Plant Systematics and Evolution

, Volume 301, Issue 4, pp 1227–1248 | Cite as

The Lucilia group (Asteraceae, Gnaphalieae): phylogenetic and taxonomic considerations based on molecular and morphological evidence

  • Susana E. Freire
  • M. Amelia Chemisquy
  • Arne A. Anderberg
  • Stephan G. Beck
  • Rosa I. Meneses
  • Benoît Loeuille
  • Estrella Urtubey
Original Article

Abstract

The Lucilia group sensu Anderberg and Freire comprises nine South American genera: Belloa, Berroa, Chevreulia, Cuatrecasasiella, Facelis, Gamochaetopsis, Jalcophila, Lucilia and Luciliocline. The aims of this contribution were, using DNA sequences from plastid (rpl32-trnL, trnL-F) and nuclear (ITS and ETS) markers, together with morphological characters, to test the monophyly of the Lucilia group and provide new insight into generic circumscriptions. Our studies, including a broad taxon sampling of Gnaphalieae species, suggest that the Lucilia group is paraphyletic, since Antennaria, Chionolaena, Gamochaeta, Loricaria, Micropsis, Mniodes and Stuckertiella are all nested within the Lucilia group. Morphology and molecular analyses combined showed that the traditional generic circumscription of most of the genera (e.g., Berroa, Chevreulia, Chionolaena, Cuatrecasasiella, Facelis, Jalcophila and Micropsis) correlates with the inferred phylogenetic relationships. Conversely, Lucilia and Luciliocline are non-monophyletic. Lucilia is nested in a clade with Berroa, Facelis and Micropsis. Luciliocline is strongly embedded within the clade Belloa pp + Mniodes. Our results are consistent with Dillon’s study that considered Belloa as a montotypic genus (B. chilensis). Luciliocline and the remaining species of Belloa are accommodated in the genus Mniodes, and the necessary combinations are proposed for the expanded Mniodes. All the analyses showed that the monotypic genera Stuckertiella and Gamochaetopsis are in a well-supported clade nested within Gamochaeta, which implies that taxonomic changes are required also for these genera. Internal relationships in the group and the key morphological characters used in the taxonomy of the group, as well as incongruences found between morphological and molecular analyses, are discussed.

Keywords

Belloa ETS ITS Mniodes rpl32-trntrnL-F 

Supplementary material

606_2014_1147_MOESM1_ESM.doc (58 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 57 kb)
606_2014_1147_MOESM2_ESM.doc (30 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOC 29 kb)

References

  1. Anderberg AA (1991) Taxonomy and phytogeny of the tribe Gnaphalieae (Asteraceae). Opera Bot 104:1–195Google Scholar
  2. Anderberg AA, Freire SE (1990a) Luciliopsis perpusilla Wedd. is a species of Chaetanthera Ruiz and Pavon (Asteraceae). Taxon 39:430–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderberg AA, Freire SE (1990b) Jalcophila boliviensis, a new species of South American Asteraceae (Gnaphalieae). Brittonia 42:138–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderberg AA, Freire SE (1991) A cladistic and biogeographic analysis of the Lucilia group (Asteraceae, Gnaphalieae). Bot J Linn Soc 106:173–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baldwin BG, Markos S (1998) Phylogenetic utility of the external transcribed spacer (ETS) of 18S–26S rDNA: congruence of ETS and ITS trees of Calycadenia (Compositae). Molec Phylogen Evol 10:449–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bayer RJ, Puttock CF, Kelchner SA (2000) Phylogeny of South African Gnaphalieae (Asteraceae) based on two noncoding chloroplast sequences. Amer J Bot 87:259–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bayer RJ, Greber DG, Bagnall NH (2002) Phylogeny of Australian Gnaphalieae (Asteraceae) based on four sequences, four sequences, the trnL intron, trnL/trnF intergenic spacer, matK, and ETS. Syst Bot 27:801–814Google Scholar
  8. Beauverd G (1913a) Contribution à l’étude des Composées 8(2). Le genre Berroa extrait des Lucilia. Bull Soc Bot Genéve 2(5):210–212Google Scholar
  9. Beauverd G (1913b) Contribution à l’étude des Composées 8(3). Le genre Facelis Cassini (emend. Beauverd). Bull Soc Bot Genève 2(5):212–220Google Scholar
  10. Beauverd G (1913c) Contribution à l’étude des Composées 8(4). Le genre Micropsis DC. (emend. Beauverd). Bull Soc Bot Genève 2(5):221–228Google Scholar
  11. Beauverd G (1913d) Contribution à l’étude des Composées 8(1). Le genre Stuckertiella Beauverd. Bull Soc Bot Genève 2(5):205–209Google Scholar
  12. Bergh NG, Linder HP (2009) Cape diversification and repeated out of-southern-Africa dispersal in paper daisies (Asteraceae-Gnaphalieae). Molec Phylogen Evol 51:5–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cabrera AL (1958) El género Belloa Rémy. Bol Soc Argent Bot 7:79–85Google Scholar
  14. Chouksanova NA, Sveshnikova LI, Alexandrova TV (1968) Data on karyology of the family Compositae Giseke. Citologija 10:198–206Google Scholar
  15. Cuatrecasas J (1954a) Synopsis der Gattung Loricaria Wedd. Feddes Repert Spec Nov Regni Veg 56:149–172Google Scholar
  16. Cuatrecasas J (1954b) El género Mniodes. Folia Biol Andina 1:17Google Scholar
  17. Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R, Posada D (2012) jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat Methods 9:772CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. De Jong DCD, Longpre EK (1963) Chromosome studies in Mexican Compositae. Rhodora 65:225–240Google Scholar
  19. Dillon MO (2000) Clasification and phylogeny of the South American Gnaphalieae (Asteraceae). In: Andean Botanical Information System. http://www.sacha.org/Gnaphalieae/Gnaphalieae.htm. Accessed September 2013
  20. Dillon MO (2003) New combinations in Luciliocline with notes on South American Gnaphalieae. Arnaldoa 10:45–60Google Scholar
  21. Dillon MO, Sagástegui-Alva A (1985) New species and combinations in Belloa (Inuleae-Asteraceae). Phytologia 58:392–400Google Scholar
  22. Dillon MO, Sagástegui-Alva A (1986) Jalcophila, a new genus of Andean Inuleae (Asteraceae). Brittonia 38:162–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dillon MO, Sagástegui-Alva A (1991) Tribe Inuleae. In: Macbride JF et al. (eds) Flora of Peru, Family Asteraceae: Part V. Fieldiana Bot n.s. 26:1–70Google Scholar
  24. Dillon MO, Sagástegui-Alva A (1992) Sinopsis de los géneros de Gnaphaliinae (Asteraceae-Inuleae) de Sudamérica. Arnaldoa 1:5–91Google Scholar
  25. Doyle JJ, Dickson EE (1987) Preservation of plant samples for DNA restriction endonuclease analysis. Taxon 36:715–722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Farris JS, Albert VA, Källersjö M, Lipscomb D, Kluge AG (1996) Parsimony jackknifing outperforms neighbor-joining. Cladistics 12:99–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fernández Casas J, Fernández Piqueras J (1981) Estudio cariológico de algunas plantas bolivianas. Anales Jard Bot Madrid 38:149–152Google Scholar
  28. Freire SE (1986a) Novenia: Nuevo género de Inuleae (Compositae). Bol Soc Argent Bot 24:295–304Google Scholar
  29. Freire SE (1986b) Revisión del género Lucilia (Compositae, Inuleae). Darwiniana 27:431–490Google Scholar
  30. Freire SE (1986c) Números cromosómicos en el género Lucilia (Compositae, Inuleae). Bol Soc Argent Bot 24:411–413Google Scholar
  31. Freire SE (1987) Nuevos sinónimos y una nueva combinación en el género Lucilia (Compositae, Inuleae). Darwiniana 28:409–411Google Scholar
  32. Freire SE (1989) Oligandra Less. is Lucilia Cass. (Compositae, Inuleae). Taxon 38:298–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Freire SE (1993) A revision of Chionolaena (Compositae, Gnaphalieae). Ann Missouri Bot Gard 80:397–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Freire SE, Iharlegui L (1997) Sinopsis preliminar del género Gamochaeta (Asteraceae, Gnaphalieae). Bol Soc Argent Bot 33:23–35Google Scholar
  35. Galbany-Casals M, Andres-Sanchez S, Garcia-Jacas N, Susanna A, Rico E, Martinez-Ortega MM (2010) How many of Cassini anagrams should there be? Molecular systematics and phylogenetic relationships in the Filago group (Asteraceae, Gnaphalieae), with special focus on the genus Filago. Taxon 59:671–1689Google Scholar
  36. Goloboff PA, Farris JS, Källersjö M, Oxelman B, Ramírez MI, Szumik CA (2003) Improvements to resampling measures of group support. Cladistics 19:324–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Goloboff PA, Farris JS, Nixon K (2008) TNT, a free program for phylogenetic analysis. Cladistics 24:774–786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Guindon S, Gascuel O (2003) A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst Biol 52:696–704CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Hall TA (1999) BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucl Acids Symp Ser 41:95–98Google Scholar
  40. Hind DJN (2011) An annotated preliminary checklist of the Compositae of Bolivia, version 2. http://www.kew.org/science/tropamerica/boliviacompositae and http://www.kew.org/science/tropamerica/boliviacompositae/checklist.pdf. Accessed 7 March 2014
  41. Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F (2001) MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17:754–755CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Jörgensen CA, Sørensen TH, Westergaard M (1958) The flowering plants of Greenland. A taxonomical and cytological survey. Biol Skr Vidensk Selskab 9(4):1–72Google Scholar
  43. Juel HO (1900) Vergleichende Untersuchungen uber typische und parthenogenetische Fort-pflanzung bei der Gattung Antennaria. Kg Svenska Vet Ak Handl 33(5):1–59Google Scholar
  44. Katoh K, Misawa K, Kuma K-I, Miyata T (2002) MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res 30:3059–3066CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Lewis PO (2001) A likelihood approach to estimating phylogeny from discrete morphological character data. Syst Biol 50:913–925CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Loeuille B, Deble L, Nakajima JN (2011) Four new species of Chionolaena (Asteraceae: Gnaphalieae) from south-eastern Brazil. Kew Bull 66:263–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Löve A, Löve D (1982a) IOPB chromosome number reports 75. Taxon 31:344–360Google Scholar
  48. Löve A, Löve D (1982b) IOPB chromosome number reports 77. Taxon 31:766–768Google Scholar
  49. Merxmüller H, Leins P, Roessler H (1977) Inuleae-systematic review. In: Heywood VH, Harborne JB, Turner BL (eds) The biology and chemistry of the Compositae. Academic Press, London, pp 577–602Google Scholar
  50. Moore DM (1981) Chromosome numbers of Fuegian angiosperms. Bol Soc Brot 53:995–1012Google Scholar
  51. Nesom GL (1990a) Taxonomic status of Gamochaeta (Asteraceae: Inuleae) and the species of the United States. Phytologia 68:186–198Google Scholar
  52. Nesom GL (1990b) An additional species of Gnaphaliothamnus (Asteraceae: Inuleae) and further evidence for the integrity of the genus. Phytologia 69(1):1–3Google Scholar
  53. Nesom GL (1990c) Taxonomy of Gnaphaliothamnus (Asteraceae: Inuleae). Phytologia 68(5):366–381Google Scholar
  54. Nesom GL (2001) New combinations in Chionolaena (Asteraceae: Gnaphalieae). Sida 19:849–852Google Scholar
  55. Nixon KC, Carpenter JM (1996) On simultaneous analysis. Cladistics 12:221–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Packer JG, McPherson GD (1974) Chromosome numbers in some vascular plants from northern Alaska. Can J Bot 52:1095–1099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rémy EJ (1847) Compuestas, Belloa. In: Gay C (ed) Historia física y política de Chile, Botánica 3(3). En casa del autor, Paris, pp 336–338Google Scholar
  58. Robinson H (1985) In honor of the botanical career of José Cuatrecasas. In: Flora Neotropica, 2 Supplement. Brunelliaceae. pp 13–16Google Scholar
  59. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP (2003) MRBAYES 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:1572–1574CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Shaw J, Lickey EB, Schilling EE, Small RL (2007) Comparison of whole chloroplast genome sequences to choose noncoding regions for phylogenetic studies in angiosperms: the tortoise and the hare III. Amer J Bot 94:275–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Smissen RD, Galbany-Casals M, Breitwieser I (2011) Ancient allopolyploidy in the everlasting daisies (Asteraceae: Gnaphalieae): complex relationships among extant clades. Taxon 60:649–662Google Scholar
  62. Spooner DM, De Jong DCD, Sun BY, Stuessy TF, Gengler KM, Nesom GL, Berry PE (1995) Chromosome counts of Compositae from Ecuador and Venezuela. Ann Missouri Bot Gard 82:596–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Taberlet P, Gielly L, Pautou G, Bouvet J (1991) Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Pl Molec Biol 17:105–1109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Turner BL, Powell AM, Cuatrecasas J (1967) Chromosome numbers in Compositae. XI Peruvian species. Ann Missouri Bot Gard 54:172–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Urbanska-Worytkiewicz K (1967) Cytological Investigations in Antennaria Gaertn. from North Scandinavia. Acta Boreal, A 22:1–14Google Scholar
  66. Ward J, Bayer RJ, Breitwieser I, Smissen R, Galbany-Casals M, Unwin M (2009) Gnaphalieae. In: Funk VA, Susanna A, Stuessy TF, Bayer RJ (eds) Systematics, Evolution, and Biogeography of Compositae. International Association for Plant Taxonomy, Vienna, pp 539–588Google Scholar
  67. White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Shinsky JJ, White TJ (eds) PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 315–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wilgenbusch JC, Warren DL, Swofford DL (2004) AWTY: a system for graphical exploration of MCMC convergence in Bayesian phylogenetic inference. http://ceb.csit.fsu.edu/awty. Accessed 2 November 2013

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susana E. Freire
    • 1
  • M. Amelia Chemisquy
    • 2
  • Arne A. Anderberg
    • 3
  • Stephan G. Beck
    • 4
  • Rosa I. Meneses
    • 4
  • Benoît Loeuille
    • 5
  • Estrella Urtubey
    • 1
  1. 1.Instituto de Botánica Darwinion-CONICETSan IsidroArgentina
  2. 2.Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia”-CONICETCiudad Autónoma de Buenos AiresArgentina
  3. 3.Swedish Musem of Natural HistoryStockholmSweden
  4. 4.Herbario Nacional de Bolivia, Museo Nacional de Historia NaturalUniversidad Mayor de San AndrésLa PazBolivia
  5. 5.Departamento de BotânicaLaboratório de Sistemática VegetalSão PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations