Advertisement

FDEM Simulation of Rocks with Microstructure Generated by Voronoi Grain-Based Model with Particle Growth

  • Wei Zhou
  • Xiang Ji
  • Gang MaEmail author
  • Yuan Chen
Original Paper
  • 195 Downloads

Abstract

Rock strength variation is closely related to its microstructure. With the development of computer technology, the numerical model of rocks can be constructed via computer programming, and the numerical simulation avoids a mass of redundant experimental tests and usually limited by the samples retrieved from the sub-surfaces. In previous studies, the microstructure in the numerical model is generated randomly. In this paper, a novel methodology for generating the polycrystalline rock microstructure by a Voronoi grain-based model with particle growth is proposed. The 3D Voronoi tessellations in this numerical model generation procedure do not consist of random poly-crystals; the distribution of the poly-crystals varies in shapes and sizes, which represent different mineral grains, and is determined by petrographic data with the 3D particle growth method. The uniaxial compression tests and tension tests are simulated via a combined FDEM and cohesive crack propagation model. The results demonstrate that the numerical simulation agrees well with the experimental study. More importantly, the fracture patterns in the micro-scale are gained, similar to the results obtained from laboratory experiments. The novel Voronoi grain-based model with the particle growth method can reconstruct the microstructure of polycrystalline rocks and provide further information in understanding the micro-behaviors of rock materials.

Keywords

Grain-based model Particle growth FDEM Petrographic analysis 

Notes

Funding

This study was funded by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2017YFC0404801) and the National Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 51779194. The numerical calculations in this paper were performed on the supercomputing system in the Supercomputing Center of Wuhan University.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and manuscript is approved by all authors for publication. We would like to declare that the work described was original research that has not been published previously, and not under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part. All the authors listed have approved the manuscript that is enclosed.

References

  1. Aurenhammer F (1991) Voronoi diagrams—A survey of a fundamental data structure. ACM Comput Surv 23(3):345–405.  https://doi.org/10.1145/116873.116880 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blatt H, Tracy RJ (1996) Petrology. WH Freeman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Campbell CS (2006) Granular material flows—An overview. Powder Technol 162(3):208–229.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2005.12.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chang CS, Misra A, Xue JH (1989) Incremental stress-strain relationships for regular packings made of multi-sized particles. Int J Solids Struct 25(6):665–681.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7683(89)90032-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chang X, Hu C, Zhou W, Ma G, Zhang C (2014) A combined continuous-discontinuous approach for failure process of quasi-brittle materials. Sci China Technol Sci 57(3):550–559.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-014-5482-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cipriani Nicola (1996) The encyclopedia of rocks and minerals. Barnes & Noble, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Dreyer, W. (1972). The science of rock mechanics, part 1: the strength properties of rocks, vol 1, no. 2Google Scholar
  8. Erarslan N, Williams DJ (2012) Investigating the effect of cyclic loading on the indirect tensile strength of rocks. Rock Mech Rock Eng 45(3):327–340.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-011-0209-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fahy MP, Guccione MJ (1979) Estimating strength of sandstone using petrographic thin-section data. Environ Eng Geosci 16(4):467–485.  https://doi.org/10.2113/gseegeosci.xvi.4.467 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fairhurst CE, Hudson JA (1999) Draft ISRM suggested method for the complete stress-strain curve for intact rock in uniaxial compression. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 36(3):279–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Falconer K (2004) Fractal geometry: mathematical foundations and applications. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  12. Fang CH, Hao QI (2011) Study of intercrystalline facture stress intensity factor of rock in meso-scale. Rock Soil Mech 32(3):941–945.  https://doi.org/10.16285/j.rsm.2011.03.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fredrich JT, Evans B, Wong T-F (1990) Effect of grain size on brittle and semibrittle strength: implications for micromechanical modelling of failure in compression. J Geophys Res 95(B7):10907.  https://doi.org/10.1029/JB095iB07p10907 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ghazvinian E, Diederichs MS, Quey R (2014) 3D random Voronoi grain-based models for simulation of brittle rock damage and fabric-guided micro-fracturing. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 6(6):506–521.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2014.09.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Irfan TY (1996) Mineralogy, fabric properties and classification of weathered granites in Hong Kong. Q J Eng Geol Hydrogeol 29(1):5–35.  https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.QJEGH.1996.029.P1.02 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Irfan TY, Dearman WR (1978) The engineering petrography of a weathered granite in Cornwall, England. Q J Eng Geol Hydrogeol 11(3):233–244.  https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.QJEG.1978.011.03.03 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kazerani T, Zhao J (2010) Micromechanical parameters in bonded particle method for modelling of brittle material failure. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 32(18):1877–1895.  https://doi.org/10.1002/nag CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kovač M, Cizelj L (2005) Modeling elasto-plastic behavior of polycrystalline grain structure of steels at mesoscopic level. Nucl Eng Des 235(17–19):1939–1950.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2005.05.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lan H, Martin CD, Hu B (2010) Effect of heterogeneity of brittle rock on micromechanical extensile behavior during compression loading. J Geophys Res 115(B1):B01202.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JB006496 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Li J, Konietzky H, Frühwirt T (2017a) Voronoi-based DEM simulation approach for sandstone considering grain structure and pore size. Rock Mech Rock Eng 50(10):2749–2761.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-017-1257-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Li XF, Li HB, Zhao J (2017b) 3D polycrystalline discrete element method (3PDEM) for simulation of crack initiation and propagation in granular rock. Comput Geotech 90:96–112.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2017.05.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Luque A, Ruiz-Agudo E, Cultrone G, Sebastián E, Siegesmund S (2011) Direct observation of microcrack development in marble caused by thermal weathering. Environ Earth Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-010-0624-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ma G, Zhou C, Chang X, Wei Z (2011) Continuous-discontinuous coupling analysis for whole failure process of rock. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 30(12):2444–2455Google Scholar
  24. Ma G, Zhou W, Chang XL (2014) Modeling the particle breakage of rockfill materials with the cohesive crack model. Comput Geotech 61:132–143.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2014.05.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ma G, Zhou W, Ng TT, Cheng YG, Chang XL (2015) Microscopic modeling of the creep behavior of rockfills with a delayed particle breakage model. Acta Geotech 10(4):481–496.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-015-0367-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ma G, Zhou W, Chang X-L, Chen M-X (2016) A hybrid approach for modeling of breakable granular materials using combined finite-discrete element method. Granul Matter 18(1):7.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10035-016-0615-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ma G, Zhou W, Regueiro RA, Wang Q, Chang X (2017) Modeling the fragmentation of rock grains using computed tomography and combined FDEM. Powder Technol 308:388–397.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2016.11.046 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ma G, Zhou W, Zhang Y, Wang Q, Chang X (2018a) Fractal behavior and shape characteristics of fragments produced by the impact of quasi-brittle spheres. Powder Technol 325:498–509.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2017.11.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ma G, Zhang Y, Zhou W, Ng TT, Wang Q, Chen X (2018b) The effect of different fracture mechanisms on impact fragmentation of brittle heterogeneous solid. Int J Impact Eng 113:132–143.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.11.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mahabadi OK, Lisjak A, Munjiza A, Grasselli G (2012) Y-geo: new combined finite-discrete element numerical code for geomechanical applications. Int J Geomech 12(6):676–688.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000216 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mandelbrot BB (1982) The fractal geometry of nature, vol 1. WH Freeman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Mendes FM, Aires-Barros L, Rodrigues FP (1966) The use of modal analysis in the mechanical characterization of rock masses. In: 1st ISRM Congress. International Society for Rock Mechanics and Rock EngineeringGoogle Scholar
  33. Olsson WA (1974) Grain size dependence of yield stress in marble. J Geophys Res 79(32):4859–4862.  https://doi.org/10.1029/JB079i032p04859 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Onodera TF, Asoka Kumara HM (1980) Relation between texture and mechanical properties of crystalline rocks. Bull Int Assoc Eng Geol 22:173–177Google Scholar
  35. Paterson MS (1958) Experimental deformation and faulting in Wombeyan marble. Geol Soc Am Bull 69(4):465–476.  https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1958)69%5b465:edafiw%5d2.0.co;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Peng R, Ju Y, Wang JG, Xie H, Gao F, Mao L (2015) Energy dissipation and release during coal failure under conventional triaxial compression. Rock Mech Rock Eng 48(2):509–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Peng J, Wong LNY, Teh CI (2017) Influence of grain size heterogeneity on strength and microcracking behavior of crystalline rocks. J Geophys Res 122(2):1054–1073.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JB013469 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Peng J, Wong LNY, Teh CI, Li Z (2018) Modeling micro-cracking behavior of Bukit Timah granite using grain-based model. Rock Mech Rock Eng 51(1):135–154.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-017-1316-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Price NJ (2016) Fault and joint development: in brittle and semi-brittle rock. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  40. Přikryl R (2001) Some microstructural aspects of strength variation in rocks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 38(5):671–682.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1365-1609(01)00031-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rippa F, Vinale F (1983) Structure and mechanical behaviour of a volcanic tuff. In Proc of V Congress of ISRM Melbourne (pp. B33–B40)Google Scholar
  42. Robertson EC (1955) Experimental study of the strength of rocks. Geol Soc Am Bull 66(10):1275–1314.  https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1955)66%5b1275:esotso%5d2.0.co;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Willard RJ, Mcwilliams JR (1969) Microstructural techniques in the study of physical properties of rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr. 6(1):1 (IN1,3-2,IN2,12) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wong LNY, Maruvanchery V (2016) Different lithological varieties of bukit timah granite in singapore: a preliminary comparison study on engineering properties. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49(7):2923–2935.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-015-0825-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Yao S-F, Zhang Z-N, Ge X-R, Qiu Y-P, Xu J-M (2016) Correlation between fracture energy and geometrical characteristic of mesostructure of marble. Yantu Lixue/Rock Soil Mech 37(8):2341–2346.  https://doi.org/10.16285/j.rsm.2016.08.028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Yilmaz GN, Mete Goktan R, Kibici Y (2011) Relations between some quantitative petrographic characteristics and mechanical strength properties of granitic building stones. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 48(3):506–513.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2010.09.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zhao XG, Cai M, Wang J, Ma LK (2013) Damage stress and acoustic emission characteristics of the beishan granite. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 64(12):258–269.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2013.09.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zhou W, Yuan W, Ma G, Chang XL (2016) Combined finite-discrete element method modeling of rockslides. Eng Comput 33(5):1530–1559.  https://doi.org/10.1108/EC-04-2015-0082 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering ScienceWuhan UniversityWuhanChina
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Rock Mechanics in Hydraulic Structural Engineering of Ministry of EducationWuhan UniversityWuhanChina

Personalised recommendations