A note on the quantization for probability measures with respect to the geometric mean error
- 85 Downloads
- 3 Citations
Abstract
We study the quantization with respect to the geometric mean error for probability measures μ on \({\mathbb{R}^d}\) for which there exist some constants C, η > 0 such that \({\mu(B(x,\varepsilon))\leq C\varepsilon^\eta}\) for all ε > 0 and all \({x\in\mathbb{R}^d}\) . For such measures μ, we prove that the upper quantization dimension \({\overline{D}(\mu)}\) of μ is bounded from above by its upper packing dimension and the lower one \({\underline{D}(\mu)}\) is bounded from below by its lower Hausdorff dimension. This enables us to calculate the quantization dimension for a large class of probability measures which have nice local behavior, including the self-affine measures on general Sierpiński carpets and self-conformal measures. Moreover, based on our previous work, we prove that the upper and lower quantization coefficient for a self-conformal measure are both positive and finite.
Keywords
Quantization Geometric mean error Self-affine measures General Sierpiński carpets Self-conformal measuresMathematics Subject Classification (2000)
28A80 28A78 94A15Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Bedford, T.: Crinkly curves, Markov partitions and box dimensions in self-similar sets. PhD Thesis, University of Warwick (1984)Google Scholar
- 2.Csiszár, I.: Generalized entropy and quantization problems. In: Transactions on 6th Prague Conference on Information Theory, Statistics, Decision functions, Random Processes, pp. 159–174 (1973)Google Scholar
- 3.Elias P.: Bounds and asymptotes for the performance of multi-variate quantizers. Ann. Math. Stat. 41, 1249–1259 (1970)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Falconer K.J.: Techniques in Fractal geometry. John Wiley & Sons, New York (1997)MATHGoogle Scholar
- 5.Graf, S., Luschgy, H.: Foundations of quantization for probability distributions. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1730. Springer, Berlin (2000)Google Scholar
- 6.Graf S., Luschgy H.: Asymptotics of the quantization error for self-similar probabilities. Real. Anal. Exch. 26, 795–810 (2001)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- 7.Graf S., Luschgy H.: Quantization for probabilitiy measures with respect to the geometric mean error. Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 136, 687–717 (2004)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Gui Y.X., Li W.X.: Multiscale self-affine Sierpiński carpets. Nonlinearity 23, 495–512 (2010)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Hutchinson J.E.: Fractals and self-similarity. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 30, 713–747 (1981)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.King J.F.: The singularity spectrum for general Sierpński carpets. Adv. Math. 116, 1–11 (1995)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Lalley S.P., Gatzouras D.: Hausdorff and box dimensions of certain self-affine fractals. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 41, 533–568 (1992)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Lindsay L.J., Mauldin R.D.: Quantization dimension for conformal iterated function systems. Nonlinearity 15, 189–199 (2002)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Mcmullen C.: The Hausdorff dimension of general Sierpiński carpets. Nagoya Math. J. 96, 1–9 (1984)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- 14.Pagès G.: A space quantization method for numerical integration. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 89, 1–38 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Patzschke N.: Self-conformal multifractal measures. Adv. Appl. Math 19, 486–513 (1997)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Peres Y., Rams M., Simon K., Solomyak B.: Equivalence of positive Hausdorff measure and the open set condition for self-conformal sets. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 129, 2689–2699 (2001)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Pötzelberger K.: The quantization dimension of distributions. Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 131, 507–519 (2001)MATHGoogle Scholar
- 18.Zador P.L.: Asymptotic quantization error of continuous signals and the quantization dimension. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 28, 139–149 (1982)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Zhu S.: The quantization for self-conformal measures with respect to the geometric mean error. Nonlinearity 23, 2849–2866 (2010)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar