Advertisement

Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering

, Volume 48, Issue 6, pp 2485–2488 | Cite as

Back Analysis of Grout Treatment at Sumbar Dam Using the Joint Hydraulic Factor

  • H. R. Rostami Barani
  • M. M. Khatib
Technical Note

Introduction

Grouting is a common method of sealing rock and repairing concrete structures (Turkmen 2003; Butron et al. 2010; Hoien and Nilson 2013; Lim et al. 2013; Bras et al. 2013), and there are many examples of its application to the engineering of dam foundation improvement (Rafi 2010; Saeidi et al. 2013; Rostami Barani et al. 2014). Determining a need for grouting is a main concern in dam foundation improvement (Deere 1982; Ewert 1985). A useful design tool for ground treatment must be able to predict both zones of low water take and low grout take. Our approach is to use the degree of water-bearing structures of the rock fracture to produce reliable zoning map of the dam foundations. For this purpose, the database of the grouting works at Sumbar dam was analyzed. The main objective is to produce a criterion to be used during grouting and capable of a reasonable estimation of the expected sealing through various ground conditions. A systemic statistical analysis to assess the...

Keywords

Water pressure test Fracture distribution Joint hydraulic factor Cement grouting 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I would like to express my sincere thanks to Prof Giovanni Barla (Editor) for his great help, and to the reviewers for their beneficial suggestions and comments to improve this paper. The author also wishes to thank many engineers, geologists and technical staff of T-Mahar Ab Engineering Company (T-MAECO) for facilitating access to the dam data.

References

  1. Bras A, Gião R, Lúcio V, Chastre C (2013) Development of an injectable grout for concrete repair and strengthening. Cem Concr Comp 37:185–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Butron C, Gustafson G, Fransson A, Funehag J (2010) Drip sealing of tunnels in hard rock: a new concept for the design and evaluation of permeation grouting. Tunn Undergr Sp Tech 25(2):114–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Deere DU (1982) Cement-bentonite grouting for dams. American Society of Civil Engineers, Geotechnical Engineering Specialty Conference on Grouting, New Orleans, February 10–12, pp 279–300Google Scholar
  4. Eklund D, Stille H (2008) Penetrability due to filtration tendency of cement-based grouts. Tunn Undergr Sp Tech 23(4):389–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. El Tani M (2012) Grouting Rock Fractures with Cement Grout. Rock Mech Rock Eng 45(4):547–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ewert FK (1985) Rock grouting with emphasis on dam sites, Springer-verlag, Berlin, New York, 428 pGoogle Scholar
  7. Hoien AH, Nilson B (2013) Rock mass grouting in the Løren tunnel: case study with the main focus on the groutability and feasibility of drill parameter interpretation. Rock Mech Rock Eng 47(3):967–983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lim SK, Tan CS, Chen KP, Lee ML, Lee WP (2013) Effect of different sand grading on strength properties of cement grout. Constr Build Mater 38:348–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. PTCI.186 (2000) Guideline for grouting in hydro-structures. Letter no. 186. Publications and technical criteria Iran (PTCI), Plan and Budget Organization-Ministry of Energy. Tehran, Iran, in Persian. Available on the mporg website. http://tec.mporg.ir/. Accessed 25 Sept 2012
  10. Rafi JY (2010) Applying "real time grouting control method" in sedimentary rock with gotvand dam data. Master of Science thesis, Division of Soil and Rock Mechanics, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  11. Rostami Barani HR, Lashkaripour GL, Ghafoori M (2014) Predictive permeability model of faults in crystalline rocks; verification by Joint Hydraulic factor (JH) obtained from water pressure tests. J Earth Syst Sci 123(6):1325–1334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Saeidi O, Stille H, Torabi SR (2013) Numerical and analytical analyses of the effects of different joint and grout properties on the rock mass groutability. Tunn Undergr Sp Tech 38:11–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. T-Mahar Ab Engineering Company (T-MAECO) (2011) Engineering geology report of Sumbar dam site; Sumbar Project, vol. 2. Ministry of Energy. Mashhad, Iran, in PersianGoogle Scholar
  14. T-Mahar Ab Engineering Company (T-MAECO) (2012) Method statement for drilling and grouting works report of Sumbar dam site; Sumbar Project, vol. 9. Ministry of Energy. Mashhad, Iran, in PersianGoogle Scholar
  15. Turkmen S (2003) Treatment of the seepage problems at the Kalecik Dam (Turkey). Eng Geol 68(3–4):159–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Geology, Faculty of ScienceThe University of BirjandBirjandIran

Personalised recommendations