Reply to Discussion by Li and Wong on “Predicting the Uniaxial Compressive and Tensile Strengths of Gypsum Rock by Point Load Testing” by Heidari et al., Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering (2012) 45:265–273
- 352 Downloads
Specimen and Sample
It is clearly stated in the paper that 40 block samples from gypsum rock were collected and cored. Then 90 cores (perpendicular to stratification) and irregular specimens were prepared from gypsum rock for point load tests (PLT) (for different types of PLT in both air-dried and saturated states). Also 60 cores were prepared for UCS and Brazilian tests (in air-dried and saturated states). 15 specimens (in the paper, “specimen” and “sample” have the same meaning) were numbered randomly from G 1 to G 15 for each test. It seems that Li and Wong assumed the number presented in each row of Tables 1 and 2 to have been obtained from the same rock block. In other words, different core samples were prepared from different blocks of gypsum rock.
KeywordsConversion Factor Uniaxial Compressive Strength Rock Specimen Weak Rock Brazilian Test
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
The authors gratefully acknowledge the discussers for their interest in the paper and their effort to provide the community with detailed and constructive comments.
- Bowden AJ, Lamont-Black J, Ullyott S (1998) Point load testing of weak rocks with particular reference to chalk. Q J Eng Geol 31:95–103Google Scholar
- Chau KT, Wong RHC (1996) Uniaxial compressive strength and point load strength. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 33:183–188Google Scholar
- D’Andrea DV, Fisher RL, DE Fogelson (1964) Prediction of compression strength from other rock properties. Colo Sch Mines Q 59(4B):623–640Google Scholar
- Deere DU, Miller RP (1966) Engineering classification and index properties for intact rock. Air Force Weapons Lab. Technical report, AFWL-TR 65–116, Kirtland Base, New MexicoGoogle Scholar
- Grasso P, Xu S, Mahtab A (1992) Problems and promises of index testing of rocks. In: Tillerson JR, Wawersik WR (eds) Proceedings of the 33rd US symposium on rock mechanics. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 879–888Google Scholar
- Gunsallus KL, Kulhawy FH (1984) A comparative evaluation of rock strength measures. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 21:233–248Google Scholar
- Hassani FP, Scoble MJ, Whittaker BN (1980) Application of point load index test to strength determination of rock and proposals for new size-correction chart. In: Summers DA (ed) Proceedings of the 21st US symposium on rock mechanics. University of Missouri Press, Rolla, pp 543–564Google Scholar
- Mark C, Molinda GM (1996) Rating coal mine roof strength from exploratory drill core. In: the Proceeding of the 15th International Conference on Ground Control in Mining, Golden CO, pp 415–428Google Scholar
- Rusnak J, Mark C (2000) Using the point load test to determine the uniaxial compressive strength of coal measure rock. In: Peng SS, Mark C (eds) Proceedings of the 19th international conference on ground control in mining. West Virginia University, Morgantown, pp 362–371Google Scholar
- Sabatakakis N, Koukis G, Tsiambaos G, Papanakli S (2009) Index properties and strength variation controlled by microstructure for sedimentary rocks. Eng Geol 97:80–90Google Scholar
- Singh DP (1981) Determination of some engineering properties of weak rocks. In: Akai K (ed) Proceedings of the international symposium on weak rock. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 21–24Google Scholar
- Torabi-Kaveh M (2011) Study of evaporative rocks solubility in Gachsaran formation in the Chamshir Dam Site. M.Sc Thesis, Faculty of Sciences, Bu-Ali Sina University, HamedanGoogle Scholar
- Tsiambaos G, Sabatakakis N (2004) Considerations on strength of intact sedimentary rocks. Eng Geol 72:261–273Google Scholar
© Springer-Verlag 2012