Advertisement

Plant Systematics and Evolution

, Volume 270, Issue 3–4, pp 139–157 | Cite as

ITS phylogeny of West Asian Heracleum species and related taxa of Umbelliferae–Tordylieae W.D.J.Koch, with notes on evolution of their psbA-trnH sequences

  • M. D. LogachevaEmail author
  • C. M. Valiejo-Roman
  • M. G. Pimenov
Article

Summary

Heracleum is a large and taxonomically complex genus of the Umbelliferae–Tordylieae. The phylogenetic relationships of West Asian Heracleum species and related taxa were explored using data from sequences of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS1 and ITS2) region of nuclear ribosomal DNA. The data set consists of 56 species, of which 47 were analyzed for the first time; it represents all subdivisions of the genus Heracleum, as well as some representatives of Pastinaca complex. Heracleum was shown to be a polyphyletic genus, as its species fall into two different clades, one of which comprises also Symphyoloma and Mandenovia. Section Pubescentia was confirmed, in contrast to the sections Villosa and Heracleum being polyphyletic. A separate position of the section Wendia was supported. H. marashicum was shown to be a member of a clade comprising Pastinaca and related genera. The sequences of chloroplast psbA-trnH intergenic spacer, the region recently proposed for DNA barcoding in plants, were also analyzed for 33 species, representing all principal clades within Heracleum and its relatives. They have been proven to be very similar and not suitable for DNA barcoding in this group. However, some sequence variation was revealed. This variation could be explained by the combination of such evolutionary events as inversion and duplication. It was shown that these events are rather common in Tordylieae and can occur independently in different lineages. The evolution patterns of psbA-trnH spacer are hypothesized.

Keywords

Heracleum Tordylieae phylogeny molecular evolution ITS psbA-trninversion 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alava R (1975). A new genus of Umbelliferae (Tordyliinae) from Caucasia. Notes R Bot Gard Edinb 32(2): 189–193 Google Scholar
  2. Alverson WS, Whitelock BA, Nyffeler R, Bayer C and Baum DA (1999). Phylogeny of the core Malvales: evidence from ndhF sequence data. Amer J Bot 86: 1474–1486 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boissier E (1872) Umbelliferae. In: Flora orientalis. 2. Basel, Geneve, pp 819–1090Google Scholar
  4. Calestani V (1905). Contributo alla sistematica delle Ombrellifere d'Europa. Webbia 1: 89–280 Google Scholar
  5. Clark JL, Herendeen PS, Skog LE and Zimmer EA (2006). Phylogenetic relationships and generic boundaries in the Episcieae (Gesneriaceae) inferred from nuclear, chloroplast, and morphological data. Taxon 55(2): 313–336 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. De Candolle AP (1830) Umbelliferae. In: Prodromus systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis, 4:55–250Google Scholar
  7. Downie SR, Palmer JD (1992) Use of chloroplast DNA rearrangements in reconstructing plant phylogeny. In: Soltis P, Soltis D, Doyle JJ (eds) Plant molecular systematics, pp 14–35Google Scholar
  8. Downie SR and Katz-Downie DS (1996). A molecular phylogeny of Apiaceae subfamily Apioideae: evidence from nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer sequences. Amer J Bot 83(2): 234–251 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Downie SR, Ramanath S, Katz-Downie DS and Llanas E (1998). Molecular systematics of Apiaceae subfamily Apioideae: phylogenetic analyses of nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer and plastid rpoC1 intron sequences. Amer J Bot 85: 563–591 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Downie SR, Watson MF, Spalik K and Katz-Downie DS (2000). Molecular systematics of Old World Apioideae (Apiaceae): relationships among some members of tribe Peucedaneae sensu lato, the placement of several island-endemic species, and resolution within the apioid superclade. Canad J Bot 78: 506–528 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Doyle JJ and Doyle JL (1987). A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem Bull 19: 11–15 Google Scholar
  12. Drude O (1897–1898) Umbelliferae. In: Engler A, Prantl K (eds) Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien. 3 (8). Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig, pp 63–250Google Scholar
  13. Ekim T (1984). Some new taxa and records for Turkey. Notes R Bot Gard Edinb 42(1): 83–86 Google Scholar
  14. Felsenstein J (1985). Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783–791 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hall TA (1999). BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser 41: 95–98 Google Scholar
  16. Higgins D, Thompson J and Gibson T (1994). CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 22: 4673–4680 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hoffmann GF (1814) Genera plantarum Umbelliferarum eorumque characteres naturales secundum numerum, figuram, situm et proportionem fructificationis et fructus partium. MosquaeGoogle Scholar
  18. Huelsenbeck JP and Ronquist F (2001). MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17(8): 754–755 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Katz-Downie DS, Valiejo-Roman CM, Terentieva EI, Troitsky AV, Pimenov MG, Lee B-Y and Downie SR (1999). Towards a molecular phylogeny of Apiaceae subfamily Apioideae: additional information from nuclear ribosomal DNA ITS sequences. Pl Syst Evol 216: 167–195 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kelchner SA and Wendel JF (1996). Hairpins create minute inversions in non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Curr Genet 30: 259–262 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Komissarenko NF and Pimenov MG (1977). Coumarins of the roots of Heracleum carpaticum, H. ligusticifolium and Symphyoloma graveolens. Chem Naturalist Comp 13(1): 110–111 Google Scholar
  22. Konstantinova AI (2003) Stroenie ploda Symphyoloma graveolens C.A.Mey. i vozmozhnye korrektivy k sisteme Umbelliferae [Fruit structure of Symphyoloma graveolens C.A.Mey. and probable corrections to Umbelliferae system]. In: The materials of the XI Meeting of the Russian Bot. Soc. “Botanical Investigations in Asian Russia”, pp 61–62Google Scholar
  23. Koso-Poljansky BM (1916). Sciadophytorum sistematis lineamenta. Bull Soc Imp Neturalistes Moscou s.n. 29: 93–221 Google Scholar
  24. Koso-Poljansky BM (1924). Hydrocotyloidearum revisio. Bot Mat Gerb Glavn Bot Sada 5(2): 17–24 Google Scholar
  25. Kress WJ and Erickson DL (2007). A two-locus global DNA barcode for land plants: the coding rbcL gene complements the non-coding trnH-psbA spacer region. PLoS ONE 2(6): e508 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kress WJ, Wurdack KJ, Zimmer EA, Weigt LA and Janzen DH (2005). Use of DNA barcodes to identify flowering plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102(23): 8369–8374 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Logacheva MD (2004) Molecular phylogenetic analysis of the affinities of the genus Symphyoloma C. A. Mey. In: Proceedings of the 8th Conference of Young Botanists in St.-Petersburg, pp 245–246Google Scholar
  28. Mandenova IP (1940). O novom vide roda Tordylium L. iz Dagestana [On a new species of the genus Tordylium from Daghestan]. Zametki Sist Geogr Rast 9: 41–46 Google Scholar
  29. Mandenova IP (1950) Kavkazskie vidy roda Heracleum [Caucasian species of the genus Heracleum], Tbilisi, 104 pGoogle Scholar
  30. Mandenova IP (1951a) Symphyoloma C.A.M., Heracleum L., Stenotaenia Boiss. In: Schischkin BK (ed) Flora URSS 17: 222–260 Akad. Nauk SSSRGoogle Scholar
  31. Mandenova IP (1951b). O rode Symphyoloma C.A.Meyer [On the genus Symphyoloma C.A.Meyer]. Zametki Sist Geogr Rast 16: 81–88 Google Scholar
  32. Mandenova IP (1959). Materialy po sistematike triby Pastinaceae K.-Pol. emend. Manden. (Umbelliferae – Apioideae) [Materials on systematics of the tribe Pastinaceae K.-Pol. emend. Manden. (Umbelliferae – Apioideae)]. Trudy Tbilissk Bot Inst 20: 3–57 Google Scholar
  33. Mandenova IP (1962). Taxonomic review of Turkish species of Heracleum. Notes R Bot Gard Edinb 24(2): 173–181 Google Scholar
  34. Mandenova IP (1981). Conspectus systematis generis Heracleum L. (Umbelliferae). Zametki Sist Geogr Rast 37: 19–20 Google Scholar
  35. Mandenova IP (1987) Heracleum, Tetrataenium. In: Rechinger KH (ed) Flora Iranica 162, Akademische Druck u. Verlagsanstalt, pp 492–506Google Scholar
  36. Menemen Y, Jury S (2001) A systematic study of the genus Malabaila Hoffm. (Umbelliferae) comparing with the closely related genera. In: The Proceedings of the 2nd Balkan Botanical Congress, Istanbul, pp 299–312Google Scholar
  37. Meyer CA (1831) Verzeichniss der Pflanzen, welche während der auf Allerhöchsten Befehl in den Jahren 1829 und 1830 unternommenen Reise im Caucasus und in den Provinzen am westlichen Ufer des Caspischen Meeres gefunden und eingesammelt worden sind, St.-Petersburg, 241 pGoogle Scholar
  38. Nixon KC (2002) WinClada, version 1.00.08. Ithaca. Published by the author, http://www.cladistics.com
  39. Pimenov MG, Leonov MV (1993) The genera of Umbelliferae. Royal Botanical Gardens, KewGoogle Scholar
  40. Pimenov MG and Leonov MV (2004). Asia, the continent with the highest Umbelliferae biodiversity. S African J Bot 70(3): 417–419 Google Scholar
  41. Pimenov MG and Ostroumova TA (1994). The genus Malabaila Hoffm. (Umbelliferae: Tordylieae): A carpological investigation and taxonomic implications. Feddes Repert 105(3–4): 141–155 Google Scholar
  42. Posada D and Crandall KA (1998). Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14(9): 817–818 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sang T, Crawford DJ and Stuessy TF (1997). Chloroplast DNA phylogeny, reticulate evolution, and biogeography of Paeonia (Paeoniaceae). Amer J Bot 84: 1120–1136 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Satzyperova IF (1984) Borschtscheviki flory SSSR – novye kormovye rastenija [Heracleum species of the USSR - new fodder plants]. Leningrad, 223 pGoogle Scholar
  45. Swofford DL (2003). PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts Google Scholar
  46. Tabanca N, Douglas AW, Bedir E, Dayan FE, Kirimer N, Baser KHC, Aytac Z, Khan IA and Scheffler BE (2005). Patterns of essential oil relationships in Pimpinella (Umbeliferae) based on phylogenetic relationships using nuclear and chloroplast sequences. Pl Genet Resour 3: 149–169 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tamamschjan SG (1950). K sistematike roda Symphyoloma C.A.M. (Umbelliferae) [On systematics of the genus Symphyoloma C.A.M. (Umbelliferae)]. Bot Zhurn 35(4): 335–342 Google Scholar
  48. Tamamschjan SG (1967) Umbelliferae In: Grossheim AA (ed) Flora Kavkaza. 2nd edn 7, Nauka, pp 5–137Google Scholar
  49. Tate JA and Simpson BB (2003). Paraphyly of Tarasa (Malvaceae) and diverse origins of the polyploid species. Syst Bot 28: 723–737 Google Scholar
  50. Valiejo-Roman CM, Terentieva EI, Samigullin TH, Pimenov MG, Ghahremani-nejad F and Mozaffarian V (2006). Molecular data (nrITS-sequencing) reveal relationships among Iranian endemic taxa of the Umbelliferae. Feddes Repert 117(5–6): 367–388 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Valiejo-Roman CM, Terentieva EI, Samigullin TH and Pimenov MG (2002). nrDNA ITS sequences and affinities of Sino-Himalayan Apioideae (Umbelliferae). Taxon 51: 685–701 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Yildiz B and Kit T (1988). Thirteen new species from Turkey. Notes R Bot Gard Edinburgh 45(3): 439–451 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. D. Logacheva
    • 1
    Email author
  • C. M. Valiejo-Roman
    • 2
  • M. G. Pimenov
    • 3
  1. 1.Faculty of Bioengineering and BioinformaticsMoscow State UniversityMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Department of Evolutionary Biochemistry, A.N. Belozersky InstituteMoscow State UniversityMoscowRussia
  3. 3.Botanical Garden of Moscow State University, Moscow State UniversityMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations