Prognostic factors for cytology-positive gastric cancer
- 163 Downloads
Positive peritoneal lavage cytology for gastric carcinoma cells (CY1) is considered distant metastasis and is classified as Stage IV. However, patients with CY1 comprise a heterogeneous population, and their prognosis varies greatly. The prognostic factors for gastric cancer patients with CY1 were retrospectively reviewed.
The participants were 80 gastric cancer patients with CY1 in our institution encountered between 2005 and 2017. Prognostic factors were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analyses.
The operative procedure was distal gastrectomy for 30 patients, total gastrectomy for 27 patients, staging laparoscopy for 10 patients, gastrojejunostomy for 8 patients, and probe laparotomy for 5 patients. Other distant metastases were recognized in 36 patients. A multivariate analysis revealed that other distant metastases were the strongest independent risk factor for the overall survival (p < 0.0001). When the cohort was limited to CY1 patients without other distant metastases, cN2–3 (p = 0.01), the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) < 40 (p = 0.02) and Type 4 (p = 0.03) were independent risk factors according to a multivariate analysis. The survivals of patients with cN2–3 or PNI < 40 after gastrectomy were equivalent to those with other distant metastases, as assessed by log-rank analyses.
The prognoses of CY1 gastric cancer patients with cN2–3 or PNI < 40 were poor, even after gastrectomy.
KeywordsStomach neoplasms Abdominal lavage cytology Lymph node metastasis
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
All authors have no conflicts of interest.
- 1.Cancer Information Service, National Cancer Center, Japan. Cancer Registry and Statistics. https://ganjoho.jp/reg_stat/statistics/dl/index.html#mortality Accessed 1 Apr 2018.
- 2.Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. The Japanese gastric cancer registry in 2009. http://www.jgca.jp/entry/iganhtml/doc/2009_report.pdf Accessed 1 Apr 2018.
- 3.Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma, the 15th edition (in Japanese). Tokyo: Kanehara; 2017.Google Scholar
- 4.Brierley JD, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C. TNM classification of malignant tumours, the eighth edition. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell; 2017.Google Scholar
- 5.Association Japanese Gastric Cancer. Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines, 5th ed. Tokyo: Kanehara; 2018 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
- 7.Onodera T, Goseki N, Kosaki G. Prognostic nutritional index in gastrointestinal surgery of malnourished cancer patients (in Japanese with English abstract). Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi (J Jpn Surg Society). 1984;85:1001–5.Google Scholar
- 9.American Society of Anesthesiologists. ASA physical status classification system. https://www.asahq.org/resources/clinical-information/asa-physical-status-classification-system Accessed 1 Apr 2018.
- 13.Nishikawa K, Fujitani K, Endo S, Kawada J, Hirao M, Hamakawa T, et al. Is gastrectomy for CY1 gastric cancer truly essential? [abstract]. In 90th Annual Meeting of the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association program: 2018 Mar 7–9: Yokohama. Japan: Abstract PP230.Google Scholar