Advertisement

Simplified Consideration for Permanent Rock Dowels in Block Theory and 2-D Limit Equilibrium Analyses

  • F. TononEmail author
Technical Note
  • 61 Downloads

Introduction

This technical note presents a simplified way to take into account the stabilizing effects of untensioned steel bars fully grouted in rock within block theory and 2-D limit equilibrium analyses of rock blocks. These rock-reinforcing elements are also known as rock dowels (United States), continuously mechanically coupled (CMC) rockbolts, fully grouted rockbolts, fully bonded rock bolts, passive anchors, passive bolts, and untensioned grouted rock bolts: the term dowel will be used here. The literature on this topic is quite extensive, and the reader is referred to e.g., Liu and Li (2017).

The analytical procedure presented in this note may be considered as a simplified version of the yield design method proposed and analyzed by several authors, e.g., Panet (1987) and Ribacchi et al. (1995). In this version, only one yielding mechanism is considered, i.e., the yielding of the dowel at the intersection point with the rock fracture. Therefore, the yield strength of the...

Keywords

Fully grouted bolts Rock dowels Passive anchors Block theory Limit equilibrium analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Equation (9) appeared in a paper by Ribacchi et al. (1995); the conference paper, in Italian, is mostly unknown to the international literature. The author is grateful to Dr. Y. Z. Li (University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China) for providing him with the numerical values for their experimental results and formulation results in Fig. 2. The author is also thankful to the two anonymous reviewers whose comments greatly contributed to the final version of the manuscript.

References

  1. Bidaut P, Durville J-L, Guillemin P, Richard J-C, Viktorovitch M (2006) Essais de cisaillement sur discontinuités armées par ancrages passifs: utilisation d’une boîte de cisaillement de grandes dimensions. BLPC 263–264:7–18Google Scholar
  2. Blondeau F, Christiansen M, Guilloux A, Schlosser F (1984) TaIren: Méthode de calcul des ouvrages en terre renforcée. In: Proc. Int. Symp. In Situ Soil and Rock Reinforcement, Paris, France, pp 219–224Google Scholar
  3. Chen Y (2014) Experimental study and stress analysis of rock bolt anchorage performance. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 6:428–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Goodman RE (1989) Introduction to rock mechanics, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Goodman RE, Shi GH (1985) Block theory and its application to rock engineering. Prentice-Hall International, London, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  6. Grasselli G (2005) 3D Behavior of bolted rock joints: experimental and numerical study. Int J Rock Mech Mining Sci 42:13–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Liu CH, Li YZ (2017) Analytical study of the mechanical behavior of fully grouted bolts in bedding rock slopes. Rock Mech Rock Eng 50:2413–2423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Maiolino S, Pellet F (2015) Full scale lab testing for the determination of rock bolt contribution to reinforced joint shear strength. In: ISRM 2015—Intl Symposium on Rock Mechanics, Montreal, pp 1–8Google Scholar
  9. Maiolino S, Pellet F (2018) Dimensionnement du boulonnage à la limite élastique: confrontation des formules analytiques avec les essais à l’échelle un. Journées In Nationales de Géotechnique et de Géologie de l’Ingénieur—Champs-sur-Marne 2018.Google Scholar
  10. Mauldon M, Goodman RE (1996) Vector analysis of keyblock rotations. ASCE J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 122(12):976–987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Panet M (1987) Reinforcement of rock foundations and slopes by active or passive anchors. In: Proc. 6th Cong. Int. Soc. Rock Mech. Montreal, vol 3, pp 1411–1420. A. A. Balkema, RotterdamGoogle Scholar
  12. Pellet F, Egger P (1996) Analytical model for the mechanical behavior of bolted rock joints subjected to shearing. Rock Mech Rock Eng 29:73–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ribacchi R, Graziani A, Lembo-Fazio A (1995) Analisi del comportamento dei sistemi di rinforzo passivi in roccia. In: XIX Convegno Nazionale di Geotecnica, vol 2, pp 239–268 Pavia, Italy, 19–21 Sept. 1995. SGE Editoriali, PadovaGoogle Scholar
  14. Richard JC (1997) Caractéristiques de fonctionnement des ancrages passifs. Campagne d’essais 1997, internal research report, pp 63, LRPC de Lyon, FranceGoogle Scholar
  15. Spang K (1988) Beitrag zur rechnerischen Berücksichtung vollvermörtelter Anker bei der Sicherung von Felsbauwerken in geschichtetem oder geklüftetem Gebirge. Thèse de doctorat No 740, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  16. Tonon F (1998) Generalization of Mauldon’s and Goodman’s vector analysis of keyblock rotations. ASCE J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 124(10):913–922CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Tonon USAAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations