Advertisement

Sleeve plus procedures: need of time

  • Chih-Kun Huang
  • Abhishek KatakwarEmail author
Short Communication
  • 62 Downloads

Abstract

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as a standalone procedure has gained a lot of popularity over laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in the last decades and is the most frequently performed bariatric procedure worldwide; however, the long-term results are not promising in terms of weight regain and re-emergence of comorbidities. Considering the proven concept of biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch, many novel procedures have been developed involving a sleeve gastrectomy along with some intestinal bypass or alteration in small intestine anatomy. These procedures show better technical feasibility and are associated with less post-operative morbidity, sleeve plus procedures permanently adopt the digestive tract to the present lifestyle, by eliminating the gastric storage of hypercaloric and excessively processed food, and providing the ileum with the needed stimulus for incretin release.

Keywords

Sleeve gastrectomy Bariatric surgery Metabolic procedure 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge Dr. V Amar, bariatric and metabolic Surgeon, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad, India 500033 for contributing the surgical figures.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest in association with the present study.

References

  1. 1.
    Cao J, Ren Q, Tan C, Duan J. Small intestinal bypass induces a persistent weight-loss effect and improves glucose tolerance in obese rats. Obes Surg. 2017;27:1859–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cheng Y, Huang X, Wu D, Liu Q, Zhong M, Liu T, et al. Sleeve gastrectomy with bypass of proximal small intestine provides better diabetes control than sleeve gastrectomy alone under postoperative high-fat diet. Obes Surg. 2019;29:84–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Huang CK, Liu CC, Hsin MC, Chen YC. Sleeve and sleeve plus. Ann Laparosc Endosc Surg. 2017;2:24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dorman RB, Rasmus NF, al-Haddad BJ, Serrot FJ, Slusarek BM, Sampson BK, et al. Benefits and complications of the duodenal switch/biliopancreatic diversion compared to the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surgery. 2012;152:758–65 (discussion 765–7).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sánchez-Pernaute A, Rubio Herrera MA, Pérez-Aguirre E, García Pérez JC, Cabrerizo L, Díez Valladares L, et al. Proximal duodenal-ileal end-to-side bypass with sleeve gastrectomy: proposed technique. Obes Surg. 2007;17:1614–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kasama K, Tagaya N, Kanehira E, Oshiro T, Seki Y, Kinouchi M, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with duodenojejunal bypass: technique and preliminary results. Obes Surg. 2009;19:1341–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Huang CK, Goel R, Tai CM, Yen YC, Gohil VD, Chen XY. Novel metabolic surgery for type II diabetes mellitus: loop duodenojejunal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2013;23:481–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ugale S, Vennapusa A, Katakwar A, Ugale A. Laparoscopic bariatric surgery current trends and controversies. Ann Laparosc Endosc Surg. 2017;2:154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Body-Science and Metabolic Disorders International (B.M.I) Medical CentreChina Medical University HospitalTaichung CityTaiwan
  2. 2.Bariatric and Metabolic SurgeryAIG Hospitals (Unit of Asian Institute of Gastroenterology)HyderabadIndia

Personalised recommendations