Advertisement

Shear Behavior of Unfilled-Planar Quartzitic Rock Joints with Reference to Weathering Grade of Joint Surfaces

  • B. K. Ram
  • A. BasuEmail author
Technical Note
  • 205 Downloads

Introduction

Shear strength of rock discontinuities (e.g., joints, bedding planes, shear planes, faults, etc.) plays a crucial role in controlling the rock mass behavior particularly at shallow depth where chances of intact rock failure are minimal because of low stresses (Hoek 2007). A number of researchers investigated the influence of various factors like joint roughness coefficient (JRC), joint compressive strength (JCS), magnitude of normal stress, stiffness of surrounding rock mass, rate of shearing, nature and thickness of infilling material, and degree of saturation on shear behavior of rock discontinuities (e.g., Barton and Choubey 1977; Kulatilake et al. 1995; Grasselli and Egger 2003; Hencher and Richards 2015; Singh and Basu 2016, 2018; Tang and Wong 2016; etc.).

The ongoing process of weathering in nature, which is slow yet complex, alters rocks and hence the discontinuity surfaces at shallow depth where most engineering works are confined (Basu et al. 2009). Although it...

Keywords

Quartzite Natural joints Weathering grade Joint roughness coefficient Shear behavior 

Abbreviations

JRC

Joint roughness coefficient

JCS

Joint wall compressive strength (MPa)

σn

Normal stress (MPa)

τP

Peak shear strength (MPa)

P

Peak friction angle (o)

Z2

Root mean square of first derivative of the joint profiles

L

Length of joint profile (mm)

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to Prof. Giovanni Barla for his suggestions that helped improve the readability of the article. B. K. Ram acknowledges research fellowship from UGC, Government of India. The authors acknowledge the overall support by IIT Kharagpur for carrying out this investigation.

References

  1. ANON (1995) The description and classification of weathered rocks for engineering purposes: Geological Society Engineering Group Working Party Report. Q J Eng Geol 28:207–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barton N, Choubey V (1977) The shear strength of rock joints in theory and practice. Rock Mech 10:1–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Basu A, Celestino TB, Bortolucci AA (2009) Evaluation of rock mechanical behaviors under uniaxial compression with reference to assessed weathering grades. Rock Mech Rock Eng 42:73–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Basu A, Ghosh N, Das M (2012) Categorizing weathering grades of quartzitic materials and assessing Brazilian tensile strength with reference to assigned grades. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 49:148–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Deere DU, Miller RP (1966) Engineering classification and index properties for intact rock. Technical Report No. AFWL-TR-65-116. Air Force Weapons Laboratory, New MexicoGoogle Scholar
  6. Grasselli G, Egger P (2003) Constitutive law for the shear strength of rock joints based on three-dimensional surface parameters. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 40:25–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hencher SR, Richards LR (2015) Assessing the shear strength of rock discontinuities at laboratory and field scales. Rock Mech Rock Eng 48:883–905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hoek E (2007) Practical rock engineering. e-bookGoogle Scholar
  9. ISRM (2014) The ISRM suggested methods for rock characterization, testing and monitoring: 2007–2014. In: Ulusay R (ed) Suggested methods prepared by the commission on testing methods International Society for Rock Mechanics. Springer, Cham, p 293Google Scholar
  10. Kulatilake PHSW, Shou G, Huang TH, Morgan RM (1995) New peak shear strength criteria for anisotropic rock joints. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 32(7):673–697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Li Y, Zhang Y (2015) Quantitative estimation of joints roughness coefficient using statistical parameters. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 77:27–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Myers NO (1962) Characterization of surface roughness. Wear 5:182–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Özvan A, Dinçer I, Acar A, Özvan B (2014) The effects of discontinuity surface roughness on the shear strength of weathered granite joints. Bull Eng Geol Environ 73:801–813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Saha AK (1994) Crustal evolution of Singhbhum North Orissa, Eastern India. Geol Soc Ind Mem 27:341Google Scholar
  15. Singh HK, Basu A (2016) Shear behaviors of ‘real’ natural un-matching joints of granite with equivalent joint roughness coefficients. Eng Geol 211:120–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Singh HK, Basu A (2018) A comparison between the shear behavior of ‘real’ natural rock discontinuities and their replicas. Rock Mech Rock Eng 51:329–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Tang ZC, Wong LNY (2016) New criterion for evaluating the peak shear strength of rock joints under different contact states. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49:1191–1199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Woo I, Fleurisson J-A, Park H-J (2010) Influence of weathering on shear strength of joints in a porphyritic granite rock mass in Jechon area, South Korea. Geosci J 14(3):289–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Geology and GeophysicsIndian Institute of Technology KharagpurKharagpurIndia

Personalised recommendations