Advertisement

Surgery Today

, Volume 49, Issue 2, pp 124–129 | Cite as

Surgical outcomes of modified-maze procedures in adults with atrial septal defect

  • Shun-Ichiro SakamotoEmail author
  • Atsushi Hiromoto
  • Yosuke Ishii
  • Takashi Sasaki
  • Yasuo Miyagi
  • Takashi Nitta
Original Article
  • 61 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

We examined the outcome of modified-maze procedures reflecting a single-center strategy in the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) associated with atrial septal defect (ASD) in adults.

Methods

A retrospective chart review was performed for 29 patients who underwent surgical ASD closure and 2 types of maze procedures (full and simplified maze procedures) for AF. The outcome related to the each procedure was examined. A Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed to assess the independent predictors of AF and atrial tachycardia (AT) recurrence.

Results

The rates of freedom from AF and AT recurrence at 1 and 4 years were 86.6% and 72.2% in the full maze group and 78.5% and 62.8% in the simplified maze group, respectively (p = 0.70). The only risk factor for recurrence was the age at the time of surgery. A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis gave an optimum cut-off value of 58 years of age for predicting recurrence within 2 years (58.4% for ≥ 58 years versus 5.9% for < 58 years, p = 0.003).

Conclusions

Simplification of the maze procedure was not associated with AF or AT recurrence. The age at the time of surgery might be a clinical predictor of success or failure in adult patients.

Keywords

Maze procedure Atrial septal defect Radiofrequency ablation 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Shun-ichiro Sakamoto and the other co-authors have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Gatzoulis MA, Freeman MA, Siu SC, Webb GD, Harris L. Atrial arrhythmia after surgical closure of atrial septal defects in adults. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:839–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mantovan R, Gatzoulis MA, Pedrocco A, Ius P, Cavallini C, De Leo A, et al. Supraventricular arrhythmia before and after surgical closure of atrial septal defects: Spectrum, prognosis and management. Europace. 2003;5:133–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Liang T, XiangJun Z, XiaoJing M, Yun L, Leng CY. New minimally invasive technique to occlude secundum atrial septal defect in 53 patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;81:1417–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hongxin L, Wenbin G, Lijun S, Zhengjun W, Hao L, Chengwei Z, et al. Intraoperative device closure of secundum atrial septal defect with a right anterior minithoracotomy in 100 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;134:946–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Xiao C, Gao C, Yang M, Wang G, Wu Y, Wang J, et al. Totally robotic atrial septal defect closure: 7-year single-institution experience and follow-up. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014;19:933–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Prasad SM, Maniar HS, Diodato MD, Schuessler RB, Damiano RJ Jr. Physiological consequences of bipolar radiofrequency energy on the atria and pulmonary veins: a chronic animal study. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;76:836–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sakamoto S, Voeller RK, Melby SJ, Lall SC, Chang NL, Schuessler RB, et al. Surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation: the efficacy of a novel bipolar pen device in the cardioplegically arrested and beating heart. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;136:1295–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Damiano RJ Jr, Badhwar V, Acker MA, Veeragandham RS, Kress DC, Robertson JO, et al. The CURE-AF trial: a prospective, multicenter trial of irrigated radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation during concomitant cardiac surgery. Heart Rhythm. 2014;11:39–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yanagawa B, Holmes SD, Henry L, Hunt S, Ad N. Outcome of concomitant Cox-maze III procedure using an argon-based cryosurgical system: a single-center experience with 250 patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;95:1633–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Melby SJ, Zierer A, Bailey MS, Cox JL, Lawton JS, Munfakh N, et al. A new era in the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation: the impact of ablation technology and lesion set on procedural efficacy. Ann Surg. 2006;244:583–92.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stockhausen KT. Declaration of Helsinki: revising ethical research guidelines for the 21st century. Med J Aust. 2000;172:252–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ishii Y, Nitta T, Kambe M, Kurita J, Ochi M, Miyauchi Y, et al. Intraoperative verification of conduction block in atrial fibrillation surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;136:998–1004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Calkins H, Hindricks G, Cappato R, Kim YH, Saad EB, Aguinaga L, et al. 2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2017;14:e275–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kobayashi J, Yamamoto F, Nakano K, Sasako Y, Kitamura S, Kosakai Y. Maze procedure for atrial fibrillation associated with atrial septal defect. Circulation. 1998;98:399–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Im YM, Kim JB, Yun SC, Lee JW, Chung CH, Park JJ, et al. Arrhythmia surgery for atrial fibrillation associated with atrial septal defect: right-sided maze versus biatrial maze. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;145:648–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jiang Z, Ma N, Yin H, Ding F, Liu H, Mei J. Biatrial ablation versus limited right atrial ablation for atrial fibrillation associated with atrial septal defect in adults. Surg Today. 2015;45:858–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nitta T, Sakamoto S, Miyagi Y, Fujii M, Ishii Y, Ochi M. Reentrant and focal activations during atrial fibrillation in patients with atrial septal defect. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;96:1266–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Morton JB, Sanders P, Vohra JK, Sparks PB, Morgan JG, Spence SJ, et al. Effect of chronic right atrial stretch on atrial electrical remodeling in patients with an atrial septal defect. Circulation. 2003;107:1775–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Roberts-Thomson KC, John B, Worthley SG, Brooks AG, Stiles MK, Lau DH, et al. Left atrial remodeling in patients with atrial septal defects. Heart Rhythm. 2009;6:1000–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Park KM, Hwang JK, Chun KJ, Park SJ, On YK, Kim JS, et al. Prediction of early-onset atrial tachyarrhythmia after successful trans-catheter device closure of atrial septal defect. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95:e4706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gatzoulis MA, Freeman MA, Siu SC, Webb GD, Harris L. Atrial arrhythmia after surgical closure of atrial septal defects in adults. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(11):839–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cox JL, Ad N, Palazzo T, Fitzpatrick S, Suyderhoud JP, DeGroot KW, et al. Current status of the maze procedure for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;12(1):15–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pecha S, Schäfer T, Yildirim Y, Ahmadzade T, Willems S, Reichenspurner H, et al. Predictors for permanent pacemaker implantation after concomitant surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;147:984–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Robertson JO, Cuculich PS, Saint LL, Schuessler RB, Moon MR, Lawton J, et al. Predictors and risk of pacemaker implantation after the Cox-maze IV procedure. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;95:2015–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lee JM, Kalman JM. Sinus node dysfunction and atrial fibrillation: two sides of the same coin? Europace. 2013;15:161–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ailawadi G, Gerdisch MW, Harvey RL, Hooker RL, Damiano RJ Jr, Salamon T, et al. Exclusion of the left atrial appendage with a novel device: early results of a multicenter trial. J Thorac Cariovasc Surg. 2011;142:1002–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Feinberg MS1, Waggoner AD, Kater KM, Cox JL, Lindsay BD, Pérez JE. Restoration of atrial function after the maze procedure for patients with atrial fibrillation. Assessment by Doppler echocardiography. Circulation. 1994;90:285–92.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shun-Ichiro Sakamoto
    • 1
    Email author
  • Atsushi Hiromoto
    • 1
  • Yosuke Ishii
    • 1
  • Takashi Sasaki
    • 1
  • Yasuo Miyagi
    • 1
  • Takashi Nitta
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Cardiovascular SurgeryNippon Medical SchoolTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations