Microchimica Acta

, Volume 170, Issue 3–4, pp 307–312

A sensitive mercury (II) sensor based on CuO nanoshuttles/poly(thionine) modified glassy carbon electrode

Original Paper


Shuttle-like copper oxide (CuO) was prepared by a hydrothermal decomposition process. The resulting material was characterized by scanning electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction. It was then immobilized on the surface of a glassy carbon electrode modified with a film of poly(thionine). A pair of well-defined and reversible redox peaks for Hg(II) was observed with the resulting electrode in pH 7.0 solutions. The anodic and cathodic peak potentials occurred at 0.260 V and 0.220 V (vs. Ag/AgCl), respectively. The modified electrode displayed excellent amperometric response to Hg(II), with a linear range from 40 nM to 5.0 mM and a detection limit of 8.5 nM at a signal-to-noise ratio of 3. The sensor exhibited high selectivity and reproducibility and was successfully applied to the determination of Hg(II) in water samples.


CuO nanoshuttle Hg2+ Poly(thionine) Sensor 

Supplementary material

604_2010_359_MOESM1_ESM.doc (746 kb)
ESM 1(DOC 746 kb)


  1. 1.
    Irwin RJ, VanMouwerik M, Stevens L, Seese MD, Basham W (1997) Environmental contaminants encyclopedia. National Park Service, Water Resources Division, Fort Collins, ColoradoGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Khan AA, Inamuddin (2006) Applications of Hg(II) sensitive polyaniline Sn(IV) phosphate composite cation-exchange material in determination of Hg2+ from aqueous solutions and in making ion-selective membrane electrode. Sens Actuators B 120:10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hight SC, Cheng J (2005) Determination of total mercury in seafood by Cold Vapor-Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (CVAAS) after microwave decomposition. Food Chem 91:557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Roulet M, Lucotte M, Guimaraes JRD, Rheault I (2000) Methylmercury in water, seston, and epiphyton of an Amazonian river and its floodplain, Tapaj’os River, Brazil. Sci Total Environ 26:43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bennun L, Gomez J (1997) Determination of mercury by total-reflection X-ray fluorescence using amalgamation with gold. Spectrochim Acta B 52:1195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yu JC, Lo JM, Wai CM (1983) Extraction of gold and mercury from sea water with bismuth diethyldithiocarbamate prior to neutron activation-γ-spectrometry. Anal Chim Acta 154:307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Andreescu S, Marty JL (2006) Twenty years research in cholinesterase biosensors: from basic research to practical applications. Biomol Eng 23:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rahman MA, Won MS, Shim YB (2003) Characterization of an EDTA bonded conducting polymer modified electrode: its application for the simultaneous determination of heavy metal ions. Anal Chem 75:1123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ju H, Leech DJ (2000) Electrochemical study of a metallothionein modified gold disk electrode and its action on Hg2+ cations. J Electroanal Chem 484:150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Berchmans S, Arivukkodi S, Yegnaraman V (2000) Self-assembled monolayers of 2-mercaptobenzimidazole on gold: stripping voltammetric determination of Hg (II). Electrochem Commun 2:226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Viltchinskaia EA, Zeigmann LL, Morton SG (1995) Application of stripping voltammetry for the determination of mercury. Electroanalysis 7:264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Faller C, Stojko NU, Henze G, Brainina KHZ (1999) Determination of mercury traces using PDC/Au (III) modified electrodes. Anal Chim Acta 396:195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stillman MJ (1995) Metallothioneins. Coord Chem Rev 114:461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhao K, Song HY, Zhuang SQ, Dai LM, He PG, Fang YZ (2007) Determination of nitrite with the electrocatalytic property to the oxidation of nitrite on thionine modified aligned carbon nanotubes. Electrochem Commun 9:65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Li QW, Zhang J, Yan H, He MS, Liu ZF (2004) Thionine-mediated chemistry of carbon nanotubes. Carbon 42:2871Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gao Q, Cui XQ, Yang F, Ma Y, Yang XR (2003) Preparation of poly(thionine) modified screen-printed carbon electrode and its application to determine NADH in flow injection analysis system. Biosens Bioelectron 19:277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yang R, Ruan CM, Dai WL, Deng JQ, Kong JL (1999) Electropolymerization of thionine is neutral aqueous media and H2O2 biosensor based on poly(thionine). Electrochim Acta 44:1585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lacy Costello BPJ, Evans P, Ewen RJ, Honeybourne CL, Ratcliffe NM (1996) Novel composite organic–inorganic semiconductors sensors for the quantitative detection of targets organic vapors. J Mater Chem 6:289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Reitz JB, Solomon EI (1998) Propylene oxidation on copper oxide surfaces: electronic and geometric contributions to reactivity and selectivity. J Am Chem Soc 120:11467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Liu Z, Zhou R, Zheng X (2007) Comparative study of different methods of preparing CuO–CeO2 catalysts for preferential oxidation of CO in excess hydrogen. J Mol Catal A Chem 267:137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhuang Z, Su X, Yuan H, Sun Q, Xiao D, Choi MMF (2008) An improved sensitivity non-enzymatic glucose sensor based on a CuO nanowire modified Cu electrode. Analyst 133:126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Le WZ, Liu YQ (2009) Preparation of nano-copper oxide modified glassy carbon electrode by a novel film plating/potential cycling method and its characterization. Sens Actuators B 141:147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Chen D, Shen GZ, Tang KB, Qian YT (2003) Large-scale synthesis of CuO shuttle-like crystals via a convenient hydrothermal decomposition route. J Cryst Growth 254:225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bauldreay JM, Archer MD (1983) Dye-modified electrodes for photogalvanic cells. Electrochim Acta 28:1515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Engstrom RC (1982) Electrochemical pretreatment of glassy carbon electrodes. Anal Chem 54:2310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Moretto LM, Mazzocchin GA, Ugo P (1997) Electroanalytical study on the ion-exchange voltammetric behaviour of Hg (II) at Tosflex®-coated glassy carbon electrodes. J Electroanal Chem 427:113–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Vinod KG, Sudeshna C, Heinrich L (2005) A highly selective mercury electrode based on a diamine donor ligand. Talanta 66:575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kuralay F, Ozyoruk H, Yıldız A (2007) Inhibitive determination of Hg2+ ion by an amperometric urea biosensor using poly(vinylferrocenium) film. Enzyme Microb Technol 40:1156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mazloum M, Amini MK, Baltork IM (2000) Mercury selective membrane electrodes using 2-mercaptobenzimidazole, 2-mercaptobenzothiazole, and hexathiacyclooctadecane carriers. Sens Actuators B 63:80CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Anhui Key Laboratory of chemo-Biosening, College of Chemistry and Materials ScienceAnhui Normal UniversityWuhuPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations