Updates to Grasselli’s Peak Shear Strength Model

  • Yongchao Tian
  • Quansheng Liu
  • Dongfeng Liu
  • Yongshui Kang
  • Penghai Deng
  • Fan He
Original Paper
  • 118 Downloads

Abstract

The morphological characteristics of rock joints have a significant impact on the peak shear strength of a rock mass. In this study, three-dimensional scanning tests have been conducted on 39 joint specimens. Based on the scanning data, the morphological parameter \( C^\prime \) has been developed to describe the joint roughness. With an explicit physical meaning, this index is negatively correlated with the joint roughness and can reflect the anisotropy of surface morphology. Using a newly developed derivation method, the morphological parameter \( C^\prime \) of each joint from the earlier studies has been determined. The scanning test results in this study have been used to confirm the feasibility of this new derivation method. By applying the least square fitting method to the Grasselli’s (Shear strength of rock joints based on quantified surface description. Dissertation, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, 2001) test results, a new peak shear strength model has been developed. Finally, a comparison of the peak shear strength of rock joint predicted by the new model and other classic models shows that the new model, characterized by simplicity, relatively higher precision, and a definite physical meaning, is feasible to predict the peak shear strength of rock joints.

Keywords

Joint roughness Morphological characteristics Peak shear strength 

List of symbols

\( \tau_{\text{p}} \)

Peak shear strength (MPa)

\( \sigma_{\text{t}} \)

Tensile strength (MPa)

\( \sigma_{\text{c}} \)

Uniaxial compressive strength (MPa)

\( \varphi_{\text{b}} \)

Basic friction angle (°)

\( \sigma_{\text{n}} \)

Normal stress (MPa)

\( i_{\text{p}} \)

Peak dilatancy angle (°)

\( i_{0} \)

Initial dilatancy angle (°)

n

Outward normal vector of the triangle unit

n1

The projection vector of n

n0

Outward normal vector of the shear plane

S

The shear vector

\( \alpha \)

The angle between n 1 and S (°)

\( \theta \)

Dip angle of the triangle unit (°)

Atotal

Total area (mm2)

Acontact

The potential contact area (mm2)

\( A_{{\theta^{ * } }} \)

Contact area ratio

\( A_{0} \)

Maximum contact area ratio

\( \theta^{ * } \)

Apparent dip angle (°)

\( \theta_{\text{cr}}^{ * } \)

Critical apparent dip angle

\( \theta_{\rm{max} }^{ * } \)

Maximum apparent dip angle (°)

C

Distribution parameter defined by Grasselli (2001)

\( C^{\prime} \)

Newly defined distribution parameter

\( \delta \)

Relative error

JRC

Joint roughness coefficient

JMC

Joint matching coefficient

JCS

Joint wall compressive strength (MPa)

\( \beta \)

Angle between schistosity plane and plane normal to the joint (°)

\( y_{\text{calculated}} \)

Calculated results

\( y_{\text{measured}} \)

Measured results

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the support of the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) (Grant No. 2014CB046904) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51774267).

References

  1. Asadi MS, Rasouli V, Barla G (2013) A laboratory shear cell used for simulation of shear strength and asperity degradation of rough rock fractures. Rock Mech Rock Eng 46:683–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barton N, Choubey V (1977) The shear strength of rock joints in theory and practice. Rock Mech Rock Eng 10:1–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Belem T, Homand-Etienne F, Souley M (2000) Quantitative parameters for rock joint surface roughness. Rock Mech Rock Eng 33:217–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Belem T, Souley M, Homand F (2009) Method for quantification of wear of sheared joint walls based on surface morphology. Rock Mech Rock Eng 42:883–910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fishman YA (1990) Failure mechanism and shear strength of joint wall asperities. In: Stephansson O, Barton N (eds) Rock joints. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 627–631Google Scholar
  6. Ghazvinian AH, Taghichian A, Hashemi M, Mar’Ashi SA (2010) The shear behavior of bedding planes of weakness between two different rock types with high strength difference. Rock Mech Rock Eng 43:69–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ghazvinian AH, Azinfar MJ, Vaneghi RG (2012) Importance of tensile strength on the shear behavior of discontinuities. Rock Mech Rock Eng 45:349–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Grasselli G (2001) Shear strength of rock joints based on quantified surface description. Dissertation, Swiss Federal Institute of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  9. Jang HS, Kang SS, Jang BA (2014) Determination of joint roughness coefficients using roughness parameters. Rock Mech Rock Eng 47:2061–2073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ladanyi B, Archambault G (1969) Simulation of shear behavior of a jointed rock mass. US Symp Rock Mech 20:2359–2365Google Scholar
  11. Liu QS, Tian YC, Liu DF, Jiang YL (2017) Updates to JRC–JCS model for estimating the peak shear strength of rock joints based on quantified surface description. Eng Geol.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.08.020 Google Scholar
  12. Maerz NH, Franklin JA, Bennett CP (1990) Joint roughness measurement using shadow profilometry. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 27:329–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Park JW, Song JJ (2009) Numerical simulation of a direct shear test on a rock joint using a bonded-particle model. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 46:1315–1328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Patton FD (1966) Multiple modes of shear failure in rock. In: Proceeding of the congress of international society of rock mechanics, pp 509–513Google Scholar
  15. Tang H, Ge Y, Wang L, Yuan Y, Huang L, Sun M (2012) Study on estimation method of rock mass discontinuity shear strength based on three-dimensional laser scanning and image technique. J Earth Sci 23:908–913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Tatone BS (2009) Quantitative characterization of natural rock discontinuity roughness in situ and in the laboratory. Dissertation, University of TorontoGoogle Scholar
  17. Tatone BS, Grasselli G (2009) A method to evaluate the three-dimensional roughness of fracture surfaces in brittle geomaterials. Rev Sci Instrum 80:125110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Tse R, Cruden DM (1979) Estimating joint roughness coefficients. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 16:303–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Xia CC, Tang ZC, Xiao WM, Song YL (2014) New peak shear strength criterion of rock joints based on quantified surface description. Rock Mech Rock Eng 47:387–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Yang ZY, Taghichian A, Huang GD (2011) On the applicability of self-affinity concept in scale of three-dimensional rock joints. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 48:1173–1187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Yang J, Rong G, Cheng L, Hou D, Wang X (2015) Experimental study of peak shear strength of rock joints. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 34:3Google Scholar
  22. Yang J, Rong G, Hou D, Peng J, Zhou C (2016) Experimental study on peak shear strength criterion for rock joints. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49:821–835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Yu X, Vayssade B (1991) Joint profiles and their roughness parameters. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 28:333–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Zhang X, Jiang Q, Chen N, Wei W, Feng X (2016) Laboratory investigation on shear behavior of rock joints and a new peak shear strength criterion. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49:3495–3512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Zhao J (1997) Joint surface matching and shear strength part B: JRC-JMC shear strength criterion. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 34:179–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yongchao Tian
    • 1
  • Quansheng Liu
    • 1
  • Dongfeng Liu
    • 1
  • Yongshui Kang
    • 2
  • Penghai Deng
    • 1
  • Fan He
    • 1
  1. 1.The Key Laboratory of Safety for Geotechnical and Structural Engineering of Hubei Province, School of Civil EngineeringWuhan UniversityWuhanChina
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil MechanicsChinese Academy of SciencesWuhanChina

Personalised recommendations