Experimental and Numerical Studies on Rock Breaking with TBM Tools under High Stress Confinement

  • N. Innaurato
  • C. Oggeri
  • P. P. Oreste
  • R. Vinai
Article

Summary

The understanding of rock breaking and chipping due to the TBM cutter disks mechanism in deep tunnels is considered in this paper. The interest stems from the use of TBMs for the excavation of long Trans-Alpine tunnels. Some tests that simulate the disk cutter action at the tunnel face by means of an indenter, acting on a rock specimen are proposed. The rock specimen is confined through a flat-jack and a confinement-free area on one side of the specimen simulates the formation of a groove near the indenter, like it occurs in TBM excavation conditions. Results show a limited influence of the confinement stress versus the thrust increment required for breaking the rock between the indenter and the free side of the specimen. Numerical modelling of the cutter disk action on confined material has also been carried out in order to investigate further aspects of the fracture initiation. Also in this case the importance of the relative position between disk cutter and groove is pointed out.

Keywords: Rock, TBM, disk cutter, indenter, tunnel face, confinement. 

References

  1. Barton, N. 2000TBM tunnelling in jointed and faulted rockBalkemaRotterdamGoogle Scholar
  2. Bordet, C., Comes, G. (1975): Etude prévisionnelle de la forabilité des roches au tunnelier. Tunnels et Ouvrages Souterrains 7.Google Scholar
  3. Cook, N. G. W., Hood, M., Tsai, F. 1984Observations of crack growth in hard rock loaded by an indenterInt. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr.2197107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dollinger, G. L., Handewith, H. J., Breeds, C. D. 1999Use of punch test for estimating TBM performanceTunnelling Underground Space Technol.13403408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gaye, F. (1972): Efficient excavation. Tunnels Tunnelling 4(1), 39–48 and 4(2), 135–143.Google Scholar
  6. Gehring, K. (1995): Design criteria for TBM’s with respect to real rock pressure. In: Proc., Tunnel Boring Machines: trends in design and construction of mechanized tunnelling. Hagemberg, 43–53.Google Scholar
  7. Hartman, H. L. 1959Basic studies of percussion drillingTrans. Am. Min. Engn.2146875Google Scholar
  8. Innaurato, N., Oreste, P. P. (2000): L’interazione utensile-roccia nelle macchine di scavo per roccia. In: Barla, G. (ed.) VIII ciclo di Conferenze di Meccanica ed Ingegneria delle Rocce. Torino, Dec. 2000, 111–158.Google Scholar
  9. Innaurato, N., Oreste, P. P. (2001): Theoretical approach for assessment of the mechanics of rock failure in the TBMs tools-rock interaction. In: Proc., AITES – ITA World Tunnel Congress 2001, Progress in Tunnelling after 2000, Milan (Italy). Patron, Bologna, 227–236.Google Scholar
  10. Innaurato, N., Oggeri, C., Oreste, P. P. (2001): Performance and modelling of indenters and cutting tools for the Assessment of the borability in rock tunnelling. In: Sarkka, P., Eloranta, P. (eds.) Proc., Eurock Symposium Rock Mechanics, a Challenge for Society, 573–578.Google Scholar
  11. International Society for Rock Mechanics (1978): Commission on Standardization of Laboratory and Field Tests. Suggested methods for determining the unaxial compressive strength and deformability of rock materials. Committee on Laboratory tests, Document No. 8.Google Scholar
  12. Klein, S., Schmoll, M., Avrey, T. (1995): TBM performance at four hard rock tunnels in California. In: Proc., RETC, San Francisco, 61–65.Google Scholar
  13. Kou, S. Q., Lindqvist, P. A., Tang, C. A., Xu, X. H. 1999Numerical simulation of the cutting of inhomogeneous rocksInt. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr.36711717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lindqvist, P. A., Hai-Hui, L. 1983Behaviour of the crushed zone in rock indentationRock Mech. Rock Engng.16199207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Maurer, W. C., Rinehart, J. S. 1960Impact crater formation in rockJ. Appl. Physics317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Movinkel, T., Johannesen, O. 1986Geological parameters for hard rock tunnel boringTunnels Tunnelling184548Google Scholar
  17. Nishimatsu, Y. 1972The mechanics of rock cuttingInt. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr.9261270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Szwedzicki, T. 1998Indentation hardness testing of rockInt. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci.35825829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Tarkoy, P. J., Marconi, M. (1991): Difficult rock comminution and associated geological conditions. In: Proc., 6th Congress Tunnelling 91, IMM, London, 195–207.Google Scholar
  20. Thiercelin, M. (1989): Parameters controlling rock indentation. In: Proc., Rock at great depth. Balkema, Rotterdam, 85–92.Google Scholar
  21. Timoshenko, S., Goodier, J. N. 1951Theory of elasticityMcGraw HillNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Wang, J. K., Lehnoff, T. F. 1976Bit penetration into rock – a finite element studyInt. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr.131116CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. Innaurato
    • 1
  • C. Oggeri
    • 1
  • P. P. Oreste
    • 1
  • R. Vinai
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Land, Environmental and Geotechnology EngineeringUniversity of TechnologyTorinoItaly

Personalised recommendations