Advertisement

Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering

, Volume 50, Issue 12, pp 3307–3322 | Cite as

The Q-Slope Method for Rock Slope Engineering

  • Neil Bar
  • Nick Barton
Original Paper

Abstract

Q-slope is an empirical rock slope engineering method for assessing the stability of excavated rock slopes in the field. Intended for use in reinforcement-free road or railway cuttings or in opencast mines, Q-slope allows geotechnical engineers to make potential adjustments to slope angles as rock mass conditions become apparent during construction. Through case studies across Asia, Australia, Central America, and Europe, a simple correlation between Q-slope and long-term stable slopes was established. Q-slope is designed such that it suggests stable, maintenance-free bench-face slope angles of, for instance, 40°–45°, 60°–65°, and 80°–85° with respective Q-slope values of approximately 0.1, 1.0, and 10. Q-slope was developed by supplementing the Q-system which has been extensively used for characterizing rock exposures, drill-core, and tunnels under construction for the last 40 years. The Q′ parameters (RQD, J n, J a, and J r) remain unchanged in Q-slope. However, a new method for applying J r/J a ratios to both sides of potential wedges is used, with relative orientation weightings for each side. The term J w, which is now termed J wice, takes into account long-term exposure to various climatic and environmental conditions such as intense erosive rainfall and ice-wedging effects. Slope-relevant SRF categories for slope surface conditions, stress-strength ratios, and major discontinuities such as faults, weakness zones, or joint swarms have also been incorporated. This paper discusses the applicability of the Q-slope method to slopes ranging from less than 5 m to more than 250 m in height in both civil and mining engineering projects.

Keywords

Q-slope Rock slope engineering Slope stability Rock mass classification Empirical method 

List of symbols

RQD

Rock quality designation

Jn

Joint sets number

Jr

Joint roughness number

Ja

Joint alteration number

Jwice

Environmental and geological condition number

SRFslope

Three strength reduction factors a, b, and c

SRFa

Physical condition number

SRFb

Stress and strength number

SRFc

Major discontinuity number

O-factor

Orientation factor for the ratio J r/J a

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors sincerely thank Cameron Ryan (Australia), Simon Thomas (Papua New Guinea), and Luis Jorda-Bordehore (Spain) for their case study contributions.

References

  1. Bar N, Barton N (2016) Empirical slope design for hard and soft rocks using Q-slope. In: Proceedings of the 50th US rock mechanics/geomechanics symposium, ARMA 2016, Houston, 26–29 June 2016. ARMA16-384Google Scholar
  2. Bar N, Barton N, Ryan CA (2016) Application of the Q-slope method to highly weathered and saprolitic rocks in Far North Queensland. In: Ulusay R et al (eds) Rock mechanics and rock engineering: from the past to the future; Proceedings of the ISRM international symposium, Eurock 2016, Cappadocia, 29–31 August 2016, pp 585–590Google Scholar
  3. Barton N (1973) Review of a new shear-strength criterion for rock joints. Eng Geol 7(4):287–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barton N, Bar N (2015) Introducing the Q-slope method and its intended use within civil and mining engineering projects. In: Schubert W, Kluckner A (eds) Future development of rock mechanics; Proceedings of the ISRM regional symposium, Eurock 2015 and 64th geomechanics colloquium, Salzburg, 7–10 October 2015, pp 157–162Google Scholar
  5. Barton N, Grimstad E (2014) Forty years with the Q-system in Norway and abroad, vol 4.1–4.25. Fjellsprengningsteknikk, Bergmekanikk, Geoteknikk, NFF, OsloGoogle Scholar
  6. Barton N, Quadros E (2015) Anisotropy is everywhere, to see, to measure and to model. Rock Mech Rock Eng 48:1323–1339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barton N, Lien R, Lunde J (1974) Engineering classification of rock masses for the design of tunnel support. Rock Mech 6:189–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barton N, Bandis S, Bakhtar K (1985) Strength, deformation and conductivity coupling of rock joints. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 22(3):121–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bieniawski ZT (1976) Rock mass classification in rock engineering. In: Bieniawski ZT (ed) Exploration for rock engineering; Proceedings of the symposium, Cape Town, Balkema, pp 97–106Google Scholar
  10. Bieniawski ZT (1989) Engineering rock mass classifications: a complete manual for engineers and geologists in mining, civil, and petroleum engineering. Wiley, New York, p 272pGoogle Scholar
  11. Deere DU (1963) Technical description of rock cores for engineering purposes. Felsmechanik und Ingenieurgeologie (Rock Mech Eng Geol) 1:16–22Google Scholar
  12. Deere DU, Hendron AJ, Patton F, Cording EJ (1967) Design of surface and near surface excavations in rock. In: Fairhust C (ed) Proceedings of the 8th U.S. symposium on rock mechanics: failure and breakage of rock, AIME, New York, pp 237–302Google Scholar
  13. Hutchinson DJ, Diederichs MS (1996) Cable bolting in underground mines. Bitech, VancouverGoogle Scholar
  14. Laubscher DH (1977) Geomechanics classification of jointed rock masses—mining applications. Trans Inst Min Met Sect A Min Ind 93:A1–A8Google Scholar
  15. Laubscher DH, Jakubec J (2001) The MRMR rock mass classification for jointed rock masses. In: Hustrulid A, Bullock C (eds) Underground mining methods: engineering fundamentals and international case studies, New York, AIME, pp 474–481Google Scholar
  16. Romana M (1985) New adjustment ratings for application of Bieniawski classification to slopes. In: Proceedings of the ISRM international symposium on role of rock mechanics in excavations for mining and civil works, Zacatecas, pp 49–53Google Scholar
  17. Romana M (1995) The geomechanical classification SMR for slope correction. In: Proceedings of the 8th ISRM congress on rock mechanics, vol 3, Tokyo, 25–29 September 1995, pp 1085–1092Google Scholar
  18. Sullivan TD (2013) Global slope performance index. In Dight PM (ed) Proceedings of slope stability 2013, Brisbane, 25–27 September 2013, pp 55–80Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Gecko Geotechnics Pty LtdMt SheridanAustralia
  2. 2.Nick Barton & AssociatesOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations