wu L, Dan Liu, Zhu LH (2013) Authenticating and tracing biological anonym of VANET based on KMC decentralization and two-factor. In: Proceedings of the 11th annual international conference on mobile systems, applications, and services (MobiSys ’13). ACM, New York, pp 519–520Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhang L, Wu Q, Solanas A, Domingo FJ (2010) A scalable robust authentication protocol for secure vehicular communications. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 59(1):1606–1617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sampigethaya K, Li M, Huang L, Poovendran R (2007) AMOEBA: robust location privacy scheme for VANET. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 25(1):1569–1589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Calandriello G, Papadimitratos P, Hubaux J, Lioy A (2007) Efficient and robust pseudonymous authentication in VANET. In: Proceedings of 2007 the fourth ACM international workshop on Vehicular, ad hoc networks, pp 19–28Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Studer A, Bai F, Bellur B, Perrig A (2008) Flexible, extensible, and efficient VANET authentication. J Commun Netw 11(6):574–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Perrig A, Canetti R, Tygar JD, Song D (2002) The TESLA broadcast authentication protocol. In: Proceedings of RSA CryptoBytes’02Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lin X, Sun X, Wang X, Zhang C, Ho P, Shen XS (2008) TSVC—timed efficient and secure vehicular communications with privacy preserving. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 7(1):4987–4998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ren K, Lou W, Deng RH, Kim K (2006) A novel privacy preserving authentication and access control scheme in pervasive computing environments. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 55(4):1373–1384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sampigethava K, Huang L, Li M, Poovendran R, Matsuura K, Sezaki K (2006) CARAVAN: providing location privacy for VANET. In: Proceedings of International workshop on vehicular ad hoc networksGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Daemen J, Rijmen V (1998) AES Proposal: Rijndael. In: Proceedings of the first advanced encryption standard candidate conference, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bellare M, Canetti R, Krawczyk H (1996) Message authentication using hash functions the HMAC construction. RSA Lab CryptoBytes 2(1):12–15MATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hess F (2003) Efficient identity based signature schemes based on pairings. Sel Areas Cryptogr 2595:310–324Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Boneh D, Lynn B, Shacham H (2001) Short signatures from the Weil pairing. In: Proceedings of 2001 ASIACRYPT, pp 514–532Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Katz J, Lindell Y (2007) Introduction to modern cryptography: principles and protocols. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FloridaMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Scott M (2007) Efficient implementation of cryptographic pairings. http://www.pairing-conference.org/2007/invited/Scott_slide.pdf
  34. 34.
    Zhang C, Lin X, Lu R, Ho P, Shen XS (2008) An efficient message authentication scheme for vehicular communications. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 57(1):3357–3368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Keranen A, Ott J, Karkkainen T (2009) The ONE simulator for DTN protocol evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on simulation tools and techniquesGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Papadimitratos P, Levente B, Schoch E, Freudiger J, Raya M, Ma Z (2008) Secure vehicular communication systems: design and architecture. Commun Mag IEEE 46(1):100–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hsiao H, Studer A, Chen C, Perrig A, Bai F, Bellur B (2011) Flooding-resilient broadcast authentication for VANETs. In: Proceedings of the 17th annual international conference on mobile computing and networking, pp 193–204Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Zhang X, Liu C, Nepal S, Pandey S, Chen J (2013) A privacy leakage upper-bound constraint based approach for cost-effective privacy preserving of intermediate datasets in cloud. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst 24(6):1192–1202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Zhang X, Yang LT, Liu C, Chen J (2014) A scalable two-phase top-down specialization approach for data anonymization using MapReduce on cloud. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst 25(2):363–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Zhang X, Liu C, Nepal S, Chen J (2013) An efficient quasi-identifier index based approach for privacy preservation over incremental data sets on cloud. J Comput Syst Sci 79(5):542–555MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mingzhong Wang
    • 1
  • Dan Liu
    • 1
  • Liehuang Zhu
    • 1
  • Yongjun Xu
    • 2
  • Fei Wang
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Computer ScienceBeijing Institute of TechnologyBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Institute of Computing TechnologyChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations