Plant Systematics and Evolution

, Volume 289, Issue 1–2, pp 13–33 | Cite as

Leaf anatomy as a contribution to the taxonomy of Salacioideae N.Hallé ex Thorne & Reveal (Celastraceae)

  • Sandra Maria Alvarenga GomesEmail author
  • Julio Antonio Lombardi
Original Article


The current classification systems recognize Salacioideae as a monophyletic group within Celastraceae. Nonetheless, some divergences exist for genera: in some cases, most species of the subfamily have been included in only two genera; in others, these genera have been subdivided. This study characterizes the leaf anatomy of 31 species of the subfamily Salacioideae as a contribution to identifying them through features that may also help distinguish among genera. Cross-sections of the median region of the leaf blade and of the petiole and dissociated and macerated epidermis were analyzed. Taxonomically relevant anatomical characters include the type of crystals in the parenchymatous tissue (monocrystals in Cheiloclinium and druses in other genera); the presence of laticifers in Cheiloclinium and Tontelea only; the variable form of the petiole vascular system among studied species; the type of stomata (cyclocytic with two concentric circles of subsidiary cells in P. dulcis; anomocytic in T. attenuata, T. fluminensis, and T. leptophylla; laterocytic in C. anomalum and C. hippocrateoides; and ciclocytic in the other species); the sinuosity of the anticlinal walls of the epidermal cells (sinuous in Cheiloclinium and Peritassa, except P. laevigata, and in S. arborea, S. insignis, S. mosenii, S. nemerosa, and S. opacifolia, and straight in all other studied species); the presence of crystalliferous idioblasts in the epidermis of P. dulcis, P. flaviflora, and P. mexiae; and the presence, form, and disposition of sclereids in the leaf blade, which is a highly variable character among the studied species.


Celastraceae Salacioideae Leaf anatomy Taxonomy 



We thanks CNPq-Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, for Sandra M. A. Gomes Doctor Fellowship, and Julio A. Lombardi for the Research Fellowship grants (nº 523026/96-0, 300220/2003-0, and 306395/2006-1). We would also like to thank the reviewers Louis Ronse De Craene and Mark P. Simmons, who critically reexamined his manuscript.


  1. Alquini Y, Bona C, Boeger MRT, Costa CG, Barros CF (2003) Epiderme. In: Appezzato-da-Glória B, Carmello-Guerreiro SM (eds) Anatomia vegetal. Editora UFV, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, pp 87–107Google Scholar
  2. Balan Menon PK (1964) Perupok wood. Revision of nomenclature and classification. Malayan For 27:18–21Google Scholar
  3. Barthlott W (1981) Epidermal and seed surface characters of plants: systematic applicability and some evolutionary aspects. Nord J Bot 1:345–355. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-1051.1981.tb00704.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Coughenour JM, Simmons MP, Lombardi JA, Cappa JJ (2010) Phylogeny of Celastraceae subfamily Salacioideae and tribe Lophopetaleae inferred from morphological characters and nuclear and plastid genes. Syst Bot 35(2):358–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Den Hartog RM, Tholen V, Bass P (1978) Epidermal characters of the Celastraceae sensu lato. Acta Bot Neerl 27:355–388Google Scholar
  6. Esau K (1977) Anatomy of seed plants, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Fahn A (1990) Plant anatomy, 4th edn. Pergamon Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Farrell BD, Dussourd DE, Mitter C (1991) Escalation of plant defense: do latex and resin canals spur plant diversification? Am Nat 138(4):881–900. doi: 10.1086/285258 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fernandez MGV, Morales JB, Angeles G (1998) Anatomical studies on Hippocratea excelsa (Hippocrateaceae). Acta Bot Mex 43:7–21Google Scholar
  10. Foster A (1949) Pratical plant anatomy. Van Nostrand, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Franceschinelli EV, Yamamoto K (1993) Taxonomic use of leaf anatomical caracters in the genus Simarouba Aublet (Simaroubaceae). Flora 188:117–124Google Scholar
  12. Gomes SMA, Silva EAM, Lombardi JA, Azevedo AA, Vale FHA (2005) Anatomia foliar como subsídio à taxonomia de Hippocrateoideae (Celastraceae) no sudeste do Brazil. Acta Bot Bras 19(4):945–961. doi: 10.1590/S0102-33062005000400029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Görts-van Rijn ARA, Mennega AMW (1994) Hippocrateaceae. In: Görts-van Rijn ARA (ed) Flora of the Guianas 16. Koeltz Scientific, Königstein, pp 110–128Google Scholar
  14. Hall JB, Lock JM (1975) Use of vegetative characters in the identification of species of Salacia (Celastraceae). Boissiera 24:331–338Google Scholar
  15. Hou D (1963) Celastraceae. In: van Steenis CGGJ (ed) Flora Malesiana I, vol 6. Flora Malesiana Foundation, Leyden, pp 227–291Google Scholar
  16. Hou D (1969) Pólen of Sarawakodendron (Celastraceae) and some related genera with notes on techniques. Blumea 17:97–120Google Scholar
  17. Jain DK, Singh V (1974) Occurrence of giant stomata in Celastraceae and Convolvulaceae. Curr Sci 5:170Google Scholar
  18. Jansen WT, Baas P (1973) Comparative leaf anatomy of Kokoona and Lophopetalum (Celastraceae). Blumea 21:153–178Google Scholar
  19. Johansen DA (1940) Plant microtechnique. McGraw Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Kraus JE, Arduin M (1997) Manual Básico de Métodos em Morfologia Vegetal. Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de JaneiroGoogle Scholar
  21. Kurz S (1870) On some new or imperfectly known Indian plants. J Asiat Soc Beng 39(II):73Google Scholar
  22. Menezes NL, Silva DC, Pinna GFAM (2003) Folha. In: Appezzato-da-Glória B, Carmello-Guerreiro SM (eds) Anatomia vegetal. Editora UFV, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, pp 303–324Google Scholar
  23. Mennega AMW (1983) Notes on new world Hippocrateae (Fam. Celastraceae) II—a new species in Hemiangium. Acta Bot Neerl 32(5/6):427–430Google Scholar
  24. Mennega AMW (1997) Wood anatomy of the Hippocrateoideae (Celastraceae). IAWAJ 18(4):331–368Google Scholar
  25. Metcalfe CR (1967) Distribution of latex in the plant kingdom. Econ Bot 21:115–127Google Scholar
  26. Metcalfe CR, Chalk L (1979) Anatomy of the dicotyledons, vol 1: systematic anatomy of the leaf and stem. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Metcalfe CR, Chalk L (1983) Anatomy of the dicotyledons, vol 2: wood structure and conclusion of the general introduction. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Monje PV, Baran EJ (2002) Characterization of calcium oxalates generated as biominerals in cacti. Plant Physiol 128:707–713. doi: 10.1104/pp010630 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Nakata PA (2002) Calcium oxalate crystal morphology. Trends Plant Sci 7(7):324. doi: 10.1016/S1360-1385(02)02285-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Pant DD, Kidwai PF (1965) Epidermal structure and stomatal ontogeny in some Celastraceae. New Phytol 65:288–295. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1966.tb06364.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Peyritisch J (1878) Hippocrateaceae. In: Martius CFP, Eichler AG (eds) Flora Braziliensis, vol 11, no 1. Frid Fleischer, Lipsiae, pp 125–164Google Scholar
  32. Prychid CJ, Rudall PJ (1999) Calcium oxalate crystals in monocotyledons: a review of their structure and systematics. Ann Bot 84:725–739. doi: 10.1006/anbo.1999.0975 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rehfous L (1914) Les stomates des Célastracées. Soc Bot Genéve sér 2 VI(1):13–18Google Scholar
  34. Robson N (1965) New and little known species from the flora Zambesiaca area. XVI. Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on Celastraceae. Bol Soc Brot 2(39):5–55Google Scholar
  35. Salatino A, Montenegro G, Salatino MLF (1986) Microscopia eletrônica de varredura de superfícies foliares de espécies lenhosas do cerrado. Revta Brazil Bot 9:117–124Google Scholar
  36. Sass JE (1951) Botanical microtechnique, 2nd edn. Iowa State College Press, AmesGoogle Scholar
  37. Simmons MP, Hendin JP (1999) Relationships and morphological character change among genera of Celastraceae sensu latu (including Hippocrateaceae). Ann Missouri Bot Gard 86(3):723–757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Simmons MP, Clevinger CC, Savolainen V, Archer RH, Mathews S, Doyle JJ (2001a) Phylogeny of the Celastraceae inferred from phytochrome B gene sequence and morphology. Am J Bot 88:313–325CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Simmons MP, Savolainen V, Clevinger CC, Archer RH, Davis JI (2001b) Phylogeny of the Celastraceae inferred from 26S nuclear ribosomal DNA, phytochrome B, rbcl, atpB, and morphology. Mol Phylogenet Evol 19:353–366. doi: 10.1006/mpev.2001.0937 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Sitholey RV, Pandey YN (1970) Giant stomata. Ann Bot 35:641–642Google Scholar
  41. Smith AC (1940) The American species of Hippocrateaceae. Brittonia 3:341–555. doi: 10.2307/2804624 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Smith LB, Robinson HE (1971) Hippocrateáceas. In: Reitz R (ed) Flora ilustrada catarinense. Herbário Barbosa Rodrigues, Itajaí, pp 1–33Google Scholar
  43. Smith FH, Smith EC (1942) Anatomy of the inferior ovary of Darbia. Am J Bot 29:464–471. doi: 10.2307/2437312 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Solereder H (1908) Systematic anatomy of the dicotyledons: a handbook for laboratories of pure and applied botany. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  45. Stace CA (1965) Cuticular studies as an aid to plant taxonomy. Bull Br Mus (Nat Hist) Bot 4(1):1–78Google Scholar
  46. Vannucci AL, Rezende MH (2003) Anatomia vegetal: noções básicas. Edição do Autor, GoiâniaGoogle Scholar
  47. Vega AS, Castro MA, Anderson WR (2002) Occurence and phylogenetic significance of latex in the Malpighiaceae. Am J Bot 89(11):1725–1729. doi: 10.3732/ajb.89.11.1725 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zona S (2004) Raphides in palm embryos and their systematic distribution. Ann Bot 93:415–421. doi: 10.1093/aob/mch060 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sandra Maria Alvarenga Gomes
    • 1
    Email author
  • Julio Antonio Lombardi
    • 2
  1. 1.Departamento de Botânica, Setor de Ciências BiológicasUFPR-Universidade Federal do ParanáCuritibaBrazil
  2. 2.Instituto de BiociênciasUNESP-Universidade Estadual PaulistRio ClaroBrazil

Personalised recommendations