Advertisement

Plant Systematics and Evolution

, Volume 303, Issue 3, pp 337–369 | Cite as

Systematics, distribution and conservation of Cascabela (Apocynaceae: Rauvolfioideae: Plumerieae) in Mexico

  • Leonardo O. Alvarado-CárdenasEmail author
  • José L. Villaseñor
  • Lauro López-Mata
  • Joselin Cadena
  • Enrique Ortiz
Original Article

Abstract

Cascabela is a Neotropical genus of Apocynaceae with six species: C. balsaensis, C. gaumeri, C. ovata, C. pinifolia, C. thevetia and C. thevetioides. Its taxonomic history has long been a subject of controversy, especially due to its circumscription as a genus closely related to Thevetia. In this work, we revised the taxonomy of Cascabela for Mexico and provide detailed descriptions and illustrations. We also applied species distribution models and geographical information tools to evaluate chorological aspects of the six species occurring in Mexico and provide a conservation category. According to our results, Cascabela has a typical tropical distribution within Mexico, and the Balsas basin was identified as an area of diversity and endemism for the genus. The species C. ovata and C. thevetia have the broadest distribution ranges, and we assigned them the category of least concern. We suggest that the restricted, endemic species C. balsaensis, C. pinifolia and C. thevetioides be considered for protection. The genus was corroborated as an element of deciduous forest, and its cultural importance is highlighted.

Keywords

Chorology Species distribution models Taxonomy Thevetia 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The first author thanks CONACYT for a postdoctoral grant to carry out this work. We are thankful to the staff at the herbaria cited throughout the manuscript. We thank Lucio Lozada Pérez and Ernesto Velázquez Montes for their suggestions, which greatly improved this manuscript and Diego Alvarado C. for his help in compiling information on herbarium specimens into a database. Lynna M. Kiere reviewed the English version. We thank three anonymous reviewers, who improved previous version of the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Allorge L (1998) Les Thevetia, compagnons des succulentes. Succulentes 21:23–32Google Scholar
  2. Alvarado-Cárdenas LO (2004) Apocynaceae. In: Kelly L, Ochoterena H, Medina L (eds) Flora del Valle de Tehuacán-Cuicatlán, vol 38. Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, MexicoGoogle Scholar
  3. Alvarado-Cárdenas LO, Ochoterena H (2007) A phylogenetic analysis of the Cascabela-Thevetia species complex (Plumerieae, Apocynaceae) based on morphology. Ann Missouri Bot Gard 94:298–323. doi:10.3417/0026-6493(2007)94[298:APAOTC]2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alvarado-Cárdenas LO, Soto JC (2014) A new species of Cascabela (Apocynaceae; Rauvolfioideae, Plumerieae) from Michoacán, Mexico. Phytotaxa 177:163–170. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.177.3.4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson RP, Martínez-Meyer E (2004) Modeling species’ geographic distributions for preliminary conservation assessments: an implementation with the spiny pocket mice (Heteromys) of Ecuador. Biol Conservation 116:167–179. doi: 10.1007/s10531-006-9091-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arroyo TPF, Olson ME, García-Mendoza A, Solano E (2009) A GIS-based comparison of the Mexican national and IUCN methods for determining extinction risk. Conservation Biol 23:1156–1166. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01241.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bachman S, Moat J, Hill AW, de la Torre J, Scott B (2011) Supporting Red List threat assessments with GeoCAT: geospatial conservation assessment tool. In: Smith V, Penev L (eds) e-Infrastructures for data publishing in biodiversity science. ZooKeys 150: 117–126. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.150.2109
  8. Bivand R, Pebesma E, Gómez Rubio V (2008) Applied spatial data analysis with R. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Brooks TM, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, da Fonseca GAB, Rylands AB, Konstant WR, Flick P, Pilgrim J, Oldfield S, Magin G, Hilton-Taylor C (2002) Habitat loss and extinction in the hotspots of biodiversity. Conservation Biol 16:909–923. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00530.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Colwell RK (2009) EstimateS, Version 8.2.0: statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Software and User’s Guide. Available at: http://viceroy.eeb.uconn.edu/estimates
  11. Colwell RK, Coddington JA (1994) Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 345:101–118. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1994.0091 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Cruz-Cárdenas G, Villaseñor JL, López-Mata L, Ortiz E (2013) Distribución espacial de la riqueza de especies de plantas vasculares en México. Revista Mex Biodivers 84:1189–1199. doi: 10.7550/rmb.31811 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Diego-Pérez N (2004) Apocynaceae. In: Diego-Pérez D, Fonseca RM (eds) Flora de Guerrero 20. Las Prensas de Ciencias. Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, MexicoGoogle Scholar
  14. Elith J, Graham CH, Anderson RP, Dudik M, Ferrier S, Guisan A, Hijmans RJ, Huettmann F, Leathwick JR, Lehmann A, Li J, Lohmann LG, Loiselle BA, Manion G, Moritz C, Nakamura M, Nakazawa Y, Overton JM, Peterson AT, Phillips SJ, Richardson K, Scachetti-Pereira R, Schapire RE, Soberón J, Williams S, Wisz MS, Zimmermann NE (2006) Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence data. Ecography 29:129–151. doi: 10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04596.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Endress ME, Liede-Schumann S, Meve U (2014) An updated classification for Apocynaceae. Phytotaxa 159:175–194. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.159.3.2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Escalante T, Linaje M, Illoldi-Rangel MP, Estrada P, Neira F, Morrone JJ (2009) Ecological niche models and patterns of richness and endemism of the southern Andean genus Eurymetopum (Coleoptera, Cleridae). Rev Brasil Entomol 53:379–385. doi: 10.1590/S0085-56262009000300011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Escobar RR, Leiva AL, Morales EJ (2012) Intoxicación por Cascabela thevetia (L) Lippold (covadonga). Presentación de un caso. Medisur 10:55–57Google Scholar
  18. Esri Inc. (2009) ArcGIS 9·3. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands. Available at: http://www.esri.com
  19. Fallen ME (1983) A systematic revision of Anechites (Apocynaceae). Brittonia 35:222–231. doi: 10.2307/2806018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fallen ME (1985) The gynoecial development and systematic position of Allamanda (Apocynaceae). Amer J Bot 72:572–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fallen ME (1986) Floral structure in the Apocynaceae: morphological, functional and evolutionary aspects. Bot Jahrb Syst 106:245–286Google Scholar
  22. Fernández N, Rodríguez RC, Arreguín ML, Rodríguez A (1998) Listado florístico de la cuenca del Río Balsas, México. Polibotanica 9:1–151Google Scholar
  23. Ferrusquía-Villafranca L (1990) Provincias biogeográficas con base en rasgos morfotectónicos. Mapa IV.S.10. Atlas Nacional de México. Vol. III. Instituto de Geografía, UNAM, MexicoGoogle Scholar
  24. Fishbein M, Chuba D, Ellison C, Mason-Gamer RJ, Lynch SP (2011) Phylogenetic relationships of Asclepias (Apocynaceae) inferred from non-coding chloroplast DNA sequences. Syst Bot 36:1008–1023. doi: 10.1600/036364411X605010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. García CRA, Luna ZM (2013) Intoxicación por Thevetia peruviana (hueso o codo de fraile). Presentación de un caso. Revista Asoc Mex Med Crit Terap Intensiva 27:245–248Google Scholar
  26. Gensel WH (1969) A revision of the genus Thevetia (Apocynaceae). MSc Thesis, University of Connecticut, StorrsGoogle Scholar
  27. Gentry AH (1998) Apocynaceae. In: Stevens WD, Ulloa C, Pool UA, Montiel OM (eds) Flora de Nicaragua. Tomo 1. Monogr Syst Bot Missouri Bot Gard 85:116–132Google Scholar
  28. González YA, Peña M, Ágreda JP, Díaz M (2003) Intoxicación por la administración de tabletas de Thevetia peruviana como tratamiento para bajar de peso: presentación de un caso. Rev Toxicol 20:221–223Google Scholar
  29. González-Rocha E, Cerros-Tlatilpa R (2015) La familia Apocynaceae (Apocynoideae y Rauvolfioideae) en el Estado de Morelos, México. Acta Bot Mex 110:21–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gotelli NJ, Colwell RK (2001) Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecol Lett 4:379–391. doi: 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2001.00230.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Herbario CICY (2010) Flora de la Península de Yucatán. Available at: http://www.cicy.mx/sitios/flora%20digital/. Accessed 30 Jan 2016
  32. Herrera E, Rivera RR (2013) Caracterización de Thevetia spp., especies forestales con potencial económico en Yucatán. Folleto técnico No. 12. Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias, Centro de Investigación Regional Sureste Campo Experimental Mocochá, MexicoGoogle Scholar
  33. Hickey LJ, Wolfe JA (1975) The bases of angiosperm phylogeny: vegetative morphology. Ann Missouri Bot Gard 62:538–589. doi: 10.2307/2395267 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Instituto Nacional de Ecología (1999) Red del Sistema Nacional de Áreas Naturales Protegidas. Semarnat, Mexico, DFGoogle Scholar
  35. ITC 52° North (2007) ILWIS. Integrated Land and Eater Information System. Available at: http://www.itc.nl
  36. IUCN (2001) IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. IUCN. Species Survival Commission. IUCN, Gland and CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  37. IUCN Standards and Petitions Subcommittee (2013) Guidelines for Using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria. Version October.1. Prepared by the Standards and Petitions Subcommittee. Available at: http://www.iucnredlist.org/documents/RedListGuidelines.pdf. Accessed 20 Oct 2015
  38. Jiménez-Valverde A, Hortal LJ (2003) Las curvas de acumulación de especies y la necesidad de evaluar la calidad de los inventarios biológicos. Revista Iber Aracnol 8:151–161Google Scholar
  39. Juárez-Jaimes V, Alvarado-Cárdenas LO, Villaseñor JL (2007) La familia Apocynaceae sensu lato en México: diversidad y distribución. Revista Mex Biodivers 78:459–482Google Scholar
  40. Leavenworth WC (1946) A preliminar study of the vegetation of the region between Cerro Tancitaro and the Rio Tepalcatepec, Michoacan, Mexico. Amer Midl Naturalist 36:137–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Leeuwenberg AJM (1999) Series of revisions of Apocynaceae: 47. The genus Cerbera L. Wageningen Agric Univ Pap 98:1–64Google Scholar
  42. Lippold H (1980) Die Gattungen Thevetia L., Cerbera L. und Cascabela Rafin (Apocynaceae). Feddes Repert 91:45–55. doi: 10.1002/fedr.19800910109 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mas JF, Velásquez A, Díaz-Gallegos JR, Mayorga-Saucedo R, Alcantara C, Bocco G, Castro R, Fernández T, Pérez-Vega A (2004) Assessing land use/cover changes: a nationwide multidate spatial database for Mexico. Int J Appl Earth Observ Geoinform 5:249–261. doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2004.06.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Missouri Botanical Garden (2014) Tropicos.org. Available at: http://www.tropicos.org. Accessed 30 Jan 2016
  45. Moat J (2007) Conservation assessment tools, extension for ArcView 3.x, version 1.2. GIS Unit, Royal Botanic Gardens, KewGoogle Scholar
  46. Morales JF (2005) Estudios en las Apocynaceae Neotropicales XIX: la familia Apocynaceae (Apocynoideae, Rauvolfioideae) en Costa Rica. Darwiniana 43:90–191Google Scholar
  47. Morales JF (2009a) Estudios en las Apocynaceae neotropicales XXXIX: revisión de las Apocynoideae y Rauvolfioideae de Honduras. Anales Jard Bot Madrid 66:217–262. doi: 10.3989/ajbm.2205 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Morales JF (2009b) La familia Apocynaceae (Apocynoideae, Rauvolfioideae) en Guatemala. Darwiniana 47:140–184Google Scholar
  49. Nelson C (1996) La flora de Honduras en la Biología Centrali-Americana, de Hemsley. Fontqueria 44:53–68Google Scholar
  50. Ortega-Huerta MA, Peterson AT (2004) Modelling spatial patterns of biodiversity for conservation prioritization in North-eastern Mexico. Diversity Distrib 10:39–54. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2004.00051.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Palmas-Pérez S, Thorsten K, Dressler S, Arévalo-Ramírez J (2013) Diversidad y distribución de Marcgraviaceae en México. Revista Mex Biodivers 84:170–183. doi: 10.7550/rmb.29666 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pearson RG, Raxworthy JC, Nakamura M, Peterson AT (2007) Predicting species distribution from small numbers of occurrence records: a test case using cryptic geckos in Madagascar. J Biogeogr 34:102–117. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01594.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Phillips S, Dudik M (2008) Modeling of species distributions with MaxEnt: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. Ecography 31:161–175. doi: 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2008.5203.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Phillips S, Anderson R, Schapire R (2006) Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol Model 190:231–259. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pichon M (1948) Classification des Apocynacées. V. Cerbéroïdées. Notul Syst (Paris) 13:211–229Google Scholar
  56. Pichon M (1949) Classification des Apocynacées: XXVII. Determination des graines de Plumérioidées et de Cerbérioidées. Bull Mus Natl Hist Nat B 21:266–269Google Scholar
  57. Pichon M (1950) Classification des Apocynacées: XXXI. Le fruti des genres Thevetia et Ahovai. Bull Mus Natl Hist Nat B 21:291–294Google Scholar
  58. Plumel MM (1991) Le genre Himatanthus (Apocynaceae). Revision taxonomique. Bradea 5(suppl.):1–118Google Scholar
  59. QGIS Development Team (2012) QGIS Geographic Information System, Version 1.7.4. “Wroclaw”. Open Source Geographic Information System. Available at: http://www.qgis.org
  60. Rafinesque-Schmaltz CS (1838) Sylva Telluriana. Mantisa Synoptica. New genera and species of trees and shrubs of North AmericaGoogle Scholar
  61. Raxworthy CJ, Martinez-Meyer E, Horning N, Nussbaum RA, Schneider GE, Ortega-Huerta MA, Peterson AT (2003) Predicting distributions of known and unknown reptile species in Madagascar. Nature 426:837–841. doi: 10.1038/nature02205 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Reddy B (2009) Antimicrobial activity of Thevetia peruviana (Pers.) K. Schum. and Nerium indicum Linn. Internet. J Pharmacol 8:2Google Scholar
  63. Rodríguez JAA, Guido JSF, Garrido JT, Bojórquez MMC (2003) Nomenclatura, forma de vida, uso, manejo y distribución de las especies vegetales de la Península de Yucatán. Etnoflora Yucatanense. Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, MéridaGoogle Scholar
  64. Rzedowski J (1990) Vegetación Potencial. IV.8.2. Atlas Nacional de México. Vol II. Escala 1:4000000. Instituto de Geografía, UNAM, MéxicoGoogle Scholar
  65. Rzedowski J, Calderón de Rzedowski G (1998) Apocynaceae. In: Rzedowski J, Calderón de Rzedowski G (eds) Flora del Bajío y de Regiones Adyacentes 70. Instituto de Ecología, Centro Regional del Bajío. Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad, Pátzcuaro, MichoacánGoogle Scholar
  66. Rzedowski J, Calderón de Rzedowski G (2013) Datos para la apreciación de la flora fanerogámica del bosque tropical caducifolio de México. Acta Bot Mex 102:1–23. doi: 10.21829/abm.102.2013.229 Google Scholar
  67. Sánchez-Cordero V, Iloldi-Rangel P, Linaje M, Sarkar S, Peterson AT (2005) Deforestation and extant distributions of Mexican endemic mammals. Biol Conservation 126:465–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Shuguftha N, Sulthana S (2013) An updated review on the genus Cascabela plant family: Apocynaceae. Int J Pharma Chem Sci 2:1474–1477. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.06.022 Google Scholar
  69. Simões AO, Endress ME, van der Niet T, Kinoshita LS, Conti E (2004) Tribal and intergeneric relationships of Mesechiteae (Apocynoideae, Apocynaceae): evidence from three noncoding plastid DNA regions and morphology. Amer J Bot 91:1409–1418. doi: 10.3732/ajb.91.9.1409 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Simões AO, Endress ME, van der Niet T, Kinoshita LS, Conti E (2006) Is Mandevilla (Apocynaceae, Mesechiteae) monophyletic? Evidence from five plastid DNA loci and morphology. Ann Missouri Bot Gard 93:565–591. doi:10.3417/0026-6493(2006)93[565:IMAMME]2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Simões AO, Livshultz T, Conti E, Endress ME (2007) Phylogeny and systematics of the Rauvolfioideae (Apocynaceae) based on molecular and morphological evidence. Ann Missouri Bot Gard 94:268–297. doi:10.3417/0026-6493(2007)94[268:PASOTR]2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Smith CE (1967) Plants remains. In: Byers DS (ed) The prehistory of the Tehuacan Valley. Enviroment and subsistence, vol 1. University of Texas, Austin, pp 220–225Google Scholar
  73. Soberón JM (2010) Niche and area of distribution modeling: a population ecology perspective. Ecography 33:159–167. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2009.06074.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Soberón JM, Llorente JB (1993) The use of species accumulation functions for the prediction of species richness. Conservation Biol 7:480–488. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1993.07030480.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Solano E, Feria TP (2007) Ecological niche modeling and geographic distribution of the genus Polianthes L. (Agavaceae) in Mexico: using niche modeling to improve assessments of risk status. Biodivers Conservation 16:1885–1900. doi: 10.1007/s10531-006-9091-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Sosa V, De-Nova JA (2012) Endemic angiosperm lineages in Mexico: hotspots for conservation. Acta Bot Mex 100:293–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Sousa M, Soto JC (1987) Nuevos taxa de Lonchocarpus (Leguminosae) de las cuencas baja y media del Río Balsas, México. Anales Inst Biol Univ Nac Autón México Bot 58:63–86Google Scholar
  78. Sowjanya KM, Narendra K, Swathi J, Krishna A (2013) Phytochemical Extraction and Antimicrobial Efficiency of Crude Leaf Extract of Medicinal Plant Cascabela thevetia. Int J Res Pharma Biomed Sci 4:465–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. StatSoft Inc (2011) STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 10. StatSoft, Tulsa. Available at: www.statsoft.com
  80. Suárez-Mota ME, Villaseñor JL (2011) Las Compuestas endémicas de Oaxaca, México: diversidad y distribución. Bol Soc Bot México 88:55–66. doi: 10.17129/botsci.308 Google Scholar
  81. The Plant List (2013) A working list of all plant species. Version 1.1. Royal Botanic Gardens and Missouri Botanical Garden, Kew and St. Louis. Available at: http://www.theplantlist.org/. Accessed 30 Jan 2016
  82. Thiers B (2016) Index herbariorum: a global directory of public herbaria and associated staff. New York Botanical Garden’s Virtual Herbarium. Available at: http://sweetgum.nybg.org/ih. Accessed Feb 2016
  83. Torresín JA, Zamboni LP, Sione WF, Rodríguez E, Aceñolaza PG (2013) Modelado de la distribución espacial de árboles exóticos invasores (AEI) en el Parque Nacional Pre-Delta (Entre Ríos, Argentina). Multequina 22:1–11Google Scholar
  84. Veillon JM (1971) Une Apocynace´e monocarpique deNouvelle-Caledonie Cerberiopsis candelabrum Vieill. Adansonia 11:625–639Google Scholar
  85. Villaseñor JL (2003) Diversidad y distribución de las Magnoliophyta de México. Interciencia 28:160–167Google Scholar
  86. Villaseñor JL (2004) Los géneros de plantas vasculares de la flora de México. Bol Soc Bot México 75:105–135Google Scholar
  87. Villaseñor JL, Ortiz E (2014) Biodiversidad de las plantas con flores (División Magnoliophyta) en México. Revista Mex Biodivers 85:134–142. doi: 10.7550/rmb.31987 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Villaseñor JL, Ortiz E, Cadena J, Estrada AS (2013) Patrones de riqueza florística en el estado de Jalisco: La tribu Senecioneae (Asteraceae) como estudio de caso. Ibugana 4:63–78Google Scholar
  89. Warren DL, Glor RE, Turelli M (2009) ENMTools: a toolbox for comparative studies of environmental niche models. Version 1.4.3. Ecography 33:607–611. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2009.06142.x
  90. Wiens JJ, Ackerly DD, Allen AP, Anacker BL, Buckley LB, Cornell HV, Stephens PR (2010) Niche conservatism as an emerging principle in ecology and conservation biology. Ecol Lett 13:1310–1324. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01515.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Williams JK (1996a) A new combination in Thevetia (Apocynaceae). Sida 17:185–190Google Scholar
  92. Williams JK (1996b) The Mexican genera of the Apocynaceae (sensu A. DC.), with key and additional taxonomic notes. Sida 17:197–213Google Scholar
  93. Williams JK, Stutzman JK (2008) Chromosome number of Thevetia ahouai (Apocynaceae: Rauvolfoidae: Plumerieae) with discussion on the generic boundaries of Thevetia. J Bot Res Inst Texas 2:489–493Google Scholar
  94. Woodson RE Jr (1937) New otherwise noteworthy Apocynaceae of tropical America V. Ann Missouri Bot Gard 24:14–16. doi: 10.2307/2394212 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Woodson RE Jr (1938a) Apocynaceae. In: Britton NL, Murrill WA, Barnhart JH (eds) North American Flora 29. The New York Botanical Garden, New York, pp 103–192Google Scholar
  96. Woodson RE Jr (1938b) Studies in the Apocynaceae. VII. An evaluation of the genera Plumeria L. and Himatanthus Willd. Ann Missouri Bot Gard 25:189–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Woodson RE Jr (1939) New and otherwise noteworthy Apocynaceae of tropical America VI. Ann Missouri Bot Gard 26:95–98. doi: 10.2307/2394479 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Yepez F, Arboleda M (2009) Promoción de la emergencia en urape (Bauhinia monandra Kurz) y (Thevetia peruviana (Pers) K. Schum), especies potenciales para la arboricultura urbana. Rev Bioagro 21:15–22Google Scholar
  99. Zarucchi JL (2009) Thevetia. In: Davidse G, Sousa SM, Knapp S, Chiang F (eds) Flora Mesoamericana, Vol. 4(1). Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Biología, Missouri Botanical Garden, The Natural History Museum, Mexico City, St. Louis, London, pp 700–701Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de Biología Comparada, Facultad de CienciasUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoMexicoMexico
  2. 2.Departamento de Botánica, Instituto de BiologíaUNAMMexicoMexico
  3. 3.Programa de BotánicaColegio de PostgraduadosMontecilloMexico

Personalised recommendations