Advertisement

Plant Systematics and Evolution

, Volume 304, Issue 6, pp 747–756 | Cite as

Blum versus Romagnesi: testing possible synonymies of some European russulas (Russulaceae, Basidiomycota)

  • Miroslav CaboňEmail author
  • Soňa Jančovičová
  • Jean M. Trendel
  • Pierre-Arthur Moreau
  • Felix Hampe
  • Miroslav Kolařík
  • Annemieke Verbeken
  • Slavomír Adamčík
Original Article
  • 216 Downloads

Abstract

Among 45 Russula species and infraspecific taxa described by J. Blum, only few are currently accepted. Here we present a case study on R. formosa nom. illeg. (homotypic synonym of R. blumiana), R. decipiens var. ochrospora nom. inval. and R. roseobrunnea. The study is based on sequences and morphological observations of authentic herbarium material determined by J. Blum. The sequence data demonstrate that R. decipiens var. ochrospora is probably identical with the type variety and R. roseobrunnea is probably conspecific with R. rutila. Russula blumiana is recognised and described in detail as a good species related to R. badia.

Keywords

Multi-locus phylogeny Russula blumiana Russula decipiens var. ochrospora Russula roseobrunnea Type studies 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Curator and staff of the herbarium PC are acknowledged for the loan of the material from Blum’s herbarium; H. Marxmüller is acknowledged for the collection of R. badia. The studies of S. Adamčík, M. Caboň and S. Jančovičová were funded by the Slovak Research and Development Agency APVV-15-0210. The studies of M. Caboň and M. Kolařík were supported by bilateral scientific mobility project SAV-AV ČR 16-06 and Intra-Visegrad scholarship No. 51400484.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

606_2018_1506_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (51 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 51 kb)

References

  1. Adamčík S, Jančovičová S (2012) Type studies in Russula subsection Maculatinae: R. decipiens and related taxa as interpreted by H. Romagnesi. Cryptog Mycol 33:411–420.  https://doi.org/10.7872/crym.v33.iss4.2012.411 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adamčík S, Jančovičová S (2013) Type studies in Russula subsection Maculatinae: four species typified by H. Romagnesi. Sydowia 65:201–222Google Scholar
  3. Adamčík S, Marhold K (2000) Taxonomy of the Russula xerampelina group. I. Morphometric study of the Russula xerampelina group in Slovakia. Mycotaxon 76:463–479Google Scholar
  4. Adamčík S, Caboň M, Eberhardt U, Saba M, Hampe F, Slovák M, Kleine J, Marxmüller H, Jančovičová S, Pfister DH, Khalid AN, Kolařík M, Marhold K, Verbeken A (2016) A molecular analysis reveals hidden species diversity within the current concept of Russula maculata (Russulaceae, Basidiomycota). Phytotaxa 270:71–88.  https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.270.2.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blum J (1953) Les Russules âcres à sporée jaune. Bull Trimestriel Soc Mycol France 69:57–76Google Scholar
  6. Blum J (1962) Les Russules. Flore Monographique des Russules de la France et des Pays Voisins, LechevalierGoogle Scholar
  7. Bon M (1979) Fungorum rariorum icones coloratae. Pars XI. J. CramerGoogle Scholar
  8. Bon M (1986) Validations et typifications des Russules de Blum. Cryptog Mycol 7:295–309Google Scholar
  9. Bon M (1988) Clé monographique des russules d’Europe. Doc Mycol 18:1–120Google Scholar
  10. Buyck B (1989) Valeur taxonomique du bleu de crésyl pour le genre Russula. Bull Trimestriel Soc Mycol France 105:1–6Google Scholar
  11. Buyck B (1991) The study of microscopic features in Russula 2. Sterile cells of the hymenium. Russulales News 1:62–85Google Scholar
  12. Caboň M, Eberhardt U, Looney B, Hampe F, Kolařík M, Jančovičová S, Verbeken A, Adamčík S (2017) New insights in Russula subsect. Rubrinae: phylogeny and the quest for synapomorphic characters. Mycol Progr 16:877–892.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-017-1322-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eberhardt U (2012) Methods for DNA barcoding of fungi. In: Kress WJ, Erickson DL (eds) DNA barcodes methods and protocols. Humana Press, New York, pp 183–205.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-591-6_9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gardes M, Bruns TD (1993) ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes—application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Molec Ecol 2:113–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gouy M, Guindon S, Gascuel O (2010) SeaView version 4: a multiplatform graphical user interface for sequence alignment and phylogenetic tree building. Molec Biol Evol 27:221–224.  https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msp259 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hall T (2013) BioEdit, biological sequence alignment editor for Windows 95/98/NT/2000/XP/7, version 7.2.5. Available at: http://www.mbio.ncsu.edu/bioedit/bioedit.html. Accessed 20 Feb 2014
  17. Holec J, Vašutová M, Kolařík M, Kříž M (2017) Galerina saxicola (Fungi, Agaricales) is conspecific with G. stordalii and new data on ecology of the latter species. Pl Syst Evol 303:23–33.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-016-1349-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Katoh K, Standley DM (2013) MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software, version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Molec Biol Evol 30:772–780.  https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst010 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S, Buxton S, Cooper A, Markowitz S, Duran C, Thierer T, Ashton B, Meintjes P, Drummond A (2012) Geneious basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 28:1647–1649.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts199 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Knebelsberger T, Stöger I (2012) DNA extraction, preservation, and amplification. In: Kress WJ, Erickson DL (eds) DNA barcodes methods and protocols. Humana Press, New York, pp 311–338.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-591-6_14 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kõljalg U, Nilsson RH, Abarenkov K et al (2013) Towards a unified paradigm for sequence-based identification of Fungi. Molec Ecol 22:5271–5277.  https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.12481 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Looney BP, Ryberg M, Hampe F, Sánchez-García M, Matheny PB (2016) Into and out of the tropics: global diversification patterns in a hyperdiverse clade of ectomycorrhizal fungi. Molec Ecol 25:630–647.  https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13506 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Marxmüller H (2014) Russularum icones, vol. 2. Anatis Verlag, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  24. Matheny PB (2005) Improving phylogenetic inference of mushrooms with RPB1 and RPB2 nucleotide sequences (Inocybe; Agaricales). Molec Phylogen Evol 35:1–20.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2004.11.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McNeill J, Barrie FR, Buck WR, Demoulin V, Greuter W, Hawksworth DL, Herendeen PS, Knapp S, Marhold K, Prado J (2012) International code of nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Melbourne Code) adopted by the eighteenth international botanical congress, Melbourne, Australia, July 2011. Regnum vegetabile 154, Koeltz scientific books, KönigsteinGoogle Scholar
  26. Rambaut A, Suchard MA, Xie D, Drummond AJ (2013) Tracer, version 1.6. Available at: http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/tracer. Accessed 30 Mar 2015
  27. Reumaux P, Bidaud A, Moënne-Loccoz P (1996) Russules rares ou méconnues. Fédération Mycologique Dauphiné-Savoie, La Roche-sur-ForonGoogle Scholar
  28. Romagnesi H (1967) Les Russules d’Europe et d’Afrique du Nord. Bordas, ParisGoogle Scholar
  29. Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Avres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP (2012) MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice, across a large model space. Syst Biol 61:539–542.  https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/sys029 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Ruotsalainen J, Vauras J (1994) Novelties in Russula: R. olivobrunnea, R. intermedia and R. groenlandica. Karstenia 34:21–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sarnari M (1998) Monographia Illustrata del Genere Russula in Europa, vol. 1. Associazione Micologica Bresadola, TrentoGoogle Scholar
  32. Sarnari M (2001) Sottogenere Russula sez. Russula sottosezione Urentes (supplemento) serie Formosa ad interim. Rivista Micol 44:63–70Google Scholar
  33. Sarnari M (2005) Monografia Illustrata del Genere Russula in Europa, vol. 2. Associazione Micologica Bresadola, TrentoGoogle Scholar
  34. Singer R (1962) Four interesting European Russulae of subsections Sardoninae and Urentinae, sect. Russula. Sydowia 16:289–301Google Scholar
  35. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S (2013) MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis, version 6.0. Molec Biol Evol 30:2725–2729.  https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst197 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Tassi G (2003) Étude de quelques récoltes intéressantes de russules. Bull Trimestriel Soc Mycol France 119:195–215Google Scholar
  37. White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ (eds) PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. Academic Press, New York, pp 315–322Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Plant Science and Biodiversity Centre SASInstitute of BotanyBratislavaSlovakia
  2. 2.Department of Botany, Faculty of Natural SciencesComenius University in BratislavaBratislavaSlovakia
  3. 3.HaguenauFrance
  4. 4.Faculte des Sciences Pharmaceutiques et Biologiques, Laboratoire IMPECSUniversité de LilleLilleFrance
  5. 5.Ghent UniversityGhentBelgium
  6. 6.Institute of MicrobiologyCzech Academy of SciencesPrague 4Czech Republic

Personalised recommendations