Advertisement

Few-Body Systems

, Volume 45, Issue 2–4, pp 203–206 | Cite as

A Quantum Version of Wigner’s Transition State Theory

  • R. Schubert
  • H. WaalkensEmail author
  • S. Wiggins
Open Access
Article

Abstract

A quantum version of a recent realization of Wigner’s transition state theory in phase space is presented. The theory developed builds on a quantum normal form which locally decouples the quantum dynamics near the transition state to any desired order in \({\hbar}\). This leads to an explicit algorithm to compute cumulative quantum reaction rates and the associated Gamov–Siegert resonances with high accuracy. This algorithm is very efficient since, as opposed to other approaches, it requires no quantum time propagation.

Keywords

Unitary Transformation Quantum Dynamic Transition State Theory Quantum Version Quantum Simulation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

H. Waalkens acknowledges support by EPSRC under grant number EP/E024629/1. S.Wiggins acknowledges the support by the Office of Naval Research Under grant number N00014-01-0769.

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

References

  1. 1.
    Skodje R.T., Yang X.: The observation of quantum bottleneck states. Int. Rev. Phys. Chem. 23, 253 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pechukas P., McLafferty F.J.: On transition-state theory and the classical mechanics of collinear collisions. J. Chem. Phys. 58, 1622 (1973)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pechukas P., Pollak E.: Transition states, trapped trajectories, and claasical bound states embedded in the continuum. J. Chem. Phys. 69, 1218 (1978)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wiggins S.: Normally Hyperbolic Invariant Manifolds in Dynamical Systems. Springer, Berlin (1994)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Uzer T., Jaffé C., Palacián J., Yanguas P., Wiggins S.: The geometry of reaction dynamics. Nonlinearity 15, 957 (2001)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Miller W.H.: Spiers Memorial Lecture. Farad. Discuss. 110, 1 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Friedman R.S., Truhlar D.G.: Chemical reaction thresholds are resonances. Chem. Phys. Lett. 183, 539 (1991)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schubert R., Waalkens H., Wiggins S.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 218302 (2006)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Waalkens H., Schubert R., Wiggins S.: Efficient computation of transition state resonances and reaction rates from a quantum normal form. Nonlinearity 21, R1 (2008)zbMATHCrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wiggins S., Wiesenfeld L., Jaffé C., Uzer T.: Impenetrable barriers in phase-space. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5478 (2001)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Waalkens H., Wiggins S.: Direct construction of a dividing surface of minimal flux for multi-degree-of-freedom systems that cannot be recrossed. J. Phys. A 37, L435 (2004)zbMATHCrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of MathematicsUniversity Walk, University of BristolBristolUK
  2. 2.Department of MathematicsUniversity of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations