Advertisement

Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering

, Volume 43, Issue 2, pp 167–184 | Cite as

Practical Estimates of Tensile Strength and Hoek–Brown Strength Parameter m i of Brittle Rocks

Original Paper

Abstract

By applying the Griffith stress criterion of brittle failure, one can find that the uniaxial compressive strength (σc) of rocks is eight times the value of the uniaxial tensile strength (σt). The Griffith strength ratio is smaller than what is normally measured for rocks, even with the consideration of crack closure. The reason is that Griffith’s theories address only the initiation of failure. Under tensile conditions, the crack propagation is unstable so that the tensile crack propagation stress (σcd)t and the peak tensile strength σt are almost identical to the tensile crack initiation stress (σci)t. On the other hand, the crack growth after crack initiation is stable under a predominantly compressive condition. Additional loading is required in compression to bring the stress from the crack initiation stress σci to the peak strength σc. It is proposed to estimate the tensile strength of strong brittle rocks from the strength ratio of \( R = {\frac{{\sigma_{\text{c}} }}{{\left| {\sigma_{\text{t}} } \right|}}} = 8{\frac{{\sigma_{\text{c}} }}{{\sigma_{\text{ci}} }}}. \) The term \( {\frac{{\sigma_{\text{c}} }}{{\sigma_{\text{ci}} }}} \) accounts for the difference of crack growth or propagation in tension and compression in uniaxial compression tests. \( {\frac{{\sigma_{c} }}{{\sigma_{ci} }}} \) depends on rock heterogeneity and is larger for coarse grained rocks than for fine grained rocks. σci can be obtained from volumetric strain measurement or acoustic emission (AE) monitoring. With the strength ratio R determined, the tensile strength can be indirectly obtained from \( \left| {\sigma_{\text{t}} } \right| = {\frac{{\sigma_{\text{c}} }}{R}} = {\frac{{\sigma_{\text{ci}} }}{8}}. \) It is found that the predicted tensile strengths using this method are in good agreement with test data. Finally, a practical estimate of the Hoek–Brown strength parameter m i is presented and a bi-segmental or multi-segmental representation of the Hoek–Brown strength envelope is suggested for some brittle rocks. In this fashion, the rock strength parameters like σt and m i, which require specialty tests such as direct tensile (or Brazilian) and triaxial compression tests for their determination, can be reasonably estimated from uniaxial compression tests.

Keywords

Griffith’s theory Uniaxial compressive strength Tensile strength Crack initiation Crack propagation/damage AE Volumetric strain 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank Mr. S.J. Kim, Mr. G. Maybee, and Mr. D. Marr for conducting the laboratory tests at the Geomechanics Research Centre, MIRARCO-Mining Innovation, Laurentian University, Canada. The author also would like to thank Drs. D. McCreath and E. Hoek for reviewing the manuscript, and Drs. P. Kaiser and D. Martin for many helpful discussions on brittle failure of rocks.

References

  1. Alber M, Heiland J (2001) Investigation of a limestone pillar failure part 1: geology, laboratory testing and numerical modeling. Rock Mech Rock Eng 34(3):167–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bell FG, Jermy CA (2000) The geotechnical character of some South African dolerites, especially their strength and durability. Q J Eng Geol Hydrogeol 33:59–76Google Scholar
  3. Bell FG, Lindsay P (1999) The petrographic and geomechanical properties of some sandstones from the Newspaper Member of the Natal Group near Durban, South Africa. Eng Geol 53(1):57–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bieniawski ZT (1967) Mechanism of brittle fracture of rock, parts I, II and III. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 4(4):395–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bordia SK (1972) Complete stress-volumetric strain equation for brittle rock up to strength failure. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 9(1):17–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brace WF, Paulding B, Scholz C (1966) Dilatancy in the fracture of crystalline crocks. J Geophys Res 71(16):3939–3953Google Scholar
  7. Brook N (1993) The measurement and estimation of basic rock strength. In: Comprehensive rock engineering, pp 41–66Google Scholar
  8. Cai M, Kaiser PK (2007) Obtaining modeling parameters for engineering design by rock mass characterization. In: Proceedings of the 11th ISRM Congress, Talyor & Francis Group, London, pp 381–384Google Scholar
  9. Cai M, Kaiser PK, Tasaka Y, Maejima T, Morioka H, Minami M (2004a) Generalized crack initiation and crack damage stress thresholds of brittle rock masses near underground excavations. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41(5):833–847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cai M, Kaiser PK, Uno H, Tasaka Y, Minami M (2004b) Estimation of rock mass strength and deformation modulus of jointed hard rock masses using the GSI system. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41(1):3–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cai M, Kaiser PK, Tasaka Y, Minami M (2007) Determination of residual strength parameters of jointed rock masses using the GSI system. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 44(2):247–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carter BJ (1992) Size and stress gradient effects on fracture around cavities. Rock Mech Rock Eng 25:167–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carter BJ, Scott Duncan EJ, Lajtai EZ (1991) Fitting strength criteria to intact rock. Geotech Geol Eng 9:73–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chang SH, Seto M, Lee CI (2001) Damage and fracture characteristics of Kimachi sandstone in uniaxial compression. Geosystem Eng 4(1):18–26Google Scholar
  15. Coviello A, Lagioia R, Nova R (2005) On the measurement of the tensile strength of soft rocks. Rock Mech Rock Eng 38(4):251–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Diederichs MS (1999) Instability of hard rock masses: the role of tensile damage and relaxation. Ph.D. Thesis, p 566Google Scholar
  17. Eberhardt E, Stead D, Stimpson B (1999) Quantifying progressive pre-peak brittle fracture damage in rock during uniaxial compression. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 36(3):361–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Griffith AA (1924) The theory of rupture. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Congress on Applied Mechanics, Delft, pp 54–63Google Scholar
  19. Heard HC, Abey AE, Bonner BP, Schock RN (1974) Mechanical behaviour of dry Westerley Granite at high confining pressure. p 14Google Scholar
  20. Hoek E (1965) Rock fracture under static stress conditions. National Mechanical Engineering Research Institute, Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, Pretoria, South AfricaGoogle Scholar
  21. Hoek E (2000) Practical rock engineering. http://www.rocscience.com, 313
  22. Hoek E (2007) Practical rock engineering. http://www.rocscience.com. p 342
  23. Hoek E, Bieniawski ZT (1984) Brittle fracture propagation in rock under compression. Int J Fracture 26(4):276–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hoek E, Brown ET (1980a) Empirical strength criterion for rock masses. J Geotech Eng Div ASCE 106(GT9):1013–1035Google Scholar
  25. Hoek E, Brown ET (1980b) Underground excavation in rock. Institution of Mining and Metallurgy, London, p 527Google Scholar
  26. Howarth DF, Rowlands JC (1987) Quantitative assessment of rock texture and correlation with drillability and strength properties. Rock Mech Rock Eng 20(1):57–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jaeger JC, Cook NGW (1979) Fundamentals of rock mechanics. Chapman-Hall and Science, London, p 585Google Scholar
  28. Johnson JW, Friedman M, Hopkins TN (1987) Strength and microfracturing of Westerly granite extended wet and dry at temperature to 800°C to 200 MPa. In: Proceedings of the 28th US rock mechanics symposium. TucsonGoogle Scholar
  29. Kemeny JM, Cook NGW (1987) Crack models for the failure of rocks in compression. In: Constitutive laws for engineering materials: theory and applications, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 879–887Google Scholar
  30. Lajtai EZ (1998) Microscopic fracture processes in a granite. Rock Mech Rock Eng 31(4):237–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Martin CD (1993) The strength of massive Lac du Bonnet granite around underground opening. Ph.D. thesis, p 278Google Scholar
  32. Martin CD (1997) Seventeenth Canadian Geotechnical Colloquium: the effect of cohesion loss and stress path on brittle rock strength. Can Geotech J 34(5):698–725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Martin CD, Lanyon GW (2001) EDZ in clay shale: Mont Terri. GeoScience LtdGoogle Scholar
  34. Martin CD, Stimpson B (1994) The effect of sample disturbance on laboratory properties of Lac du Bonnet granite. Can Geotech J 31:692–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McClintock FA, Walsh JB (1962) Friction on Griffith cracks in rocks under pressure. In: Proceedings of the 4th US National Congress on Applied Mechanics, New York, pp 1015–1021Google Scholar
  36. Murrell SAF (1963) A criterion for brittle fracture of rocks and concrete under triaxial stress and the effect of pore pressure on the criterion. In: Rock Mechanics, 563-577Google Scholar
  37. Murrell SAF (1964) The theory of the propagation of elliptical Griffith cracks under various conditions of plane strain or plane stress. Br J Appl Phys 15:1195–1223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nemat-Nasser S, Horii H (1982) Compression-induced nonplanar crack extension with application to splitting, exfoliation, and rockburst. J Geophysical Research 87(B8):6805–6821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Olsson M, Niklasson B, Wilson L, Andersson C, Christiansson R (2004) Äspö HRL experiences of blasting of the TASQ tunnel. 77Google Scholar
  40. Paterson MS, Wong TF (2005) Experimental rock deformation—The brittle field. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  41. Read RS, Martin CD (1996) Technical summary of AECL’s Mine-by experiment, phase 1: excavation response. AECL, p 169Google Scholar
  42. Schock RN, Heard HC, Stephens DR (1973) Stress–strain behaviour of granodiorite and two graywackes on compression to 20 kbar. J Geophys Res 78:5922–5941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sheorey PR (1997) Empirical rock failure criteria. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, p 176Google Scholar
  44. Tham LG, Liu H, Tang CA, Lee PKK, Tsui Y (2005) On tension failure of 2-D rock specimens and associated acoustic emission. Rock Mech Rock Eng 38(1):1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Vutukuri VS, Lama RD, Saluja SS (1974) Handbook on mechanical properties of rocks, vol I—testing techniques and results. Trans Tech Publications, p 280Google Scholar
  46. Wong RHC, Tang CA, Chau KT, Lin P (2002) Splitting failure in brittle rocks containing pre-existing flaws under uniaxial compression. Eng Fract Mech 69(17):1853–1871CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mansour Group of CompaniesSudburyCanada
  2. 2.Geomechanics Research Centre, MIRARCO-Mining InnovationLaurentian UniversitySudburyCanada

Personalised recommendations