Plant Systematics and Evolution

, Volume 277, Issue 3–4, pp 173–185 | Cite as

Differential levels of genetic diversity and divergence among populations of an ancient Australian rainforest conifer, Araucaria cunninghamii

  • Matthew G. PyeEmail author
  • Murray J. Henwood
  • Paul A. Gadek
Original Article


Historical fragmentation and subsequent isolation has affected the levels of genetic diversity in many lineages of ancient plant taxa. This study investigated the effects of historical processes on Araucaria cunninghamii (Hoop Pine), Araucariaceae, using both RAPD and ISSR markers. While most populations maintain moderate levels of diversity, there is some evidence for reduced genetic variation. Most sampled populations are significantly differentiated from each other, thereby emphasizing the high degree of population structuring in A. cunninghamii. Increased divergence among the northern Queensland populations relative to southern Queensland populations suggests historical pressures have impacted differently on extant population distribution. More research is specifically required into the biology and population demographics of Australian Araucariaceae.


Araucaria cunninghamii Hoop Pine Araucariaceae RAPDs ISSRs Conifers Southern Hemisphere Population genetics 



We are extremely grateful for the assistance provided by the Environmental Protection Agency of Queensland, especially Bunya Mountains National Park staff, during M. Pye’s stay for sample collections. Michelle Waycott provided valuable assistance for the optimisation of the RAPD procedure and the formation of ISSR protocols. We thank Adella Edwards for the preparation of the figure of sampled Hoop Pine localities. We also thank Dr. Garth Nikles for insightful discussions regarding the history of Hoop Pine plantations in Australia. This research was supported by funds from the Australian Postgraduate Award, Rainforest CRC, Cairns and the School of Tropical Biology, James Cook University, Cairns. This forms part of a larger project examining the response of Australian Araucaria spp. to historical climate change.


  1. Allnutt TR, Newton AC, Lara A, Premoli A, Armesto JJ, Vergara R, Gardner M (1999) Genetic variation in Fitzroya cupressoides (alerce), a threatened South American conifer. Mol Ecol 8:975–987PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allnutt TR, Newton AC, Premoli A, Lara A (2003) Genetic variation in the threatened South American conifer Pilgerodendron uviferum (Cupressaceae), detected using RAPD markers. Biol Conserv 114:245–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bekessy SA, Allnutt TR, Premoli AC, Lara A, Ennos RA, Burgman MA, Cortes M, Newton AC (2002) Genetic variation in the vulnerable and endemic Monkey Puzzle tree, detected using RAPDs. Heredity 88:243–249PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dieters MJJ, Nikles DG, Johnson MJ (2002) Genetic improvement of conservation: a case study of Araucaria cunninghamii. In: Advances in genetic improvement of tropical tree species. Centre for Biotechnology and Tree Improvement, YogyakartaGoogle Scholar
  5. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1987) A rapid isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem Bull 19:11–15Google Scholar
  6. Excoffier L, Smouse PE, Quattro JM (1992) Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: applications to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131:479–491PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Hamrick JL, Godt MJW (1996) Conservation genetics of endemic plant species. In: Avise JC, Hamrick JL (eds) Conservation genetics. Case histories from nature. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 281–304Google Scholar
  8. Hill KD (1998) Pinophyta. In: Flora of Australia volume 48: ferns, gymnosperms and allied groups. CSIRO, Australia, pp 545–596Google Scholar
  9. Kershaw P, Wagstaff B (2001) The southern conifer family Araucariaceae: history, status, and value for paleoclimatic reconstruction. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 32:397–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Koenig WD, Ashley MV (2003) Is pollen limited? The answer is blowing in the wind. Trends Ecol Evol 18:157–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lewontin RC (1972) The apportionment of human diversity. Evol Biol 6:381–398Google Scholar
  12. Nei M (1973) Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci Biol 70:3321–3323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Nybom H (2004) Comparison of different nuclear DNA markers for estimating intraspecific genetic diversity in plants. Mol Ecol 13:1143–1155PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nybom H, Bartish IV (2000) Effects of life history traits and sampling strategies on genetic diversity estimates obtained with RAPD markers in plants. Perspect Plant Ecol 3(2):93–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Peakall R, Smouse PE (2001) GenAlEx V5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Australian National University, Canberra.
  16. Peakall R, Ebert D, Scott L, Meagher P, Offord C (2003) Comparative genetic study confirms exceptionally low genetic variation in the ancient and endangered relictual conifer, Wollemia nobilis (Araucariaceae). Mol Ecol 12:2331–2343PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Petrie CC (1904) Tom Petrie’s reminiscences of early Queensland. University of Queensland Press, BrisbaneGoogle Scholar
  18. Pluess AR, Stöcklin J (2004) Genetic diversity and fitness in Scabiosa columbaria in the Swiss Jura in relation to population size. Conserv Genet 5:145–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pole MS (2000) Mid Cretaceous conifers from the Eromanga Basin, Australia. Aust Syst Bot 13:153–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pye MG, Gadek PA (2004) Genetic diversity, differentiation and conservation in Araucaria bidwillii (Araucariaceae), Australia’s Bunya pine. Conserv Genet 5(5):619–629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pye MG, Gadek PA, Edwards KJ (2003) Diversity, divergence and species of the Australasian Callitris (Cupressaceae) and allied genera: evidence from ITS sequence data. Aust Syst Bot 16(4):505–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schaal B, Leverich WJ (1996) Molecular variation in isolated plant populations. Plant Spec Biol 11:33–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schneider S, Roessli D, Excoffier L (2000) Arlequin ver. 2.000: a software for population genetics analysis. Genetics and Biometry Laboratory, University of Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  24. Setoguchi H, Osawa TA, Pintaud J-C, Jaffré T, Veillon J-M (1998) Phylogenetic relationships within Araucariaceae based on rbcL gene sequences. Am J Bot 85(11):1507–1516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sousa VA, Hattemer HH (2003) Pollen dispersal and gene flow by pollen in Araucaria angustifolia. Aust J Bot 51:309–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Stockey RA (1994) Mesozoic Araucariaceae: morphology and systematic relationships. J Plant Res 107:493–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Yeh FC, Yang R, Boyle T (1999) PopGene Ver. 1.31. University of Alberta, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  28. Zar JH (1996) Biostatistical analysis, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, New JerseyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matthew G. Pye
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Murray J. Henwood
    • 2
  • Paul A. Gadek
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Marine and Tropical BiologyJames Cook UniversityCairnsAustralia
  2. 2.School of Biological SciencesUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations