Advertisement

Microchimica Acta

, 186:622 | Cite as

Ultrasound-assisted solid-phase extraction of parabens from environmental and biological samples using magnetic hydroxyapatite nanoparticles as an efficient and regenerable nanosorbent

  • Ensieh GhasemiEmail author
  • Mika Sillanpää
Original Paper
  • 7 Downloads

Abstract

Magnetic hydroxyapatite nanoparticles (γ-Fe2O3@HAP) are shown to be a viable sorbent for the preconcentration and adsorption of parabens (specifically of methyl-, ethyl-, propyl-, butyl-, pentyl-, phenyl- and benzylparaben). The average diameter of the magnetic γ-Fe2O3@HAP nanoadsorbents is 25 nm. The effects of amount of nanoadsorbent, pH value and time of adsorption on the adsorption efficiency were studied by chemometry and optimized using a Box–Behnken design, and the respective response surface equations were derived. The loaded magnetic nanoadsorbent can be removed from the aqueous sample by applying an external magnetic field. Following extraction with acetonitrile, the parabens were quantified by gas chromatography with mass spectrometric detection. Under optimum condition, the limit of detection (LOD) and adsorption efficiencies of the method are in the range from 5 to 10 μg L−1 and 95–106%, respectively. The preconcentration factors range from 320 to 350. The results demonstrate that this nanoadsorbent can be applied to the removal of parabens from different water, soil, beverage and urine samples.

Graphical abstract

Schematic representation of ultrasound-assisted solid-phase extraction of parabens from environmental and biological samples by γ-Fe2O3@HAP nanoadsorbent as a new and effective method with high reproducibility and reusability.

Keywords

γ-Fe2O3@HAP Emerging pollutants Removal Real samples Cosmetics 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.

Supplementary material

604_2019_3720_MOESM1_ESM.docx (235 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 235 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Ocãna-González JA, Villar-Navarro M, Ramos-Payán M et al (2015) New developments in the extraction and determination of parabens in cosmetics and environmental samples. Anal Chim Acta 858:1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2014.07.002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Calafat AM, Ye XY, Wong LY, Bishop AM, Needham LL (2010) Urinary concentrations of four parabens in the US population: NHANES 2005–2006. Environ Health Perspect 118:679–685.  https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.0901560 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bledzka D, Gromadzinska J, Wasowicz W (2014) Parabens. From environmental studies to human health. Environ Int 67:27–42.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2014.02.007 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Darbre PD, Aljarrah A, Miller WR, Coldham NG, Sauer MJ, Pope GS (2004) Concentrations of parabens in human breast tumours. J Appl Toxicol 24:5–13.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jat.958 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jiang JQ, Zhou Z, Sharma VK (2013) Occurrence, transportation, monitoring and treatment of emerging micro-pollutants in waste water-a review from global views. Microchem J 110:292–300.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2013.04.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Geissen V, Mol H, Klumpp E, Umlauf G, Nadal M, van der Ploeg M, van de Zee SEATM, Ritsema CJ (2015) Emerging pollutants in the environment: a challenge for water resource management. Int Soil Water Conserv Res 3:57–65.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2015.03.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Carasek E, Merib J, Mafra G, Spudeit D (2018) A recent overview of the application of liquid-phase microextraction to the determination of organic micro-pollutants. TrAC Trends Anal Chem 108:203–209.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2018.09.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Trellu C, Chaplin BP, Coetsier C, Esmilaire R, Cerneaux S, Causserand C, Cretin M (2018) Electro-oxidation of organic pollutants by reactive electrochemical membranes. Chemosphere. 208:159–175.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.05.026 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jiang N, Shang R, Heijman SGJ, Rietveld LC (2018) High-silica zeolites for adsorption of organic micro-pollutants in water treatment. Water Res 144:145–161.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.07.017 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nagpal M, Kakkar R (2019) Use of metal oxides for the adsorptive removal of toxic organic-pollutants. Sep Purif Technol 211:522–539.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2018.10.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Buffa A, Mandler D (2018) Adsorption and detection of organic pollutants by fixed bed carbon nanotube electrochemical membrane. Chem Eng J 359:130–137.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.11.069 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lambert JF (2018) 7: organic pollutants adsorption on clay minerals. Developments Clay Sci 9:195–253.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102432-4.00007-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhang G, Liu Y, Zheng S, Hashisho Z (2019) Adsorption of volatile organic compounds onto natural porous minerals. J Hazard Mater 364:317–324.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.10.031 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Song Y, Hao DL, Wang C et al (2019) Green synthesis of o-hydroxyazobenzene porous organic polymer for efficient adsorption of aromatic compounds. J Chromatogr A 1583:39–47.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2018.11.016 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liu S, Hu Q, Zheng J, Xie L, Wei S, Jiang R, Zhu F, Liu Y, Ouyang G (2016) Knitting aromatic polymers for efficient solid-phase microextraction of trace organic pollutants. J Chromatogr A 1450:9–16.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2016.04.065 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Farré M, Kantiani L, Petrovic M, Pérez S, Barceló D (2012) Achievements and future trends in the analysis of emerging organic contaminants in environmental samples by mass spectrometry and bioanalytical techniques. J Chromatogr A 1259:86–99.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2012.07.024 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lompe KM, Menard D, Barbeau B (2017) The influence of iron oxide nanoparticles upon the adsorption of organic matter on magnetic powdered activated carbon. Water Res 123:30–39.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.06.045 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Huang D, Wu J, Wang L, Liu X, Meng J, Tang X, Tang C, Xu J (2019) Novel insight into adsorption and co-adsorption of heavy metal ions and an organic pollutant by magnetic graphene nanomaterials in water. Chem Eng J 358:1399–1409.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.10.138 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ghasemi E, Heydari A, Sillanpää M (2017) Superparamagnetic Fe3O4@ EDTA nanoparticles as an efficient adsorbent for simultaneous removal of Ag(I), Hg(II), Mn(II), Zn(II), Pb(II) and Cd(II) from water and soil environmental samples. Microchem J 131:51–56.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2016.11.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ghasemi E, Heydari A, Sillanpää M (2019) Central composite design for optimization of removal of trace amounts of toxic heavy metal ions from aqueous solution using magnetic Fe3O4 functionalized by guanidine acetic acid as an efficient nano-adsorbent. Microchem J 147:133–141.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2019.02.056 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhou M, He Z, Wang T, Xu Y, Yu W, Shi B, Huang K (2019) Carboxyl group functionalized hollow microporous organic nanospheres for efficient catalysis and adsorption. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 274:245–250.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2018.08.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pamidimukkala PS, Soni H (2018) Efficient removal of organic pollutants with activated carbon derived from palm shell: spectroscopic characterisation and experimental optimisation. J Environ Chem Eng 6:3135–3149.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2018.04.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Márquez Brazón E, Piccirillo C, Moreira IS, Castro PML (2016) Photodegradation of pharmaceutical persistent pollutant using hydroxyapatite-based materials. J Environ Manag 182:486–495.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.08.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Li L, Iqbal J, Zhu Y, Zhang P, Chen W, Bhatnagar A, Du Y (2018) Chitosan/Ag-hydroxyapatite nanocomposite beads as a potential adsorbent for the efficient removal of toxic aquatic pollutants. Int J Biol Macromol 120:1752–1759.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.09.190 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dastoorian F, Salem A, Salem S (2018) Fabrication of poorly crystalline hydroxyapatite nano-particles by rapid auto-ignition route as efficient adsorbent for removal of disperse blue dye. J Alloys Compd 766:729–738.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.07.042 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mehta D, Mazumdar S, Singh SK (2015) Magnetic adsorbents for the treatment of water/wastewater-a review. J Water Process Eng 7:244–265.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2015.07.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ghasemi E, Sillanpää M (2015) Magnetic hydroxyapatite nanoparticles: an efficient adsorbent for the separation and removal of nitrate and nitrite ions from environmental samples. J Sep Sci 38:164–169.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jssc.201400928 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yazdi MN, Yamini Y, Asiabi H (2018) Fabrication of polypyrrole-silver nanocomposite for hollow fiber solid phase microextraction followed by HPLC/UV analysis for determination of parabens in water and beverages samples. J Food Compos Anal 74:18–26.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2018.08.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pastor-Belda M, Marín-Soler L, Campillo N, Viñas P, Hernández-Córdoba M (2018) Magnetic carbon nanotube composite for the preconcentration ofparabens from water and urine samples using dispersive solid phaseextraction. J Chromatogr A 1564:102–109.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2018.06.025 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kajornkavinkul S, Punrat E, Siangproh W, Rodthongkum N, Praphairaksit N, Chailapakul O (2016) Graphene/polyvinylpyrrolidone/polyanilinenanocomposite-modified electrode for simultaneous determination of parabens by high performance liquid chromatography. Talanta 148:655–660.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2015.05.044 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Makkliang F, Kanatharana P, Thavarungkul P, Thammakhet-Buranachai C (2018) A miniaturized monolith-MWCNTs-COOH multi-stir-rod microextractor device for trace parabens determination in cosmetic and personal care products. Talanta 184:429–436.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2018.03.024 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Becerra-Herrera M, Miranda V, Arismendi D, Richter P (2018) Chemometric optimization of the extraction and derivatization of parabens for their determination in water samples by rotating-disk sorptive extraction and gas chromatography mass spectrometry. Talanta 176:551–557.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2017.08.071 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Fumes BH, Lanc FM (2017) Use of graphene supported on aminopropyl silica for microextraction of parabens from water samples. J Chromatogr A 1487:64–71.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2017.01.063 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Dias AN, Silva AC, Simao V et al (2015) A novel approach to bar adsorptive microextraction: Cork as extractor phase for determination of benzophenone, triclocarban and parabens in aqueous samples. Anal Chim Acta 888:59–66.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2015.07.011 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Almeida C, Nogueira JMF (2014) Determination of trace levels of parabens in real matrices by Bar Adsorptive Microextraction (BAμE) using selective sorbent phases. J Chromatogr A 1348:17–26.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2014.04.057 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Tehran Medical SciencesIslamic Azad UniversityTehranIran
  2. 2.Department of Green Chemistry, School of Engineering ScienceLappeenranta University of TechnologyMikkeliFinland

Personalised recommendations