Advertisement

Microchimica Acta

, 186:101 | Cite as

An amino-modified metal-organic framework (type UiO-66-NH2) loaded with cadmium(II) and lead(II) ions for simultaneous electrochemical immunosensing of triazophos and thiacloprid

  • Yong Yang
  • Jingli Cheng
  • Biao Wang
  • Yirong Guo
  • Xiaowu Dong
  • Jinhao Zhao
Original Paper
  • 38 Downloads

Abstract

A method is described for simultaneous voltammetric determination of the pesticides triazophos (TRS) and thiacloprid (THD). A glassy carbon electrode (GCE) was modified with a metal-organic framework (type UiO-66-NH2) which has a large specific surface (1018 m2·g−1) and contains large amounts of Cd(II) and Pb(II) ions, with adsorption capacities of 230 and 271 mg·g−1, respectively. The antigen-loaded particles were then bound to antibody, magnetically separated, and analyzed by square wave voltammetry to give signals for Cd(II) and Pb(II) at −0.82 and − 0.56 V (vs. Ag/AgCl) for TRS and THD, respectively. Under optimized conditions, the method has a wide linear range (0.2–750 ng·mL−1) and low detection limits (0.07 and 0.1 ng·mL−1 at a S/N of 3 for TRS and THD, respectively). It is perceived that this assay represents a useful tool for simultaneous determination of multiple pesticide residues. The method has a wide scope in that may be extended to monitoring of other small organic pollutants by changing the types of metal ions and by using other antibodies.

Graphical abstract

Schematic presentation of an amino-modified metal-organic framework (type UiO-66-NH2) loaded with Cd(II) and Pb(II) ions for simultaneous electrochemical immunosensing of triazophos (TRS) and thiacloprid (THD). It is based on the fabrication of antigen (Ab)-immobilized UiO-66-NH2-based signal tags (a), and of an antibody (Ab)-immobilized magnetic bead (MB-COOH)-based capture probes (b).

Keywords

MOF UiO-66-NH2 Simultaneous voltammetric determination Electrochemical immunosensing Multiple pesticide residues Square wave voltammetry Cd(II) ion Pb(II) ion 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported financially by the Experimental Technology Research Project of Zhejiang University (No. SJS201710) and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFD0200804, 2017YFF0210200, 2017YFD0201805).

Compliance with ethical standards

The author(s) declare that they have no competing interest.

Supplementary material

604_2018_3201_MOESM1_ESM.docx (19.1 mb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 19.0 mb)

References

  1. 1.
    Li L, Zhou S, Jin L, Zhang C, Liu W (2010) Enantiomeric separation of organophosphorus pesticides by high-performance liquid chromatography, gas chromatography and capillary electrophoresis and their applications to environmental fate and toxicity assays. J Chromatogr B 878(17–18):1264–1276Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lara-Ortega FJ, Robles-Molina J, Brandt S, Schutz A, Gilbert-Lopez B, Molina-Diaz A, Garcia-Reyes JF, Franzke J (2018) Use of dielectric barrier discharge ionization to minimize matrix effects and expand coverage in pesticide residue analysis by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Anal Chim Acta 1020:76–85PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Haraga T, Ouchi K, Sato Y, Hoshino H, Tanaka R, Fujihara T, Kurokawa H, Shibukawa M, Ishimori KI, Kameo Y, Saito S (2018) Safe and rapid development of capillary electrophoresis for ultratrace uranyl ions in radioactive samples by way of fluorescent probe selection for actinide ions from a chemical library. Anal Chim Acta 1032:188–196PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jin S, Xu Z, Chen J, Liang X, Wu Y, Qian X (2004) Determination of organophosphate and carbamate pesticides based on enzyme inhibition using a pH-sensitive fluorescence probe. Anal Chim Acta 523(1):117–123Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mishra A, Kumar J, Melo JS (2017) An optical microplate biosensor for the detection of methyl parathion pesticide using a biohybrid of Sphingomonas sp. cells-silica nanoparticles. Biosens Bioelectron 87:332–338PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Felix FS, Angnes L (2018) Electrochemical immunosensors - a powerful tool for analytical applications. Biosens Bioelectron 102:470–478PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cho IH, Lee J, Kim J, Kang MS, Paik JK, Ku S, Cho HM, Irudayaraj J, Kim DH (2018) Current technologies of electrochemical immunosensors: perspective on signal amplification. Sensors 18(1):207–225Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhao Y, Liu L, Kong D, Kuang H, Wang L, Xu C (2014) Dual amplified electrochemical immunosensor for highly sensitive detection of Pantoea stewartii sbusp. stewartii. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6(23):21178–21183PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kokkinos C, Economou A, Prodromidis MI (2016) Electrochemical immunosensors: critical survey of different architectures and transduction strategies. TrAC Trends Anal Chem 79:88–105Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dridi F, Marrakchi M, Gargouri M, Saulnier J, Jaffrezic-Renault N, Lagarde F (2017) Nanomaterial-based electrochemical biosensors for food safety and quality assessment. Nanobiosensors 167–204Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liu TZ, Hu R, Zhang X, Zhang KL, Liu Y, Zhang XB, Bai RY, Li D, Yang YH (2016) Metal-organic framework nanomaterials as novel signal probes for electron transfer mediated ultrasensitive electrochemical immunoassay. Anal Chem 88(24):12516–12523PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chen M, Gan N, Zhou Y, Li T, Xu Q, Cao Y, Chen Y (2017) A novel aptamer- metal ions- nanoscale MOF based electrochemical biocodes for multiple antibiotics detection and signal amplification. Sensors Actuators B Chem 242:1201–1209Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhang P, Sun H, Min L, Ren C (2018) Biochars change the sorption and degradation of thiacloprid in soil: insights into chemical and biological mechanisms. Environ Pollut 236:158–167PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bhamore JR, Ganguly P, Kailasa SK (2016) Molecular assembly of 3-mercaptopropinonic acid and guanidine acetic acid on silver nanoparticles for selective colorimetric detection of triazophos in water and food samples. Sensors Actuators B Chem 233:486–495Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liu ZJ, Wei X, Xu H, Li M, Zhu GB, Xue YL, Zhang Z, Zhao GD, Du DL (2016) Sensitive detection of thiacloprid in environmental and food samples by enhanced chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay. RSC Adv 6(35):29460–29465Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Guo Y, Liu R, Liu Y, Xiang D, Liu Y, Gui W, Li M, Zhu G (2018) A non-competitive surface plasmon resonance immunosensor for rapid detection of triazophos residue in environmental and agricultural samples. Sci Total Environ 613-614:783–791PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Liu R, Liu Y, Lan MJ, Taheri N, Cheng JL, Guo YR (2016) Evaluation of a water-soluble adjuvant for the development of monoclonal antibodies against small-molecule compounds. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B 17(4):282–293PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Liu Z, Li M, Shi H, Wang M (2013) Development and evaluation of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the determination of thiacloprid in agricultural samples. Food Anal Methods 6(2):691–697Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lin S, Kumar Reddy DH, Bediako JK, Song M-H, Wei W, Kim J-A, Yun Y-S (2017) Effective adsorption of Pd(ii), Pt(iv) and Au(iii) by Zr(iv)-based metal–organic frameworks from strongly acidic solutions. J Mater Chem A 5(26):13557–13564Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yan L, Crayton SH, Thawani JP, Amirshaghaghi A, Tsourkas A, Cheng Z (2015) A pH-responsive drug-delivery platform based on glycol chitosan-coated liposomes. Small 11(37):4870–4874PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Charalambous A, Economou A (2005) A study on the utility of bismuth-film electrodes for the determination of In(III) in the presence of Pb(II) and Cd(II) by square wave anodic stripping voltammetry. Anal Chim Acta 547(1):53–58Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mirceski V, Hocevar SB, Ogorevc B, Gulaboski R, Drangov I (2012) Diagnostics of anodic stripping mechanisms under square-wave voltammetry conditions using bismuth film substrates. Anal Chem 84(10):4429–4436PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    De Figueiredo-Filho LCS, Baccarin M, Janegitz BC, Fatibello-Filho O (2017) A disposable and inexpensive bismuth film minisensor for a voltammetric determination of diquat and paraquat pesticides in natural water samples. Sensors Actuators B Chem 240:749–756Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wang X, Zhao X, Zhang D, Li G, Li H (2018) Microwave irradiation induced UIO-66-NH2 anchored on graphene with high activity for photocatalytic reduction of CO2. Appl Catal B Environ 228:47–53Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Abid HR, Ang HM, Wang S (2012) Effects of ammonium hydroxide on the structure and gas adsorption of nanosized Zr-MOFs (UiO-66). Nanoscale 4(10):3089–3094Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Liu ZJ, Yan X, Xu XY, Wang MH (2013) Development of a chemiluminescence enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the simultaneous detection of imidaclothiz and thiacloprid in agricultural samples. Analyst 138(11):3280–3286PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Li H, Yan X, Shi H, Yang X (2014) Development of a bi-enzyme tracer competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of thiacloprid and imidaclothiz in agricultural samples. Food Chem 164:166–172PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Liu Y, Cao N, Gui W, Ma Q (2018) Nitrogen-doped graphene quantum dots-based fluorescence molecularly imprinted sensor for thiacloprid detection. Talanta 183:339–344PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Moyakao K, Santaladchaiyakit Y, Srijaranai S, Vichapong J (2018) Preconcentration of trace neonicotinoid insecticide residues using vortex-assisted dispersive micro solid-phase extraction with montmorillonite as an efficient sorbent. Molecules 23(4):883–898PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Du P, Jin M, Chen G, Zhang C, Cui X, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Zou P, Jiang Z, Cao X (2017) Competitive colorimetric triazophos immunoassay employing magnetic microspheres and multi-labeled gold nanoparticles along with enzymatic signal enhancement. Microchim Acta 184(99):1–8Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Li H, Xie T, Ye L, Wang Y, Xie C (2017) Core-shell magnetic molecularly imprinted polymer nanoparticles for the extraction of triazophos residues from vegetables. Microchim Acta 184(4):1–9Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kandiah M, Nilsen MH, Usseglio S, Jakobsen S, Olsbye U, Tilset M, Larabi C, Quadrelli EA, Bonino F, Lillerud KP (2010) Synthesis and stability of tagged UiO-66 Zr-MOFs. Chem Mater 22(24):6632–6640Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Aguilera-Sigalat J, Bradshaw D (2014) A colloidal water-stable MOF as a broad-range fluorescent pH sensor via post-synthetic modification. Chem Commun 50(36):4711–4713Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yong Yang
    • 1
  • Jingli Cheng
    • 1
  • Biao Wang
    • 1
  • Yirong Guo
    • 1
  • Xiaowu Dong
    • 2
  • Jinhao Zhao
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Pesticide and Environmental Toxicology, Ministry of Agriculture Key Lab of Molecular Biology of Crop Pathogens and InsertsZhejiang UniversityHangzhouPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Hangzhou Institute of Innovative Medicine, College of Pharmaceutical SciencesZhejiang UniversityHangzhouPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations