Plant Systematics and Evolution

, Volume 298, Issue 2, pp 257–276

Progress and problems in the assessment of flower morphology in higher-level systematics



Floral features used for characterization of higher-level angiosperm taxa (families, orders, and above) are assessed following a comparison of earlier (precladistic/premolecular) and current classifications. Cronquist (An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. Columbia University Press, New York, 1981) and APG (Angiosperm Phylogeny Group) (Bot J Linn Soc 161:105–121, 2009) were mainly used as the basis for this comparison. Although current circumscriptions of taxonomic groups (clades) are largely based on molecular markers, it is also important to morphologically characterize these new groups, as, in many cases, they are completely novel assemblages, especially at the level of orders and above. Features used in precladistic/premolecular classifications are often much more evolutionarily plastic than earlier assumed. A number of earlier neglected but potentially useful features at higher levels are discussed based on our own and other recent studies. As certain features tend to evolve repeatedly in a clade, it appears that apomorphic features in the strict sense are less helpful to characterize larger clades than earlier assumed, and rather apomorphic tendencies of features are more useful at this level.


Androecium Angiosperms Apomorphic tendencies Flower morphology Gynoecium Higher classification Orders Ovules Perianth 


  1. Albert VA, Williams SE, Chase MW (1992) Carnivorous plants: phylogeny and structural evolution. Science 257:1491–1495PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alford MH (2006) Gerrardinaceae: a new family of African flowering plants unresolved among Brassicales, Huerteales, Malvales, and Sapindales. Taxon 55:959–964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderberg AA, Zhang X (2002) Phylogenetic relationships of Cyrillaceae and Clethraceae (Ericales) with special emphasis on the genus Purdiaea Planch. Org Divers Evol 2:127–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderberg AA, Rydin C, Källersjö M (2002) Phylogenetic relationships in the order Ericales s.l.: analyses of molecular data from five genes from the plastid and mitochondrial genomes. Am J Bot 89:677–687PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. APG (Angiosperm Phylogeny Group) (1998) An ordinal classification for the families of flowering plants. Ann Mo Bot Gard 85:531–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. APG (Angiosperm Phylogeny Group) (2009) An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III. Bot J Linn Soc 161:105–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bachelier JB, Endress PK (2008) Floral structure of Kirkia (Kirkiaceae) and its position in Sapindales. Ann Bot 102:539–550PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bachelier JB, Endress PK (2009) Comparative floral morphology and anatomy of Anacardiaceae and Burseraceae (Sapindales), with a special focus on gynoecium structure and evolution. Bot J Linn Soc 159:499–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bartlett ME, Specht CD (2010) Evidence for the involvement of GLOBOSA-like gene duplications and expression divergence in the evolution of floral morphology in the Zingiberales. New Phytol 187:521–541PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Baum-Leinfellner H (1953) Über unifaziale Griffel und Narben. Planta 42:452–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bayer C, Fay MF, de Bruijn AJ, Savolainen V, Morton CM, Kubitzki K, Alverson WS, Chase MW (1999) Support for an expanded family concept of Malvaceae within a recircumscribed order Malvales: a combined analysis of plastid atpB and rbcL DNA sequences. Bot J Linn Soc 129:267–303Google Scholar
  12. Behnke H-D (1997) Sarcobataceae—a new family of Caryophyllales. Taxon 46:495–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bello MA, Hawkins JA, Rudall PJ (2007) Floral morphology and development in Quillajaceae and Surianaceae (Fabales), the species-poor relatives of Leguminosae and Polygalaceae. Ann Bot 100:1491–1505PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bello MA, Bruneau A, Forest F, Hawkins JA (2009) Elusive relationships within order Fabales: phylogenetic analyses using matK and rbcL sequence data. Syst Bot 34:102–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bello MA, Hawkins JA, Rudall PJ (2010) Floral ontogeny in Polygalaceae and its bearing on the homologies of keeled flowers in Fabales. Int J Plant Sci 171:482–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bernhard A (1999) Flower structure, development, and systematics in Passifloraceae and in Abatia (Flacourtiaceae). Int J Plant Sci 160:135–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bernhard A, Endress PK (1999) Androecial development and systematics in Flacourtiaceae s.l. Plant Syst Evol 215:141–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Blarer A, Nickrent D, Endress PK (2004) Floral structure and systematics in Apodanthaceae (Rafflesiales). Plant Syst Evol 245:119–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Brockington SF, Alexandre R, Ramdial J, Moore MJ, Crawley S, Dhingra A, Hilu K, Soltis PS, Soltis DE (2009) Phylogeny of the Caryophyllales sensu lato: revisiting hypotheses on pollination biology and perianth differentiation in the core Caryophyllales. Int J Plant Sci 171:185–198Google Scholar
  20. Brückner C (2000) Clarification of the carpel number in Papaverales, Capparales, and Berberidaceae. Bot Rev 66:155–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cameron KM (2003) On the phylogenetic position of the New Caledonian endemic families Paracryphiaceae, Oncothecaceae, and Strasburgeriaceae: a comparison of molecules and morphology. Bot Rev 68:428–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Chase MW, Soltis DE, Olmstead RG, Morgan D, Les DH, Mishler BD, Duvall MR, Price RA, Hills HG, Qiu Y-L, Kron KA, Rettig JH, Conti E, Palmer JD, Manhart JR, Sytsma KJ, Michaels HJ, Kress WJ, Karol KG, Clark WD, Hedrén M, Gaut BS, Jansen RK, Kim K-J, Wimpee CF, Smith JF, Furnier GR, Strauss SH, Xiang Q-Y, Plunkett GM, Soltis PS, Swensen SM, Williams SE, Gadek PA, Quinn CJ, Eguiarte LE, Golenberg E, Learn GH Jr, Graham SW, Barrett SCH, Dayanandan S, Albert VA (1993) Phylogenetics of seed plants: an analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid gene rbcL. Ann Mo Bot Gard 80:528–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Chase MW, Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Rudall PJ, Fay MF, Hahn WH, Sullivan S, Joseph J, Molvray M, Kores PJ, Givnish TJ, Sytsma KJ, Pires JC (2000) Higher-level systematics of the monocotyledons: an assessment of current knowledge and a new classification. In: Wilson KL, Morrison DA (eds) Monocots: systematics and evolution. CSIRO, Melbourne, pp 3–16Google Scholar
  24. Chen L, Ren Y, Endress PK, Tian XH, Zhang XH (2007) Floral development of Tetracentron sinense (Trochodendraceae) and its systematic significance. Plant Syst Evol 264:183–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Christenhusz MJM, Fay MF, Clarkson JJ, Gasson P, Morales-Can J, Jiménez-Barrios JB, Chase MW (2010) Petenaeaceae, a new angiosperm family in Huerteales with a distant relationship to Gerrardina (Gerrardinaceae). Bot J Linn Soc 164:16–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Corner EJH (1946) Centrifugal stamens. J Arnold Arbor 27:423–437Google Scholar
  27. Crane PR, Pedersen KR, Friis EM, Drinnan AN (1993) Early Cretaceous (early to middle Albian) platanoid inflorescences associated with Sapindopsis leaves from the Potomac Group of eastern North America. Syst Bot 91:1666–1682Google Scholar
  28. Crane PR, Herendeen PS, Friis EM (2004) Fossils and plant phylogeny. Am J Bot 91:1683–1699PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Cronquist A (1957) Outline of a new system of families and orders of dicotyledons. Bull Jard Bot État Bruxelles 27:13–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Cronquist A (1981) An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Cuénoud P, Savolainen V, Chatrou LW, Powell M, Grayer RJ, Chase MW (2002) Molecular phylogenetics of Caryophyllales based on nuclear 18S rDNA and plastid rbcL, atpB, and matK DNA sequences. Am J Bot 89:132–144PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Davis CC, Anderson WR (2010) A complete generic phylogeny of Malpighiaceae inferred from nucleotide sequence data and morphology. Am J Bot 97:2031–2048PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Davis CC, Endress PK, Baum DA (2008) The evolution of floral gigantism. Curr Opin Plant Biol 11:49–57PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Dickison WC (1972) Observations on the floral morphology of some species of Saurauia, Actinidia, and Clematoclethra. J Elisha Mitchell Sci Soc 88:43–54Google Scholar
  35. Doweld A (2001) Prosyllabus Tracheophytorum. Tentamen systematis plantarum vascularium (Tracheophyta). GEOS, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  36. Doweld A, Reveal JL (2008) New suprageneric names for vascular plants. Phytologia 90:416–417Google Scholar
  37. Doyle JA, Endress PK (2000) Morphological phylogenetic analysis of basal angiosperms: comparison and combination with molecular data. Int J Plant Sci 161:S121–S153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Doyle JA, Endress PK (2010) Integrating Early Cretaceous fossils into the phylogeny of living angiosperms: Magnoliidae and eudicots. J Syst Evol 48:1–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Doyle JA, Endress PK (2011) Tracing the evolutionary diversification of the flower in basal angiosperms. In: Wanntorp L, Ronse De Craene LP (eds) Flowers on the tree of life. Systematics Association Special Volume Series, vol 80. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 88–119Google Scholar
  40. Eckardt T (1976) Classical morphological features of of centrospermous families. Plant Syst Evol 126:5–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Eckert G (1966) Entwicklungsgeschichtliche und blütenanatomische Untersuchungen zum Problem der Obdiplostemonie. Bot Jahrb Syst 85:523–604Google Scholar
  42. Endress PK (1967) Systematische Studie über die verwandtschaftlichen Beziehungen zwischen den Hamamelidaceen und Betulaceen. Bot Jahrb Syst 87:431–525Google Scholar
  43. Endress PK (1977) Evolutionary trends in the Hamamelidales–Fagales group. Plant Syst Evol Suppl 1:321–347Google Scholar
  44. Endress PK (1982) Syncarpy and alternative modes of escaping disadvantages of apocarpy in primitive angiosperms. Taxon 31:48–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Endress PK (1986) Floral structure, systematics and phylogeny in Trochodendrales. Ann Mo Bot Gard 73:297–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Endress PK (1987) Floral phyllotaxis and floral evolution. Bot Jahrb Syst 108:417–438Google Scholar
  47. Endress PK (1989a) A suprageneric taxonomic classification of the Hamamelidaceae. Taxon 38:371–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Endress PK (1989b) Aspects of evolutionary differentiation of the Hamamelidaceae and the Lower Hamamelididae. Plant Syst Evol 162:193–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Endress PK (1989c) Chaotic floral phyllotaxis and reduced perianth in Achlys (Berberidaceae). Bot Acta 102:159–163Google Scholar
  50. Endress PK (1994a) Diversity and evolutionary biology of tropical flowers. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  51. Endress PK (1994b) Shapes, sizes and evolutionary trends in stamens of Magnoliidae. Bot Jahrb Syst 115:429–460Google Scholar
  52. Endress PK (1997a) Evolutionary biology of flowers: prospects for the next century. In: Iwatsuki K, Raven PH (eds) Evolution and diversification of land plants. Springer, Tokyo, pp 99–119Google Scholar
  53. Endress PK (1997b) Relationships between floral organization, architecture and pollination mode in Dillenia (Dilleniaceae). Plant Syst Evol 206:99–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Endress PK (2002) Morphology and angiosperm systematics in the molecular era. Bot Rev 68:545–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Endress PK (2003) What should a “complete” morphological phylogenetic analysis entail? In: Stuessy TF, Hörandl E, Mayer V (eds) Deep morphology: toward a renaissance of morphology in plant systematics. Regnum Vegetabile, vol. 141. Gantner, Ruggell, pp 131–164Google Scholar
  56. Endress PK (2005) Links between embryology and evolutionary floral morphology. Curr Sci 89:749–754Google Scholar
  57. Endress PK (2006) Angiosperm floral evolution: Morphological developmental framework. Adv Bot Res 44:1–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Endress PK (2008) The whole and the parts: relationships between floral architecture and floral organ shape, and their repercussions on the interpretation of fragmentary floral fossils. Ann Mo Bot Gard 95:101–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Endress PK (2010a) Flower structure and trends of evolution in eudicots and their major subclades. Ann Mo Bot Gard 97:541–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Endress PK (2010b) Synorganisation without organ fusion in the flowers of Geranium robertianum (Geraniaceae) and its not so trivial obdiplostemony. Ann Bot 106:687–695PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Endress PK (2011a) Angiosperm ovules: diversity, development, evolution. Ann Bot 107:1465–1489PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Endress PK (2011b) Changing views of flower evolution and new questions. In: Wanntorp L, Ronse De Craene LP (eds) Flowers on the tree of life. Systematics Association Special Volume Series, vol 80. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 120–141Google Scholar
  63. Endress PK (2011c) Evolutionary diversification of the flowers in angiosperms. Am J Bot 98:370–396PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Endress PK, Doyle JA (2007) Floral phyllotaxis in basal angiosperms—development and evolution. Curr Opin Plant Biol 10:52–57PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Endress PK, Doyle JA (2009) Reconstructing the ancestral flower and its initial specializations. Am J Bot 96:22–66PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Endress PK, Friis EM (1991) Archamamelis, hamamelidalean flowers from the Upper Cretaceous of Sweden. Plant Syst Evol 175:101–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Endress PK, Friis EM (2006) Rosids—reproductive structures, fossil and extant, and their bearing on deep relationships. Introduction. Plant Syst Evol 260:83–85Google Scholar
  68. Endress PK, Hufford LD (1989) The diversity of stamen structures and dehiscence patterns among Magnoliidae. Bot J Linn Soc 100:45–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Endress PK, Igersheim A (1999) Gynoecium diversity and systematics of the basal eudicots. Bot J Linn Soc 130:305–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Endress PK, Igersheim A (2000) Gynoecium structure and evolution in basal angiosperms. Int J Plant Sci 161:S211–S223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Endress PK, Matthews ML (2006a) Elaborate petals and staminodes in eudicots: structure, function, evolution. Org Divers Evol 6:257–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Endress PK, Matthews ML (2006b) First steps towards a floral structural characterization of the major rosid subclades. Plant Syst Evol 260:223–251Google Scholar
  73. Endress PK, Stumpf S (1991) The diversity of stamen structures in lower Rosidae (Rosales, Fabales, Proteales, Sapindales). Bot J Linn Soc 107:217–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Endress PK, Jenny M, Fallen ME (1983) Convergent elaboration of apocarpous gynoecia in higher advanced dicotyledons (Sapindales, Malvales, Gentianales). Nord J Bot 3:292–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Endress PK, Baas P, Gregory M (2000) Systematic morphology and anatomy: 50 years of progress. Taxon 49:401–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Engler A (1925) Parietales. In: Engler A, Prantl K (eds) Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien (edn 2) 21. Engelmann, Leipzig, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  77. Engler A (1930) Saxifragaceae. In: Engler A, Prantl K (eds) Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien (edn 2) 18 a. Engelmann, Leipzig, pp 74–226Google Scholar
  78. Engler A (1931) Rutaceae. In: Engler A, Prantl K (eds) Die natürlichen Planzenfamilien (edn 2) 19 a. Engelmann, Leipzig, pp 187–359Google Scholar
  79. Engler A, Krause K (1931) Dichapetalaceae. In: Engler A, Prantl K (eds) Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien (edn 2) 19c. Engelmann, Leipzig, pp 1–11Google Scholar
  80. Erbar C, Leins P (1996) Distribution of the character states “early” and “late sympetaly” within the “Sympetalae Tetracyclicae” and presumably related groups. Bot Acta 109:427–440Google Scholar
  81. Erbar C, Leins P (2011) Synopsis of some important, non-DNA character states in the asterids with special reference to sympetaly. Plant Divers Evol 129:93–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Filipowicz N, Renner SS (2010) The worldwide holoparasitic Apodanthaceae confidently placed in the Cucurbitales by nuclear and mitochondrial gene trees. BMC Evol Biol 10:219PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  83. Friis EM, Crane PR, Pedersen KR (1988) Reproductive structures of Cretaceous Platanaceae. Biol Skr Danske Vidensk Selsk 31:1–55Google Scholar
  84. Friis EM, Pedersen KR, Schönenberger J (2006) Normapolles plants: a prominent component of the Cretaceous rosid diversification. Plant Syst Evol 260:107–140Google Scholar
  85. Friis EM, Crane PR, Pedersen KR (2011) Early flowers and angiosperm evolution. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Gibbs LS (1917) Dutch N.W. New Guinea: A contribution to the phytogeography and flora of the Arfak Mountains & c. Taylor & Frances, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. González F, Rudall PJ (2010) Flower and fruit characters in the early-divergent lamiid family Metteniusaceae, with particular reference to the evolution of pseudomonomery. Am J Bot 97:191–206PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. González F, Betancur J, Maurin O, Freudenstein JV, Chase MW (2007) Metteniusaceae, an early-diverging family in the lamiid clade. Taxon 56:795–800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Hallier H (1896) Betrachtungen über die Verwandtschaftsbeziehungen der Ampelideen und anderer Pflanzenfamilien. Natuurk Tijdschr Ned-Indië III 56:300–331Google Scholar
  90. Hamann U (1975) Neue Untersuchungen zur Embryologie und Systematik der Centrolepidaceae. Bot Jahrb Syst 96:154–191Google Scholar
  91. Hamann U (1976) Hydatellaceae—a new family of Monocotyledoneae. N Z J Bot 14:193–196Google Scholar
  92. Harms H (1940) Meliaceae. In: Engler A, Prantl K (eds) Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien (edn 2) 19 bI. Engelmann, Leipzig, pp 1–172Google Scholar
  93. Hartl D (1962) Die morphologische Natur und die Verbreitung des Apikalseptums. Analyse einer bisher unbekannten Gestaltungsmöglichkeit des Gynoeceums. Beitr Biol Pfl 37:241–330Google Scholar
  94. Hayes V, Schneider EL, Carlquist S (2000) Floral development of Nelumbo nucifera (Nelumbonaceae). Int J Plant Sci 161:S183–S191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Hiepko P (1965) Das zentrifugale Androeceum der Paeoniaceae. Ber Deutsch Bot Ges 77:427–435Google Scholar
  96. Hoogland RD, Reveal JL (2005) Index nominum familiarum plantarum vascularium. Bot Rev 71:1–291Google Scholar
  97. Hufford L (1992) Rosidae and their relationships to other nonmagnoliid dicotyledons: a phylogenetic analysis using morphological and chemical data. Ann Mo Bot Gard 79:218–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Hufford L (1995) Patterns of ontogenetic evolution in perianth diversification of Besseya (Scrophulariaceae). Am J Bot 82:655–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Hufford LD (1990) Androecial development and the problem of monophyly of Loasaceae. Can J Bot 68:402–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Hufford LD, Endress PK (1989) The diversity of anther structures and dehiscence patterns among Hamamelididae. Bot J Linn Soc 99:301–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Hufford L, Moody ML, Soltis DE (2001) A phylogenetic analysis of Hydrangeaceae based on sequences of the plastid gene matK and their combination with rbcL and morphological data. Int J Plant Sci 162:835–846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Iltis HH (1999) Setchellanthaceae (Capparales), a new family for a relictual, glucosinolate-producing endemic of the Mexican desert. Taxon 48:257–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Jäger-Zürn I (1966) Infloreszenz- und blütenmorphologische, sowie embryologische Untersuchungen an Myrothamnus Welw. Beitr Biol Pfl 42:241–271Google Scholar
  104. Janka H, von Balthazar M, Alverson WS, Baum DA, Semir J, Bayer C (2008) Structure, development and evolution of the androecium in Adansonieae (core Bombacoideae, Malvaceae s.l.). Plant Syst Evol 275:69–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Jérémie J (1997) Sphenostemonaceae. In: Morat P (ed) Flore de la Nouvelle Calédonie 21. Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris, pp 3–21Google Scholar
  106. Jérémie J (2008) Paracryphiaceae. Species Plantarum. Flora of the world, vol 13. Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, Geneva, pp 1–7Google Scholar
  107. Jian S, Soltis PS, Gitzendanner MA, Moore MJ, Li R, Hendry TA, Qiu Y-L, Dhringa A, Bell CD, Soltis DE (2008) Resolving an ancient, rapid radiation in Saxifragales. Syst Biol 57:38–57PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Karehed J (2001) Multiple origin of the tropical forest tree family Icacinaceae. Am J Bot 88:2259–2274PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Karol KG, Rodman JE, Conti E, Sytsma KJ (1999) Nucleotide sequence of rbcL and phylogenetic relationships of Setchellanthus caeruleus (Setchellanthaceae). Taxon 48:303–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Karrer AB (1991) Blütenentwicklung und systematische Stellung der Papaveraceae und Capparaceae. Doctoral dissertation, University of Zurich. ADAG, ZurichGoogle Scholar
  111. Kubitzki K, Kallunki JA, Duretto M, Wilson PG (2011) Rutaceae. In: Kubitzki K (ed) The families and genera of vascular plants, vol 10. Springer, Berlin, pp 276–356Google Scholar
  112. Leins P (1975) Die Beziehungen zwischen multistaminaten und einfachen Androeceen. Bot Jahrb Syst 96:231–237Google Scholar
  113. Leins P, Erbar C (2010) Flower and fruit. Morphology, ontogeny, phylogeny, function and ecology. Schweizerbart, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  114. Leins P, Metzenauer G (1979) Entwicklungsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen an Capparis-Blüten. Bot Jahrb Syst 100:542–554Google Scholar
  115. Leins P, Schwitalla S (1985) Studien an Cactaceen-Blüten I. Einige Bemerkungen zur Blütenentwicklung von Pereskia. Beitr Biol Pflanzen 60:313–323Google Scholar
  116. Link DA (1992) The floral nectaries of the Geraniales and their systematic implications VI. Ixonanthaceae Exell & Mendonça. Bot Jahrb Syst 114:81–90Google Scholar
  117. Losos JB (2011) Seeing the forest for the trees: the limitations of phylogenies in comparative biology. Am Nat 177:709–727PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Mabberley DJ (2011) Meliaceae. In: Kubitzki K (ed) The families and genera of vascular plants, vol 10. Springer, Berlin, pp 185–211Google Scholar
  119. Magallón S (2007) From fossils to molecules: phylogeny and the core eudicot floral groundplan in Hamamelidoideae (Hamamelidaceae, Saxifragales). Syst Bot 32:317–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Magallón S, Herendeen PS, Crane PR (1997) Quadriplatanus georgianus gen. et sp. nov.: staminate and pistillate platanaceous flowers from the Late Cretaceous (Coniacian-Santonian of Georgia, USA). Int J Plant Sci 158:373–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Magallón S, Herendeen PS, Crane PR (2001) Androdecidua endressii gen. et sp. nov., from the Late Cretaceous of Georgia (United States): further floral diversity in Hamamelidoideae (Hamamelidaceae). Int J Plant Sci 162:963–983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Magallón-Puebla S, Herendeen PS, Endress PK (1996) Allonia decandra: floral remains of the tribe Hamamelideae (Hamamelidaceae) from Campanian strata of Southeastern U.S.A. Plant Syst Evol 202:177–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Malécot V, Nickrent DL (2008) Molecular phylogenetic relationships of Olacaceae and related Santalales. Syst Bot 33:97–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Manos PS, Steele KP (1997) Phylogenetic analysis of “higher” Hamamelididae based on plastid sequence data. Am J Bot 84:1407–1419PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Matthews ML, Endress PK (2002) Comparative floral structure and systematics in Oxalidales (Oxalidaceae, Connaraceae, Cephalotaceae, Brunelliaceae, Cunoniaceae, Elaeocarpaceae, Tremandraceae). Bot J Linn Soc 140:321–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Matthews ML, Endress PK (2004) Comparative floral structure and systematics in Cucurbitales (Corynocarpaceae, Coriariaceae, Datiscaceae, Tetramelaceae, Begoniaceae, Cucurbitaceae, Anisophyllaceae). Bot J Linn Soc 145:129–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Matthews ML, Endress PK (2005a) Comparative floral structure and systematics in Celastrales (Celastraceae, Parnassiaceae, Lepidobotryaceae). Bot J Linn Soc 149:129–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Matthews ML, Endress PK (2005b) Comparative floral structure and systematics in Crossosomatales (Crossosomataceae, Stachyuraceae, Staphyleaceae, Aphloiaceae, Geissolomataceae, Ixerbaceae, Strasburgeriaceae). Bot J Linn Soc 147:1–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Matthews ML, Endress PK (2006) Floral structure and systematics in four orders of rosids, including a broad survey of floral mucilage cells. Plant Syst Evol 260:199–221Google Scholar
  130. Matthews ML, Endress PK (2008) Comparative floral structure and systematics in Chrysobalanaceae s.l. (Chrysobalanaceae, Dichapetalaceae, Euphroniaceae, Trigoniaceae; Malpighiales). Bot J Linn Soc 157:249–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Matthews ML, Endress PK (2011) Comparative floral structure and systematics in Rhizophoraceae, Erythroxylaceae, and the potentially related Ctenolophonaceae, Linaceae, Irvingiaceae, and Caryocaraceae (Malpighiales). Bot J Linn Soc 166:331–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Matthews ML, Endress PK, Schönenberger J, Friis EM (2001) A comparison of floral structures of Anisophylleaceae and Cunoniaceae and the problem of their systematic position. Ann Bot 88:439–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Mayr B (1969) Ontogenetische Studien an Myrtales-Blüten. Bot Jahrb Syst 89:210–271Google Scholar
  134. Merino Suter D, Forster PI, Endress PK (2006) Female flowers and systematic position of Picrodendraceae (Euphorbiaceae s.l., Malpighiales). Plant Syst Evol 261:187–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Merxmüller H, Leins P (1967) Die Verwandtschaftsbeziehungen der Kreuzblütler und Mohngewächse. Bot Jahrb Syst 86:113–129Google Scholar
  136. Nandi OI (1998a) Floral development and systematics of Cistaceae. Plant Syst Evol 212:107–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Nandi OI (1998b) Ovule and seed anatomy of Cistaceae and related Malvanae. Plant Syst Evol 209:239–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Nandi OI, Chase MW, Endress PK (1998) A combined cladistic analysis of angiosperms using rbcL and nonmolecular data sets. Ann Mo Bot Gard 85:137–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Nickrent D, Malécot V, Vidal-Russell R, Der JP (2010) A revised classification of Santalales. Taxon 59:538–558Google Scholar
  140. Nuraliev MS, Oskolski AA, Sokoloff DD, Remizowa MV (2010) Flowers of Araliaceae: structural diversity, developmental and evolutionary aspects. Plant Div Evol 128:247–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Nyffeler R, Eggli U (2010) Disintegrating Portulacaceae: a new familial classification of the suborder Portulacineae (Caryophyllales) based on molecular and morphological data. Taxon 59:227–240Google Scholar
  142. Oh SH, Potter D (2006) Description and phylogenetic position of a new angiosperm family, Guamatelaceae, inferred from chloroplast rbcL, atpB, and matK sequences. Syst Bot 31:730–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. Pax F, Hoffmann K (1931) Euphorbiaceae. In: Engler A, Prantl K (eds) Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien (edn 2) 19c. Engelmann, Leipzig, pp 11–240Google Scholar
  144. Prenner G, Box MS, Cunniff J, Rudall PJ (2008) The branching stamens of Ricinus and the homologies of the angiosperm stamen fascicle. Int J Plant Sci 169:735–744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Qiu Y-L, Chase MW, Hoot SB, Conti E, Crane PR, Sytsma KJ, Parks CR (1998) Phylogenetics of the Hamamelidae and their allies: parsimony analyses of nucleotide sequences of the plastid gene rbcL. Int J Plant Sci 159:891–905Google Scholar
  146. Qiu Y-L, Li L, Wang B, Xue J-Y, Hendry TA, Li R-Q, Brown JW, Liu Y, Geordan T, Chen Z-D (2010) Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from sequences of four mitochondrial genes. J Syst Evol 48:391–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. Remizowa MV, Sokoloff DD, Rudall PJ (2010) Evolutionary history of the monocot flower. Ann Mo Bot Gard 97:617–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. Ren Y, Li H-F, Zhao L, Endress PK (2007) Floral morphogenesis in Euptelea (Eupteleaceae, Ranunculales). Ann Bot 100:185–193PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. Ren Y, Chang H-L, Endress PK (2010) Floral development in Anemoneae (Ranunculaceae). Bot J Linn Soc 162:77–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. Reuter K (1926) Die Phylogenie der Parietales. Bot Arch 16:118–217Google Scholar
  151. Reveal JL (1993) New ordinal names for extant vascular plants. Phytologia 74:173–177Google Scholar
  152. Reveal JL (2011) Summary of recent systems of angiosperm classification. Kew Bull 66:1–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. Reveal JL, Chase MW (2011) APG III: bibliographical information and synonymy of Magnoliidae. Phytotaxa 19:71–134Google Scholar
  154. Ritterbusch A (1991) Morphologisches Beschreibungsmodell tubiflorer Kronen, ein Beitrag zur Terminologie und Morphologie der Asteriden-Blüte. Bot Jahrb Syst 112:329–345Google Scholar
  155. Rodman J, Karol KG, Price RA, Sytsma KJ (1996) Molecules, morphology, and Dahlgren’s expanded order Capparales. Syst Bot 21:289–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  156. Rohweder O (1963) Anatomische und histogenetische Untersuchungen an Laubsprossen und Blüten der Commelinaceen. Bot Jahrb Syst 82:1–99Google Scholar
  157. Ronse Decraene LP (1989) Floral development of Cochlospermum tinctorium and Bixa orellana with special emphasis on the androecium. Am J Bot 76:1344–1359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  158. Ronse De Craene LP (2008) Homology and evolution of petals in the core eudicots. Syst Bot 33:301–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. Ronse De Craene LP (2010) Floral diagrams. An aid to understanding flower morphology and evolution. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  160. Ronse De Craene LP, Haston E (2006) The systematic relationships of glucosinolate-producing plants and related families: a cladistic investigation based on morphological and molecular characters. Bot J Linn Soc 151:453–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  161. Ronse Decraene LP, Smets EF (1991) The impact of receptacular growth on polyandry in the Myrtales. Bot J Linn Soc 105:257–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  162. Ronse Decraene LP, Smets EF (1992) Complex polyandry in the Magnoliatae, definition, distribution and systematic value. Nord J Bot 12:621–649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  163. Ronse Decraene LP, Smets EF (1993) The distribution and systematic relevance of the androecial character polymery. Bot J Linn Soc 113:285–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  164. Ronse Decraene LP, Smets EF (1995) The distribution and systematic relevance of the androecial character oligomery. Bot J Linn Soc 118:193–247Google Scholar
  165. Ronse Decraene LP, Smets EF (1999a) Similarities in floral ontogeny and anatomy between the genera Francoa (Francoaceae) and Greyia (Greyiaceae). Int J Plant Sci 160:377–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  166. Ronse Decraene LP, Smets EF (1999b) The floral development and anatomy of Carica papaya (Caricaceae). Can J Bot 77:582–598Google Scholar
  167. Ronse De Craene LP, Wanntorp L (2006) Evolution of floral characters in Gunnera (Gunneraceae). Syst Bot 31:671–688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  168. Ronse Decraene LP, Linder HP, Smets EF (2000) The questionable relationship of Montinia (Montiniaceae): evidence from a floral ontogenetic and anatomical study. Am J Bot 87:1408–1424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  169. Ronse De Craene LP, Linder HP, Dlamini T, Smets EF (2001) Evolution and development of floral diversity of Melianthaceae, an enigmatic Southern African family. Int J Plant Sci 162:59–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  170. Ross R (1982) Initiation of stamens, carpels, and receptacle in the Cactaceae. Am J Bot 69:369–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  171. Rudall PJ (2010) All in a spin: centrifugal organ formation and floral patterning. Curr Opin Plant Biol 13:108–114PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  172. Rudall PJ, Bateman RM (2006) Morphological phylogenetic analysis of Pandanales: testing contrasting hypotheses of floral evolution. Syst Bot 31:223–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  173. Rudall PJ, Sokoloff DD, Remizowa MV, Conran JG, Davis JI, Macfarlane TD, Stevenson DW (2007) Morphology of Hydatellaceae, an anomalous aquatic family recently recognized as a early-divergent angiosperm lineage. Am J Bot 94:1073–1092PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  174. Ruhfel BR, Bittrich V, Bove CP, Gustafsson MHG, Philbrick CT, Rutishauser R, Xi Z, Davis CC (2011) Phylogeny of the clusioid clade (Malpighiales): evidence from the plastid and mitochondrial genomes. Am J Bot 98:306–325PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  175. Rutishauser R, Wanntorp L, Pfeifer E (2004) Gunnera herteri—developmental morphology of a dwarf from Uruguay and S Brazil (Gunneraceae). Plant Syst Evol 248:219–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  176. Saarela JM, Rai HS, Doyle JA, Endress PK, Mathews S, Marchant AD, Briggs BG, Graham SW (2007) Hydatellaceae identified as a new branch near the base of the angiosperm phylogenetic tree. Nature 446:312–315PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  177. Sauer H (1933) Blüte und Frucht der Oxalidaceen, Linaceen, Geraniaceen, Tropaeolaceen und Balsaminaceen. Vergleichend-entwicklungsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen. Planta 19:417–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  178. Savolainen V, Fay MF, Albach DC, Backlund A, van der Bank M, Cameron KM, Johnson SA, Lledó MD, Pintaud J-C, Powell M, Sheahan MC, Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Weston P, Whitten WM, Wurdack KJ, Chase MW (2000) Phylogeny of the eudicots: a nearly complete familial analysis based on rbcL gene sequences. Kew Bull 55:257–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  179. Schaefer H, Renner SS (2011) Phylogenetic relationships in the order Cucurbitales and a new classification of the gourd family (Cucurbitaceae). Taxon 60:122–138Google Scholar
  180. Schäferhoff B, Müller KF, Borsch T (2010) Caryophyllales phylogenetics: disentangling Phytolaccaceae and Molluginaceae and description of Microteaceae as a new isolated family. Willdenowia 39:209–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  181. Schlechter R (1906) Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Flora von Neu-Kaledonien. Bot Jahrb Syst 39:1–274Google Scholar
  182. Schöffel K (1932) Untersuchungen über den Blütenbau der Ranunculaceen. Planta 17:315–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  183. Schönenberger J (2009) Comparative floral structure and systematics of Fouquieriaceae and Polemoniaceae (Ericales). Int J Plant Sci 170:1132–1167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  184. Schönenberger J, Conti E (2003) Molecular phylogeny and floral evolution in Penaeaceae, Oliniaceae, Rhynchocalycaceae, and Alzateaceae (Myrtales). Am J Bot 90:292–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  185. Schönenberger J, von Balthazar M (2006) Reproductive structures and phylogenetic framework of the rosids—progress and prospects. Plant Syst Evol 260:87–106Google Scholar
  186. Schönenberger J, Grenhagen (2005) Early floral development and androecium organization in Fouquieriaceae (Ericales). Plant Syst Evol 254:233-249Google Scholar
  187. Schönenberger J, Anderberg AA, Sytsma KJ (2005) Molecular phylogenetics and patterns of floral evolution in the Ericales. Int J Plant Sci 166:265–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  188. Schönenberger J, von Balthazar M, Sytsma KJ (2010) Diversity and evolution of floral structure among early diverging lineages in the Ericales. Phil Trans Roy Soc Lond B 365:437–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  189. Scotland RW (2011) What is parallelism? Evol Dev 13:214–227PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  190. Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Chase MW, Mort ME, Albach DC, Zanis M, Savolainen V, Hahn WH, Hoot SB, Fay MF, Axtell M, Swensen SM, Prince LM, Kress WJ, Nixon KC, Farris JS (2000) Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S rDNA, rbcL, and atpB sequences. Bot J Linn Soc 133:381–461Google Scholar
  191. Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Endress PK, Chase MW (2005) Phylogeny and evolution of angiosperms. Sinauer, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  192. Soltis DE, Smith SA, Cellinese N, Wurdack KJ, Tank DC, Brockington SF, Refulio-Rodriguez NF, Walker JB, Moore MJ, Carlsward BS, Bell CD, Latvis M, Crawley S, Black C, Diouf D, Xi Z, Rushworth CA, Gitzendanner MA, Sytsma KJ, Qiu Y-L, Hilu KW, Davis CC, Sanderson MJ, Beaman RS, Olmstead RG, Judd WS, Donoghue MJ, Soltis PS (2011) Angiosperm phylogeny: 17 genes, 640 taxa. Am J Bot 98:704–730PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  193. Sosa V, Chase MW (2003) Phylogenetics of Crossosomataceae based on rbcL sequence data. Syst Bot 28:96–105Google Scholar
  194. Staedler YM, Endress PK (2009) Diversity and lability of floral phyllotaxis in the pluricarpellate families of core Laurales (Gomortegaceae, Atherospermataceae, Siparunaceae, Monimiaceae). Int J Plant Sci 170:522–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  195. Stevens PF (2001) Angiosperm phylogeny website, version 9, June 2008.
  196. Stevens PF (2007) Clusiaceae-Guttiferae. In: Kubitzki K (ed) The families and genera of vascular plants, vol 9. Springer, Berlin, pp 48–66Google Scholar
  197. Stevens PF, Luteyn J, Oliver EGH, Bell TL, Brown EA, Crowden RK, George AS, Jordan GJ, Ladd P, Lemson K, McLean CB, Menadue Y, Pate JS, Stace HM, Weiller CM (2004) Ericaceae. In: Kubitzki K (ed) The families and genera of vascular plants, vol 6. Springer, Berlin, pp 145–194Google Scholar
  198. ’t Hart H, van der Ham RDHJ, Stevens JF, Elema ET, van der Klis H, Gadella TWJ (1999) Biosystematic, molecular and phytochemical evidence for the multiple origin of sympetaly in Eurasian Sedoideae (Crassulaceae). Biochem Syst Ecol 27:407–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  199. Takhtajan A (1959) Die Evolution der Angiospermen. Fischer, JenaGoogle Scholar
  200. Takhtajan A (1964) The taxa of the higher plants above the rank of order. Taxon 13:160–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  201. Takhtajan A (1987) Systema Magnoliophytorum. Nauka, LeningradGoogle Scholar
  202. Takhtajan A (1997) Diversity and classification of flowering plants. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  203. Tank DC, Donoghue MJ (2010) Phylogeny and phylogenetic nomenclature of the Campanulidae based on an expanded sample of genes and taxa. Syst Bot 35:425–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  204. Tank DC, Beardsley PM, Kelchner SA, Olmstead RG (2006) Review of the systematics of Scrophulariaceae s.l. and their current disposition. Aust Syst Bot 19:289–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  205. Thorne RF (1983) Proposed new alignments in the angiosperms. Nord J Bot 3:85–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  206. Thorne RF (1992) An updated phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants. Aliso 13:365–389Google Scholar
  207. Tomlinson PB (1980) The biology of trees native to tropical Florida. Harvard University Printing Office, AllstonGoogle Scholar
  208. Tsou C-H (1998) Early floral development of Camellioideae (Theaceae). Am J Bot 85:1531–1547PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  209. Tsou C-H, Mori SA (2007) Floral organogenesis and floral evolution of the Lecythidoideae (Lecythidaceae). Am J Bot 94:716–736PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  210. Upchurch GR, Crane PR, Drinnan AN (1994) The megaflora from the Quantico locality (upper Albian), Lower Cretaceous Potomac Group of Virginia. Virg Mus Nat Hist Mem 4:1–57Google Scholar
  211. van Heel WA (1966) Morphology of the androecium in Malvales. Blumea 13:177–394Google Scholar
  212. von Balthazar M, Endress PK (2002a) Development of inflorescences and flowers in Buxaceae and the problem of perianth interpretation. Int J Plant Sci 163:847–876CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  213. von Balthazar M, Endress PK (2002b) Reproductive structures and systematics of Buxaceae. Bot J Linn Soc 140:193–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  214. von Balthazar M, Schönenberger J (2009) Floral structure and organization in Platanaceae. Int J Plant Sci 170:210–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  215. von Balthazar M, Endress PK, Qiu Y-L (2000) Molecular phylogenetics of Buxaceae based on nuclear ITS and plastid ndhF sequences. Int J Plant Sci 161:785–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  216. von Balthazar M, Schatz GE, Endress PK (2003) Female flowers and inflorescences of Didymelaceae. Plant Syst Evol 237:199–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  217. von Balthazar M, Schönenberger J, Alverson WS, Bayer C, Baum DA (2006) Structure and evolution of the androecium in the Malvatheca clade (Malvaceae s.l.) and implications for Malvaceae and Malvales. Plant Syst Evol 260:171–197Google Scholar
  218. Wagenitz G (1997) The impact of molecular methods on the systematics of angiosperms. Bot Acta 110:274–281Google Scholar
  219. Wake DB, Wake MH, Specht CD (2011) Homoplasy: from detecting pattern to determining process and mechanism of evolution. Science 331:1032–1035PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  220. Walker JW, Doyle JA (1975) The bases of angiosperm phylogeny: palynology. Ann Mo Bot Gard 62:664–723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  221. Wang H, Moore MJ, Soltis PS, Bell CD, Brockington SF, Alexandre R, Davis CC, Latvis M, Manchester SR, Soltis DE (2009) Rosid radiation and the rapid rise of angiosperm-dominated forests. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:3853–3858PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  222. Wang X-F, Armbruster WS, Huang S-Q (2012) Extra-gynoecial pollen-tube growth in apocarpous angiosperms is phylogenetically widespread and probably adaptive. New Phytol 193:253–260Google Scholar
  223. Wanntorp L, Ronse De Craene LP (2009) Perianth evolution in the sandalwood order Santalales. Am J Bot 96:1361–1371PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  224. Wassmer A (1955) Vergleichend-morphologische Untersuchungen an den Blüten der Crassulaceen. Doctoral dissertation, University of Zurich. Keller, WinterthurGoogle Scholar
  225. Wolfe JA, Doyle JA, Page VM (1975) The bases of angiosperm phylogeny: paleobotany. Ann Mo Bot Gard 62:801–824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  226. Worberg A, Alford MH, Quandt D, Borsch T (2009) Huerteales sister to Brassicales plus Malvales, and newly circumscribed to include Dipentodon, Gerrardina, Huertea, Perrottetia, and Tapiscia. Taxon 58:468–478Google Scholar
  227. Wu H-C, Su H-J, Hu J-M (2007) The identification of A-, B-, C-, and E-class MADS-box genes and implications for perianth evolution in the basal eudicot Trochodendron aralioides (Trochodendraceae). Int J Plant Sci 168:775–799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  228. Wurdack KJ, Davis CC (2009) Malpighiales phylogenetics: gaining ground on one of the most recalcitrant clades in the angiosperm tree of life. Am J Bot 96:1551–1570PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  229. Zhang L-B, Simmons MP (2006) Phylogeny and delimitation of the Celastrales inferred from nuclear and plastid genes. Syst Bot 31:122–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  230. Zhang L-B, Simmons MP, Kocyan A, Renner SS (2006) Phylogeny of the Cucurbitales based on DNA sequences of nine loci from three genomes: implications for morphological and sexual system evolution. Mol Phylogenet Evol 39:305–322PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Systematic BotanyUniversity of ZurichZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations