Advertisement

Microchimica Acta

, 185:460 | Cite as

Impedimetric determination of Staphylococcal enterotoxin B using electrochemical switching with DNA triangular pyramid frustum nanostructure

  • Xiaoye Chen
  • Xinping Shi
  • Yun Liu
  • Lixia Lu
  • Yichen Lu
  • Xiong Xiong
  • Yuanjian Liu
  • Xiaohui Xiong
Original Paper

Abstract

An electrochemical switching strategy is presented for the sensitive determination of Staphylococcus enterotoxin B (SEB). It is based on the use of DNA triangular pyramid frustum nanostructure (TPFDNA) consisting of (a) three thiolated probes, (b) one auxiliary probe, and (c) an aptamer against SEB. The TPFDNA was assembled on the gold electrode, with the SEB aptamer designed on top of the TPFDNA. The electron transfer to hexacyanoferrate acting as an electrochemical probe is strongly inhibited in the TPFDNA-modified electrode. This is assumed to be due to the formation of a 3D TPFDNA structure that limits access of hexacyanoferrate to the electrode. Therefore, the Faradaic impedance is large. However, in the presence of SEB, it will bind to the aptamer and dehybridize the hybrid formed between aptamer and its complementary sequence. As a result, the TPFDNA nanostructure changes to an equilateral triangle DNA nanostructure. This results in a more efficient electron transfer and a smaller Faradaic impedance. The method has a detection limit of 0.17 ng mL−1 of SEB (at an S/N of 3) and a dynamic range that covers the 0.2–1000 ng mL−1 concentration range. The applicability and reliability of the method was demonstrated by anayzing (spiked) milk samples, and the results were compared to those obtained with an ELISA kit. The relative standard deviations between the two methods range between −6.59 and 9.33%.

Graphical abstract

An electrochemical switching strategy is presented for the sensitive detection of Staphylococcus enterotoxin B based on 3D DNA structure conversion of nanostructure from triangular pyramid frustum to equilateral triangle.

Keywords

Triangular pyramid frustum nanostructure Aptamer Staphylococcus aureus Electrochemical biosensor Gold electrode Hexacyanoferrate Electron transfer Double-layer barrier Faradaic impedance ELISA 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 31701688, 21707070), and the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province of China (grant no. BK20170998).

Compliance with ethical standards

The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.

Supplementary material

604_2018_2983_MOESM1_ESM.docx (199 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 198 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Pinchuk IV, Beswick EJ, Reyes VE (2010) Staphylococcal enterotoxins. Toxins 2:2177–2197.  https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins2082177 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wang HW, Wang HH, Liang LJ, Xu XL, Zhou GH (2018) Prevalence, genetic characterization and biofilm formation in vitro of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from raw chicken meat at retail level in Nanjing, China. Food Control 86:11–18.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2017.10.028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nunes MM, Caldas ED (2017) Preliminary quantitative microbial risk assessment for Staphylococcus enterotoxins in fresh minas cheese, a popular food in Brazil. Food Control 73:524–531.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.08.046 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fisher EL, Otto M, Cheung GYC (2018) Basis of virulence in enterotoxin-mediated staphylococcal food poisoning. Front Microbiol 9(436).  https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.00436
  5. 5.
    Wang WB, Wang WW, Liu LQ, Xu LG, Kuang H, Zhu JP, Xu CL (2016) Nanoshell-enhanced Raman spectroscopy on a microplate for staphylococcal enterotoxin B sensing. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:15591–15597.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b02905 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sorensen M, Klingenberg C, Wickman M, Sollid JUE, Furberg AS, Bachert C, Bousquet J (2017) Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxin sensitization is associated with allergic poly-sensitization and allergic multimorbidity in adolescents. Allergy 72:1548–1555.  https://doi.org/10.1111/all.13175 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Singh PK, Agrawal R, Kamboj DV, Gupta G, Boopathi M, Goel AK, Singh L (2010) Construction of a single-chain variable-fragment antibody against the superantigen staphylococcal enterotoxin B. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:8184–8191.  https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01441-10 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Deng RN, Wang L, Yi GZ, Hua EH, Xie GM (2014) Target-induced aptamer release strategy based on electrochemical detection of staphylococcal enterotoxin B using GNPs-ZrO2-chits film. Colloid Surf B 120:1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2014.04.028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wu SJ, Duan N, Gu HJ, Hao LL, Ye H, Gong WH, Wang ZP (2016) A review of the methods for detection of Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxins. Toxins 8:176.  https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins8070176 CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rodriguez A, Gordillo R, Andrade MJ, Cordoba JJ, Rodriguez M (2016) Development of an efficient real-time PCR assay to quantify enterotoxin-producing staphylococci in meat products. Food Control 60:302–308.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.07.040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ludwig S, Jimenez-Bush I, Brigham E, Bose S, Diette G, McCormack MC, Matsui EC, Davis MF (2017) Analysis of home dust for Staphylococcus aureus and staphylococcal enterotoxin genes using quantitative PCR. Sci Total Environ 581:750–755.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Andjelkovic M, Tsilia V, Rajkovic A, De Cremer K, VanLoco J (2016) Application of LC-MS/MS MRM to determine staphylococcal enterotoxins (SEB and SEA) in milk. Toxins 8:118.  https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins8040118 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mondal B, Bhavanashri N, Ramial S, Kingston J (2018) Colorimetric DNAzyme biosensor for convenience detection of enterotoxin B harboring Staphylococcus aureus from food samples. J Agric Food Chem 66:1516–1522.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jfc.7b04820 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wang XL, Huang YK, Wu SJ, Duan N, Xu BC, Wang ZP (2016) Simultaneous detection of Staphylococcus aureus and Salmonella typhimurium using multicolor time-resolved fluorescence nanoparticles as labels. Int J Food Microbiol 237:172–179.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.08.028 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wu LY, Gao B, Zhang F, Sun XL, Zhang YZ, Li ZJ (2013) A novel electrochemical immunosensor based on magnetosomes for detection of staphylococcal enterotoxin B in milk. Talanta 106:360–366.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2012.12.053 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Seshadri P, Manoli K, Schneiderhan-Marra N, Anthes U, Wierzchowiec P, Bonrad K, DiFranco CD, Torsi L (2018) Low-picomolar, label-free procalcitonin analytical detection with an electrolyte-gated organic field-effect transistor based electronic immunosensor. Biosens Bioelectron 104:113–119.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2017.12.041 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Abnous K, Danesh NM, Alibolandi M, Ramezani M, Emrani AS, Zolfaghari R, Taghdisi SM (2017) A new amplified π-shape electrochemical aptasensor for ultrasensitive detection of aflatoxin B1. Biosens Bioelectron 94:374–379.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2017.03.028 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zheng WL, Teng J, Cheng L, Ye YW, Pan DD, Wu JJ, Xue F, Liu GD, Chen W (2016) Hetero-enzyme-based two-round signal amplification strategy for trace detection of aflatoxin B1 using an electrochemical aptasensor. Biosens Bioelectron 80:574–581.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2016.01.091 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nguyen VT, Kwon YS, Gu MB (2017) Aptamer-based environmental biosensors for small molecule contaminants. Curr Opin Biotechnol 45:15–23.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2016.11.020 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mondal B, Ramlal S, Lavu PS, Bhavanashri N, Kingston J (2018) Highly sensitive colorimetric biosensor for staphylococcal enterotoxin B by a label-free aptamer and gold nanoparticles. Front Microbiol 9(179).  https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.00179
  21. 21.
    Hasanzadeh M, Shadjou N, delaGuardia M (2017) Aptamer-based assay of biomolecules: recent advances in electro-analytical approach. Trac-Trend Anal Chem 89:119–132.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2017.02.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zeng Y, Zhang D, Qi P, Zheng LB (2017) Colorimetric detection of DNA by using target catalyzed DNA nanostructure assembly and unmodified gold nanoparticles. Microchim Acta 184:4809–4815.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-017-2463-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Huang RR, He NY, Li ZY (2018) Recent progresses in DNA nanostructure-based biosensors for detection of tumor markers. Biosens Bioelectron 109:27–34.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2018.02.053 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Taghdisi SM, Danesh NM, Ramezani M, Emrani AS, Abnous K (2016) A novel electrochemical aptasensor based on Y-shape structure of dual-aptamer-complementary strand conjugate for ultrasensitive detection of myoglobin. Biosens Bioelectron 80:532–537.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2016.02.029 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sheng QL, Liu RX, Zhang S, Zheng JB (2014) Ultrasensitive electrochemical cocaine biosensor based on reversible DNA nanostructure. Biosens Bioelectron 51:191–194.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2013.07.053 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Coll Food Sci & Light IndNanjing Tech UniversityNanjingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations