Monatshefte für Mathematik

, Volume 181, Issue 4, pp 937–965 | Cite as

Induced representations and harmonic analysis on finite groups

Article
  • 107 Downloads

Abstract

The aim of the present paper is to develop a theory of spherical functions for noncommutative Hecke algebras on finite groups. Let G be a finite group, K a subgroup and \((\theta ,V)\) an irreducible, unitary K-representation. After a careful analysis of Frobenius reciprocity, we are able to introduce an orthogonal basis in the commutant of \(\text {Ind}_K^GV\), and an associated Fourier transform. Then we translate our results in the corresponding Hecke algebra, an isomorphic algebra in the group algebra of G. Again a complete Fourier analysis is developed. As particular cases, we obtain some classical results of Curtis and Fossum on the irreducible characters. Finally, we develop a theory of Gelfand–Tsetlin bases for Hecke algebras.

Keywords

Induced representation Frobenius reciprocity Fourier transform Hecke algebra Spherical function Gelfand–Tsetlin basis 

Mathematics Subject Classification

Primary 20C15l Secondary 20C08 43A90 

References

  1. 1.
    Bump, D.: Lie groups. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, p. 225. Springer-Verlag, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ceccherini-Silberstein, T., Machì, A., Scarabotti, F., Tolli, F.: Induced representations and Mackey theory, functional analysis. J. Math. Sci. (N. Y.) 156(1), 11–28 (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ceccherini-Silberstein, T., Scarabotti, F., Tolli, F.: Trees, wreath products and finite Gelfand pairs. Adv. Math. 206(2), 503–537 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ceccherini-Silberstein, T., Scarabotti, F., Tolli, F.: Harmonic analysis on finite groups: representation theory, Gelfand pairs and Markov chains. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, p. 108. Cambridge University Press (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ceccherini-Silberstein, T., Scarabotti, F., Tolli, F.: Clifford theory and applications, functional analysis. J. Math. Sci. (N. Y.) 156(1), 29–43 (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ceccherini-Silberstein, T., Scarabotti, F., Tolli, F.: Representation theory of wreath products of finite groups, functional analysis. J. Math. Sci. (N. Y.) 156(1), 44–55 (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ceccherini-Silberstein, T., Scarabotti, F., Tolli, F.: Representation theory of the symmetric groups: the Okounkov-Vershik approach, character formulas, and partition algebras. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, p. 121. Cambridge University Press (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ceccherini-Silberstein, T., Scarabotti, F., Tolli, F.: Representation theory and harmonic analysis of wreath products of finite groups. London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, p. 410. Cambridge University Press (2014)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Curtis, C.W., Fossum, T.V.: On centralizer rings and characters of representations of finite groups. Math. Z. 107, 402–406 (1968)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Curtis, Ch.W., Reiner, I.: Methods of Representation Theory. With Applications to Finite Groups and Orders. vol. I, Pure Appl. Math. Wiley, New York (1981)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    D’Angeli, D., Donno, A.: Crested products of Markov chains. Ann. Appl. Probab. 19(1), 414–453 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    D’Angeli, D., Donno, A.: Markov chains on orthogonal block structures. Eur. J. Combin. 31(1), 34–46 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    D’Angeli, D., Donno, A.: Generalized crested products. Eur. J. Combin. 32(2), 243–257 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Diaconis, P.: Groups Representations in Probability and Statistics. IMS Hayward, CA (1988)MATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Howlett, R., Lehrer, G.: Induced cuspidal representations and generalised Hecke rings. Invent. Math. 58(1), 37–74 (1980)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mizukawa, H.: Twisted Gelfand pairs of complex reflection groups and \( r\)-congruence properties of Schur functions. Ann. Comb. 15(1), 109–125 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nebe, G.: Orthogonal Frobenius reciprocity. J. Algebra 225(1), 250–260 (2000)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Okounkov, A., Vershik, A.M.: A new approach to the representation theory of symmetric groups. II (Russian), Zap.Nauchn. Sem. S.Petersburg. Otdel. Mat. Inst. Steklov. (POMI) 307 (2004), Teor. Predst. Din. Sist. Komb. i Algoritm. Metody. 10, 57–98, 281; translation in J. Math. Sci. (N.Y.) 131(2), 5471–5494 (2005)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Piatetski-Shapiro, I.: Complex Representations of GL(2,K) for Finite Fields K. Contemporary Mathematics, 16. American Mathematical Society, Providence, R.I. (1983)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Scarabotti, F.: Time to reach stationarity in the Bernoulli-Laplace diffusion model with many urns. Adv. Appl. Math. 18(3), 351–371 (1997)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Scarabotti, F., Tolli, F.: Harmonic analysis on a finite homogeneous space. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) 100(2), 348–376 (2010)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Scarabotti, F., Tolli, F.: Harmonic analysis on a finite homogeneous space II: the Gelfand Tsetlin decomposition. Forum Math. 22, 897–911 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Scarabotti, F., Tolli, F.: Fourier analysis of subgroup-conjugacy invariant functions on finite groups. Monatsh. Math. 170(3–4), 465–479 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Scarabotti, F., Tolli, F.: Hecke algebras and harmonic analysis on finite groups. Rend. Mat. Appl. VII 33, 27–52 (2013)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Stembridge, J.R.: On Schur’s Q-functions and the primitive idempotents of a commutative Hecke algebra. J. Algebr. Comb. 1, 71–95 (1992)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Terras, A.: Fourier Analysis on Finite Groups and Applications. London Mathematical Society Student Texts, p. 43. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento SBAIUniversità degli Studi di Roma “La Sapienza”RomeItaly
  2. 2.Dipartimento di Matematica e FisicaUniversità Roma TRERomeItaly

Personalised recommendations