Current status of post-operative infections due to antimicrobial-resistant bacteria after digestive tract surgery in Japan: Japan Postoperative Infectious Complications Survey in 2015 (JPICS’15)
We herein report the findings of the Japan Postoperative Infectious Complication Survey in 2015 (JPICS'15), which evaluated the rate of post-operative infections and colonization due to antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) bacteria after digestive tract surgery.
This survey by the Japan Society of Surgical Infection included patients undergoing digestive tract surgery at 28 centers between September 2015 and March 2016. Data included patient background characteristics, type of surgery, contamination status, and type of post-operative infections, including surgical site infections (SSIs), remote infections (RIs), and colonization.
During the study period, 7,565 surgeries (of 896 types) were performed; among them, 905 cases demonstrated bacteria after digestive tract surgery. The survey revealed that post-operative infections or colonization by AMR bacteria occurred in 0.9% of the patient cohort, constituting 7.5% of post-operative infections, including 5.6% of SSIs and 1.8% of RIs. Extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus were the predominant AMR bacteria isolated from patients after digestive tract surgery. Patients infected with AMR bacteria had a poor prognosis.
Our results reveal that 7.5% of the post-operative infections were due to AMR bacteria, indicating the need for antibacterial coverage against AMR bacteria in patients with critical post-operative infections.
KeywordsSurgical site infection Remote infection Post-operative infection Digestive tract surgery
We would like to extend our deep appreciation to the participants of this survey. The participating institutions and chief participants were follows: Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Fukuoka University (S. Takeno), Division of Surgery, Fujinomiya City General Hospital (T. Okumura), Department of Digestive Surgery, Nihon University School of Medicine (O. Aramaki), Department of Surgery, Nippon Medical School Tama-Nagayama Hospital (H. Maruyama), Institute of Gastroenterology, Nippon Medical School Musashikosugi Hospital (M. Watanabe), Department of Surgery, Nippon Medical School (H. Kanno), Department of Surgery, Toho University Omori medical center (T. Maeda), Department of Surgery, Toho University Sakura Medical Center (M. Nagashima), Department of Surgery, The Jikei University School of Medicine (M. Kanehira), Department of Surgery, Osaka Rosai Hospital (M. Murakami), Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine (S. Kubo), Gastroenterological Surgery, Chiba Cancer Center (Y. Nabeya), Department of Gastroenterological and General Surgery, School of Medicine, Showa University (A. Fujimori), Japanese Red Cross Ogawa Hospital (K. Shimura), Department of Surgery, Teine Keijinkai Hospital (M. Takada), Department of Surgery, Jiaikai Imamura hospital (S. Hokita), Sapporo General City Hospital (K. Yamamoto), Department of Surgery 1, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health (T. Tamura), Department of Gastroenterological, Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine (S. Takeda), Department of Innovative Surgery and Surgical Techniques Development, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine (M. Kobayashi), Departments of Surgery, Saiseikai Niigata Daini Hospital (A. Kuwabara), Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine (K. Tokizawa), Department of Surgery, Kyoto-Katsura Hospital (R. Nishitai), Department of Digestive Surgery, Tsushimi Hospital (T. Yamamoto), Department of Infection Control and Prevention, Aichi Medical University Hospital (Y. Kato), Department of Surgery, Mazda Hospital (S. Akagi), Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kawasaki Saiwai Hospital (K. Narita).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 8.Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR, Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1999;1999(20):250–78.Google Scholar
- 12.Pessaux P, Msika S, Atalla D, Hay JM, Flamant Y, French Association for Surgical Research. Risk factors for postoperative infectious complications in noncolorectal abdominal surgery: a multivariate analysis based on a prospective multicenter study of 4718 patients. Arch Surg. 2003;138:314–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Siegel JD, Rhinehart E, Jackson M, Chiarello L, Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Management of multidrug-resistant organisms in health care settings, 2006. Am J Infect Control. 2007; 35:S165–93.Google Scholar
- 16.Hawser SP, Bouchillon SK, Hoban DJ, Badal RE, Hsueh PR, Paterson DL. Emergence of high levels of extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase-producing gram-negative bacilli in the Asia-Pacific region: data from the Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends (SMART) program, 2007. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53:3280–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Gil CM, Climent MNM, Del Moral LJA, Durán PM, Rodríguez VD, Rodríguez CG. Evaluation of compliance with the antibiotic prophylaxis protocol in breast surgery and its effect on the incidence of surgical infection. An Sist Sanit Navar. 2019;0:70189.Google Scholar
- 28.Pawłowska I, Ziółkowski G, Wójkowska-Mach J, Bielecki T. Can surgical site infections be controlled through microbiological surveillance? A three-year laboratory-based surveillance at an orthopaedic unit, retrospective observatory study. Int Orthop. 2019. [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
- 31.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically; approved stand-tenth edition (M07–A10). Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2015.Google Scholar
- 36.Badia JM, Casey AL, Petrosillo N, Hudson P, Mitchell S, Crosby C. The impact of surgical site infection on healthcare costs and patient outcomes: a systematic review of the economic and quality of life burden associated with surgical site infections in six European countries. J Hosp Infect. 2017;96:1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 37.Huttner B, Robicsek AA, Gervaz P, Perencevich EN, Schiffer E, Schrenzel J, et al. Epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carriage and MRSA surgical site infections in patients undergoing colorectal surgery: a cohort study in two centers. Surg Infect. 2012;13:401–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 38.Leistner R, Schroder C, Geffers C, Breier AC, Gastmeier P, Behnke M. Regional distribution of nosocomial infections due to ESBL-positive Enterobacteriaceae in Germany: data from the German National Reference Center for the Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections (KISS). Clin Microbiol Infect. 2015;21(255):e1–5.Google Scholar
- 41.Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Japan nosocomial infections surveillance. 2016. https://www.nihjanis.jp/english/about/index.htmlofsubordinatedocument. Accessed 10 Dec 2017.
- 43.Surveillance of surgical site infections in Europe 2010–2011. Stockholm: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. 2013. https://ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications/Publications/SSI-in-europe-2010-2011.pdf of subordinate document. Accessed 10 Dec 2017.
- 44.Bratzler DW, Houck PM, Surgical Infection Prevention Guidelines Writers Workgroup, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Association of Critical Care Nurses, American Association of Nurse Anesthetists, et al. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for surgery: An advisory statement from the National Surgical Infection Prevention Project. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;38:1706–15.Google Scholar