Plant Systematics and Evolution

, Volume 299, Issue 10, pp 1991–2001 | Cite as

Leaf dimorphism in Thuja plicata and Platycladus orientalis (thujoid Cupressaceae s. str., Coniferales): the changes in morphology and anatomy from juvenile needle leaves to mature scale leaves

Original Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Thuja plicata and Platycladus orientalis initially produce only bifacial needle leaves. When the first lateral shoots develop, the leaf morphology and anatomy changes dramatically. Subsequently, only greatly reduced, bifacial scale leaves are developed. A new kind of “superimposed bifaciality” occurs with the change from juvenile needle leaves to mature scale leaves. Anatomical dorsiventrality affects not only the individual leaf, but also the complete plagiotropic lateral shoots of Thuja, which have a sun- and shade-exposed side. The upper light-exposed median leaves show adaxial leaf anatomy, contrary to the lower shaded median leaves showing abaxial leaf anatomy. Due to their mixed exposure, the lateral leaves show a lateral differentiation. At vertical lateral shoots of Platycladus, a predominant light-exposed side is absent. Thus, the anatomical dorsiventrality does not affect the complete shoot. Here the morphological abaxial side of a scale leaf becomes functionally and physiologically adaxial by reorientation of the palisade parenchyma and stomata. In juvenile needle leaves, the palisade parenchyma is located adaxial, with the majority of stomata being located abaxial. Conversely, in mature scale leaves, the palisade parenchyma is abaxial and the majority of stomata are adaxial.

Keywords

Thuja Platycladus Gymnosperms Dimorphism Leaf Needle Abscission 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

I thank Mr. Jörn Kruthoff (forest nursery Güstrow Leist & Co. KG, Klueß/Devwinkel, Germany) for generously providing seeds of Thuja plicata, the Botanic Garden of the University of Stuttgart-Hohenheim (Germany) for seeds of Platycladus orientalis and the Botanic Garden of the Ruhr-University Bochum (Germany) for branches of mature individuals. I also thank Mr. Otmar Ficht (Botanic Garden of the University Konstanz, Germany) for growing the seedlings and Dr. Joachim Hentschel and Ms. Lauretta Nejedli (Department of Biology, Electron Microscopy Center, University of Konstanz, Germany) for technical support (paraffin technique). Furthermore, I thank Dr. Paula Rudall (Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, United Kingdom) for critical comments on an earlier version of the manuscript and Ms. Ingrid M. Skorobohaty, BA English (Oakland, USA) for linguistic support.

References

  1. Bärtels A, Roloff A (1996) Gartenflora Band 1. Ulmer, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  2. Dallimore W, Jackson AB (1966) A handbook of Coniferae and Ginkgoaceae, 4th edn. Edward Arnold (Publisher) LTD., LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. De Laubenfels DJ (1953) The external morphology of coniferous leaves. Phytomorph 3(1–2):1–20Google Scholar
  4. Dörken VM (2012) The evolutionary relevance of vegetative long-shoot/short-shoot differentiation in gymnospermous tree species. Bibliot. Bot. 161. Schweitzerbart Science Publishers, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  5. Dörken VM, Stützel Th (2009) The adaptive value of shoot differentiation in deciduous trees and its evolutionary relevance. Bol Soc Argent Bot 44(3–4):421–439Google Scholar
  6. Dörken VM, Stützel TH (2011) Morphology and anatomy of anomalous cladodes in Sciadopitys verticillata Siebold & Zucc. (Sciadopityaceae). Trees 25:199–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dörken VM, Stützel Th (2012a) Das Gymnospermenblatt—eine homologe Struktur? Mitt Dtsch Dendrol Ges 97:133–150Google Scholar
  8. Dörken VM, Stützel Th (2012b) Morphology, anatomy and vasculature of leaves in Pinus (Pinaceae) and their evolutionary meaning. Flora 207(1):57–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eckenwalder JE (2009) Conifers of the world. Timber Press, PortlandGoogle Scholar
  10. Farjon A (1984) Pines, drawings and descriptions of the genus Pinus. Brill, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  11. Farjon A (2005) A monograph of Cupressaceae and Sciadopityaceae. Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, RichmondGoogle Scholar
  12. Farjon A (2010a) A handbook of the world’s conifers, vol I. Brill, LeidenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Farjon A (2010b) A handbook of the world’s conifers, vol II. Brill, LeidenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Feustel H (1921) Anatomie und Biologie der Gymnospermenblätter. Beih Bot Centralbl 38(2):177–253Google Scholar
  15. Fitting H (1950) Weitere Beobachtungen über die Induktion der Dorsiventralität in den blattartigen Zweigsystemen von Cupressaceen. Planta 37:676–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gerlach D (1984) Botanische Mikrotomtechnik, eine Einführung, 2nd edn. Thieme, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  17. Hille N (2002) Vergleichende Studien zur Anatomie und Histogenese von Gymnospermenblättern. Ruhr-University Bochum, DiplomaGoogle Scholar
  18. Imamura SL (1937) Über die aitiogene Dorsiventralität der Assimilationsorgane bei höheren Pflanzen. Bot Mag 61(606):308–316Google Scholar
  19. Ivanescu L, Toma C, Rugina R (2007) Histo-anatomical researches regarding some species of Cupressaceae. Analele stiintifice ale Universitatii “Al. I. Cuza” Iasi Tomul 53, s. 2 a. Biologie vegetatla 2007:34–39Google Scholar
  20. Krüssmann G (1983) Handbuch der Nadelgehölze, 2nd edn. Parey, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  21. Langner W (1963) Die Entstehung sogenannter Jugendformen bei Chamaecyparis. Silv Gen 13(3):57–63Google Scholar
  22. Little DP (2006) Evolution and circumscription of the true Cypresses (Cupressaceae: Cupressus). Syst Bot 31(3):461–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Liu TS (1971) A monograph of the genus Abies. National Tapei University, TaipeiGoogle Scholar
  24. Napp-Zinn K (1966) Anatomie des Blattes. I. Blattanatomie der Gymnospermen. Bornträger, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  25. Pittermann J, Choat B, Jansen S, Stuart SA, Lynn L, Dawson TE (2010) The relationships between xylem safety and hydraulic efficiency in the Cupressaceae: the evolution of pit membrane form and function. Plant Physiol 153:1919–1931PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schreiber L, Breiner HW, Riederer M, Düggeling M, Guggenheim R (1994) The Casparian strip of Clivia miniata Reg. roots: isolation, fine structure and chemical nature. Bot Acta 107:353–361Google Scholar
  27. Tetzlaf M (2005) Die Anatomie des Gymnospermenblattes unter funktionellen und evolutiven Gesichtspunkten. Diploma, Ruhr-University Bochum, BochumGoogle Scholar
  28. Wagenitz G (2003) Wörterbuch der Botanik, 2nd edn. Nicol, HamburgGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of KonstanzConstanceGermany

Personalised recommendations