Advertisement

Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering

, Volume 45, Issue 6, pp 1131–1135 | Cite as

Reply to Discussion by Li and Wong on “Predicting the Uniaxial Compressive and Tensile Strengths of Gypsum Rock by Point Load Testing” by Heidari et al., Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering (2012) 45:265–273

  • M. HeidariEmail author
  • G. R. Khanlari
  • M. Torabi-Kaveh
Reply
  • 352 Downloads

Specimen and Sample

It is clearly stated in the paper that 40 block samples from gypsum rock were collected and cored. Then 90 cores (perpendicular to stratification) and irregular specimens were prepared from gypsum rock for point load tests (PLT) (for different types of PLT in both air-dried and saturated states). Also 60 cores were prepared for UCS and Brazilian tests (in air-dried and saturated states). 15 specimens (in the paper, “specimen” and “sample” have the same meaning) were numbered randomly from G 1 to G 15 for each test. It seems that Li and Wong assumed the number presented in each row of Tables  1 and 2 to have been obtained from the same rock block. In other words, different core samples were prepared from different blocks of gypsum rock.
Table 1

Equations correlating the UCS to the point load index Is(50)

Reference

Correlating equations

D’Andrea et al. (1964)

UCS = 15.3 Is(50) + 16.3

Deere and Miller (1966)

UCS = 20.7 Is(50) + 29.6

Singh (1981)

UCS = 18.7 Is(50) − 13.2

Gu...

Keywords

Conversion Factor Uniaxial Compressive Strength Rock Specimen Weak Rock Brazilian Test 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the discussers for their interest in the paper and their effort to provide the community with detailed and constructive comments.

References

  1. Bieniawski ZT (1975) Point load test in geotechnical practice. Eng Geol 9(1):1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bowden AJ, Lamont-Black J, Ullyott S (1998) Point load testing of weak rocks with particular reference to chalk. Q J Eng Geol 31:95–103Google Scholar
  3. Broch E, Franklin JA (1972) The point-load strength test. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 9(6):669–676. doi: 10.1016/0148-9062(72)90030-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cargill JS, Shakoor A (1990) Evaluation of empirical methods for measuring the uniaxial compressive strength of rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 27(6):495–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chau KT, Wong RHC (1996) Uniaxial compressive strength and point load strength. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 33:183–188Google Scholar
  6. D’Andrea DV, Fisher RL, DE Fogelson (1964) Prediction of compression strength from other rock properties. Colo Sch Mines Q 59(4B):623–640Google Scholar
  7. Deere DU, Miller RP (1966) Engineering classification and index properties for intact rock. Air Force Weapons Lab. Technical report, AFWL-TR 65–116, Kirtland Base, New MexicoGoogle Scholar
  8. Fener M, Kahraman S, Bilgil A, Gunaydin O (2005) Technical note: a comparative evaluation of indirect methods to estimate the compressive strength of rocks. Rock Mech Rock Eng 38(4):329–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Forster IR (1983) The influence of core sample geometry on the axial point-load test. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 20(6):291–295. doi: 10.1016/0148-9062(83)90599-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Grasso P, Xu S, Mahtab A (1992) Problems and promises of index testing of rocks. In: Tillerson JR, Wawersik WR (eds) Proceedings of the 33rd US symposium on rock mechanics. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 879–888Google Scholar
  11. Gunsallus KL, Kulhawy FH (1984) A comparative evaluation of rock strength measures. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 21:233–248Google Scholar
  12. Hassani FP, Scoble MJ, Whittaker BN (1980) Application of point load index test to strength determination of rock and proposals for new size-correction chart. In: Summers DA (ed) Proceedings of the 21st US symposium on rock mechanics. University of Missouri Press, Rolla, pp 543–564Google Scholar
  13. Heidari M, Khanlari G, Torabi-Kaveh M, Kargarian S (2012) Predicting the uniaxial compressive and tensile strengths of gypsum rock by point load testing. Rock Mech Rock Eng 45(2):265–273. doi: 10.1007/s00603-011-0196-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hoek E (1977) Rock mechanics laboratory testing in the context of a consulting engineering organization. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech 14:93–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kahraman S (2001) Evaluation of simple methods for assessing the uniaxial compressive strength of rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 38:981–994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kahraman S, Gunaydin O, Fener M (2005) The effect of porosity on the relation between uniaxial compressive strength and point load index. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 42(4):584–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mark C, Molinda GM (1996) Rating coal mine roof strength from exploratory drill core. In: the Proceeding of the 15th International Conference on Ground Control in Mining, Golden CO, pp 415–428Google Scholar
  18. Quane SL, Russel JK (2003) Rock strength as a metric of welding intensity in pyroclastic deposits. Eur J Miner 15:855–864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rusnak J, Mark C (2000) Using the point load test to determine the uniaxial compressive strength of coal measure rock. In: Peng SS, Mark C (eds) Proceedings of the 19th international conference on ground control in mining. West Virginia University, Morgantown, pp 362–371Google Scholar
  20. Sabatakakis N, Koukis G, Tsiambaos G, Papanakli S (2009) Index properties and strength variation controlled by microstructure for sedimentary rocks. Eng Geol 97:80–90Google Scholar
  21. Singh DP (1981) Determination of some engineering properties of weak rocks. In: Akai K (ed) Proceedings of the international symposium on weak rock. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 21–24Google Scholar
  22. Singh T, Kainthola A, Venkatesh AVA (2012) Correlation between point load index and uniaxial compressive strength for different rock types. Rock Mech Rock Eng 45(2):259–264. doi: 10.1007/s00603-011-0192-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Torabi-Kaveh M (2011) Study of evaporative rocks solubility in Gachsaran formation in the Chamshir Dam Site. M.Sc Thesis, Faculty of Sciences, Bu-Ali Sina University, HamedanGoogle Scholar
  24. Tsiambaos G, Sabatakakis N (2004) Considerations on strength of intact sedimentary rocks. Eng Geol 72:261–273Google Scholar
  25. Ulusay R, Tureli K, Ider MH (1994) Prediction of engineering properties of a selected litharenite sandstone from its petrographic characteristics using correlation and multivariate statistical techniques. Eng Geol 38:135–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Geology, Faculty of SciencesBu-Ali Sina UniversityHamedanIran

Personalised recommendations