Plant Systematics and Evolution

, Volume 269, Issue 3–4, pp 133–143 | Cite as

AFLP data support the recognition of a new tuber-bearing Solanum species but are uninformative about its taxonomic relationships

Article

Abstract

Solanum section Petota, containing the cultivated potato and its wild relatives, is a group of around 200 species. Many of these species are morphologically very variable with unclear boundaries, and the group as a whole appears to be somewhat over-classified. Describing a new species in this group should only be undertaken with caution, and molecular data can be used to test the distinctness of any putative new taxon. AFLP markers have shown the ability to reliably distinguish species in several groups within the genus Solanum. We tested the distinctness of a new tuber-bearing Solanum species using morphological and AFLP data, and tried to establish its affiliation to the series within the section. There was clear support for the species status of the material known as Solanum hannemanii in genebank collections, but the AFLP data were inconclusive about its relationships to the other investigated species. Also, the distinction of the series Tuberosa and Megistacroloba, to which these species belong, was not supported.

Keywords

AFLP Solanum section Petota New species Solanum hannemanii 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bernatzky R and Tanksley SD (1986). Genetics of actin regulated sequences in tomato. Theor Appl Genet 72: 314–321 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Correll DS (1962). The potato and its wild relatives. Texas Research Foundation, Renner, Texas Google Scholar
  3. Dehmer KJ and Hammer K (2004). Taxonomic status and geographic provenance of germplasm accessions in the Solanum nigrum L. complex: AFLP data. Genet Resour Crop Evol 51: 551–558 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Giannattasio RB and Spooner DM (1994). A reexamination of species boundaries and hypotheses of hybridization concerning Solanum megistacrolobum and S. toralapanum (Solanum sect. Petota, series Megistacroloba): molecular data. Syst Bot 19: 106–115 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hawkes JG (1990). The potato: evolution, biodiversity and genetic resources. Belhaven Press, London Google Scholar
  6. Kardolus JP (1998) A biosystematic analysis of Solanum acaule. Ph.D. Thesis Wageningen, Ponsen & Looijen BV, Wageningen.Google Scholar
  7. Kardolus JP, Van Eck HI and Van den Berg RG (1998). The potential of AFLPs in biosystematics: a first application in Solanum taxonomy (Solanaceae). Pl Syst Evol 210: 87–103 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Knapp S (2000). A revision of Solanum thelopodium species groups (section Anthoresis sensu Seithe, pro parte): Solanaceae. Bull Nat Hist Mus Lond (Bot) 30: 13–30 Google Scholar
  9. Koopman WJM, Zevenbergen MJ and Van den Berg RG (2001). Species relationships in Lactuca s.l. (Lactuceae, Asteraceae) inferred from AFLP fingerprints. Amer J Bot 88: 1881–1887 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lara-Cabrera SI and Spooner DM (2004). Taxonomy of North and Central American diploid wild potato (Solanum sect. Petota) species: AFLP data. Pl Syst Evol 248: 129–142 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mace ES, Gebhardt CG and Lester RN (1999a). AFLP analysis of genetic relationships in the tribe Datureae (Solanaceae). Theor Appl Genet 99: 634–641 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mace ES, Lester RN and Gebhardt CG (1999b). AFLP analysis of genetic relationships among the cultivated eggplant, Solanum melongena L. and wild relatives (Solanaceae). Theor Appl Genet 99: 626–633 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Page RDM (1996). TreeView: an application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers. Comput Appl Biosci 12: 357–358 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Rohlf FJ (2000). NTSYS-PC. Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system. Version 2.11T. Applied Biostatistics Inc, New York Google Scholar
  15. Ronquist F and Huelsenbeck JP (2003). MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 1572–1574 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. SAS Institute Inc. (1995). JMP® Statistics and Graphics Guide, Version 3.1. SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC, USA Google Scholar
  17. Spooner DM and Hijmans RJ (2001). Potato systematics and germplasm collecting, 1989–2000. Amer J Potato Res 78: 237–268 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Spooner DM and Salas A (2006). Structure, biosystematics and genetic resources. In: Gopal, J and Khurana, SMP (eds) Handbook of potato production, improvement and postharvest management, pp 1–39. The Haworth Press, Inc, Binghamton, NY Google Scholar
  19. Spooner DM, Ugarte ML and Skroch PW (1997). Species boundaries and interrelationships of two closely related sympatric diploid wild potato species, Solanum astleyi and S. boliviense, based on RAPDs. Theor Appl Genet 95: 764–771 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Spooner DM and Van den Berg RG (1992). An analysis of recent taxonomic concepts in wild potatoes (Solanum sect. Petota). Genet Resour Crop Evol 39: 23–37 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Spooner DM, Van den Berg RG, Bryan GJ and Del Rio A (2003). Species concepts and relationships in wild and cultivated potatoes. Acta Hort 619: 63–75 Google Scholar
  22. Spooner DM, Van den Berg RG, Rodriguez A, Bamberg J, Hijmans RJ and Lara-Cabrera SI (2004). Wild potatoes (Solanum section Petota; Solanaceae) of North and Central America. Syst Bot Monogr 68: 1–209 Google Scholar
  23. Swofford DL (2002). PAUP* phylogenetic analysis using parsimony and other methods, version 4 (software). Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA Google Scholar
  24. Van den Berg RG, Bryan GJ, del Rio A and Spooner DM (2002). Reduction of species in the wild potato Solanum section Petota series Longipedicellata: AFLP, RAPD and chloroplast SSR data. Theor Appl Genet 105: 1109–1114 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Van den Berg RG, Groendijk-Wilders N, Zevenbergen MJ, Spooner DM (2001) Molecular systematics of Solanum series Circaeifolia (Solanum sect. Petota) based on AFLP and RAPD markers. In: Van den Berg RG, Barendse GWM, Van der Weerden GM, Mariani C (eds) Solanaceae V: advances in taxonomy and utilization. Proceedings of the Vth International Solanaceae Conference, July 23–29th 2000, Nijmegen. Nijmegen University Press, pp 73–84Google Scholar
  26. Whalen MD (1984). Conspectus of species groups in Solanum subgenus Leptostemonum. Gentes Herb 12: 179–282 Google Scholar
  27. Wong C, Kiew R, Argent G, Set O, Lee SK and Gan YY (2002). Assessment of the validity of the sections in Musa (Musaceae) using AFLP. Ann Bot 90: 231–238 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Biosystematics GroupWageningen UniversityWageningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations