Comparison of Visual and Acoustic Emission Observations in a Four Point Bending Experiment on Barre Granite
- 818 Downloads
We present an experimental study in which a pre-notched specimen of Barre Granite was subjected to four point bending under crack mouth opening displacement control. The experimental observations consisted of load–displacement measurements, acoustic emissions, and photography on a macroscopic (~cm) as well as microscopic (~μm) scale. These observations were compared and analysed to better understand process zone development and crack propagation. Load–displacement data showed that the load reaches its maximum at crack initiation, and the machine input work is constant while the crack propagates. AE moment magnitudes between Mw = −6 to −10 were observed, and focal mechanisms consisted of both shear and tensile components. During process zone development, AE formed a large cloud of events located near the notch tip and then tended to occur away from the notch tip as the crack propagated. Image analysis at the microscopic scale showed that microcracks formed and coalesced during process zone development; specifically, the microcracks initiated in tension and then propagated as a series of en-echelon cracks. In general, the synthesis of the three observations showed that a wider bulb of activity at lower energy tended to occur during process zone development, while crack propagation tended to be more spatially concentrated and contained higher energy.
KeywordsAcoustic emissions (AE) Digital image correlation (DIC) Rock fracture
The research presented in this paper was supported by TOTAL SA. The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude for this support. We would also like to thank Professors Brian Evans, John Germaine and German Prieto, and Dr. Ulrich Mok for the insights and suggestions.
- ASTM C1161 (2013) Standard test method for flexural strength of advanced ceramics at ambient temperature. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), West Conshohocken, United StatesGoogle Scholar
- Goncalves da Silva BM (2016) Fracturing processes and induced seismicity due to the hydraulic fracturing of rocks. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
- Gutenberg B, Richter C (1954) Seismicity of the Earth, 2nd edn. Princeton Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
- Maeda N (1985) A method for reading and checking phase times in autoprocessing system of seismic wave data. J Seismol Soc Japan 38:365–379Google Scholar
- Olson JE (2004) Predicting fracture swarms—the influence of subcritical crack growth and the crack-tip process zone on joint spacing in rock. Geological Society, London, pp 73–88 (Special Publications) Google Scholar
- Pais JC, Harvey JT (2012) Four point bending. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
- Vermylen J, Zoback MD (2011) Hydraulic fracturing, microseismic magnitudes, and stress evolution in the barnett shale. In: SPE Hydraulic fracturing technology conference, The Woodlands, Texas, USAGoogle Scholar
- Viegas G, Urbancic T, Baig A, von Lunen E (2015) Rupture dynamics and source scaling relations of microseismic hydraulic fractures in shale reservoirs. In: Proceedings of the 13th international ISRM congress 2015Google Scholar