Advertisement

Surgery Today

, Volume 48, Issue 2, pp 167–174 | Cite as

Successful removal of an internal pancreatic stent that migrated into the bile duct using double-balloon enteroscopy after pancreaticoduodenectomy

  • Seiko Hirono
  • Manabu Kawai
  • Yasunobu Yamashita
  • Ken-ichi Okada
  • Motoki Miyazawa
  • Masaki Ueno
  • Yoshimasa Maeda
  • Masahiro Itonaga
  • Masayuki Kitano
  • Hiroki YamaueEmail author
Original Article
  • 177 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

Internal stents used during pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) are generally spontaneously passed through the rectum by defecation. However, we encountered six patients with internal stents that migrated into the bile duct after PD. We herein report the outcomes of these six patients and the usefulness of double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) for removal of such stents from the bile duct.

Methods

An internal stent was placed across pancreaticojejunostomy in 416 (68.8%) of 605 consecutive patients undergoing PD between 2005 and 2015. This study evaluated the characteristics and outcomes of the six patients whose internal stent migrated into the bile duct.

Results

Migration of an internal stent into the bile duct was found during follow-up computed tomography (CT) in 6 (1.4%) of 416 patients who had an internal stent placed during PD. Three patients developed stent-induced cholangitis, and two had bile duct stones. Excluding one patient whose internal stent spontaneously slipped out and disappeared from the bile duct, all patients underwent successful removal of a stent from the bile duct by a single instance of biliary intervention involving DBE.

Conclusions

Removal of a stent from the bile duct using DBE is a feasible and useful procedure that should be considered if an internal stent is detected during follow-up CT after PD.

Keywords

Internal pancreatic stent Pancreaticoduodenectomy Migration Bile duct Double-balloon enteroscopy 

Notes

Author contributions

HY and SH had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Study concept and design: SH, MK, MK, and HY. Acquisition or interpretation of data: SH, YY, KO, MM, and MU. Draft of the manuscript: SH, MK, YY, and HY. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: SH, YY, MK, and HY. Administrative, technical, or material support: SH, MK, YY, YM, MI, and HY. Study supervision: MK and HY.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

We have no financial interests or potential conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Sohn TA, Lillmore KD, Pitt HA, Talamini MA, et al. Six hundred fifty consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990s: pathology, complications, and outcomes. Ann Surg. 1997;226:248–57.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Büchler MW, Friess H, Wagner M, Kulli C, Wagner V, Z’Graggen K. Pancreatic fistula after pancreatic head resection. Br J Surg. 2000;87:883–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bassi C, Falconi M, Salvia R, Mascetta G, Molinari E, Pederzoli P. Management of complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy in a high volume centre: results on 150 consecutive patients. Dig Surg. 2001;18:453–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kimura W, Miyata H, Gotoh M, Hirai I, Kenjo A, Kitagawa Y, et al. A pancreaticoduodenectomy risk model derived from 8575 cases from a national single-race population (Japanese) using a web-based data entry system: the 30-day and in-hospital mortality rates for pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg. 2014;259:773–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Poon RT, Fan ST, Lo CM, Ng KK, Yuen WK, Yeung C, et al. External drainage of pancreatic duct with a stent to reduce leakage rate of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2007;246:425–33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tani M, Kawai M, Hirono S, Ina S, Miyazawa M, Shimizu A, et al. A prospective randomized controlled trial of internal versus external drainage with pancreaticojejunostomy for pancreaticoduodenectomy. Am J Surg. 2010;199:759–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jang JY, Chang YR, Kim SW, Choi SH, Park SJ, Lee SE, et al. Randomized multicenter trial comparing external and internal pancreatic stenting during pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg. 2016;103:668–75.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Winter JM, Cameron JL, Campbell KA, Chang DC, Riall TS, Schulick RD, et al. Does pancreatic duct stenting decrease the rate of pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a prospective randomized trial. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006;10:1280–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yamada D, Eguchi H, Asaoka T, Tomihara H, Noda T, Wada H, et al. The basal nutritional state of PDAC patients is the dominant factor for completing adjuvant chemotherapy. Surg Today. 2017. doi: 10.1007/200595-017-1522-x.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tomihara H, Eguchi H, Yamada D, Gotoh K, Kawamoto K, Wada H, et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy does not compromise the feasibility of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Surg Today. 2017;47:218–26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kadowaki S, Miura F, Amano H, Toyota N, Wada K, Shibuya M, et al. Whereabouts of an internal short stent placed across the pancreaticojejunostomy following pancreatoduodenectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2012;19:566–77.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Park SH, Kim JH, Noh SY, Byun JH, Lee SS, Kim HJ, et al. Migration of internal pancreaticojejunostomy stents into the bile ducts in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015;19:1995–2002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Price LH, Brandabur JJ, Kozarek RA, Gluck M, Traverso WL, Irani S. Good stents gone bad: endoscopic treatment of proximally migrated pancreatic duct stents. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;70:174–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rezvani M, O’Moore PV, Pezzi CM. Late pancreaticojejunostomy stent migration and hepatic abscess after Whipple procedure. J Surg Educ. 2007;64:220–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Levy MJ, Chari S, Adler DG, Clain JE, Gostout CJ, Harewood GC, et al. Complications of temporary pancreatic stent insertion for pancreaticojejunal anastomosis during pancreaticoduodenectomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;59:719–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Layec S, D’Halluin PN, Pagenault M, Sulpice L, Meunier B, Bretagne JF. Removal of transanastomotic pancreatic stent tubes after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a new role for double-balloon enteroscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72:449–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Biffl WL, Moore EE. Pancreaticojejunal stent migration resulting in “bezoar ileus”. Am J Surg. 2000;180:115–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ortega PM, Zozaya-Larequi G, Arredondo J, Marti-Cruchaga P, Bellver M, Sánchez-Justicia C, et al. Distal migration of a transanastomotic pancreatic stent resulting in bowel perforation 19 years after pancreatoduodenectomy: report of a case. Surg Today. 2015;45:374–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gostout CJ, Bender CE. Cholangiopancreatography, sphincterotomy, and common bile duct stone removal via Roux-en-Y limb enteroscopy. Gastroenterology. 1988;95:156–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hintze RE, Adler A, Veltzke W, Abou-Rebyeh H. Endoscopic access to the papilla of Vater for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with Billroth II or Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy. Endoscopy. 1997;29:69–73.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Elton E, Hanson BL, Qaseen T, Howell DA. Diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP using an enteroscope and pediatric colonoscope in long-limb surgical bypass patients. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;47:62–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yamamoto H, Sekine Y, Sato Y, Higashizawa T, Miyata T, Iino S, et al. Total enteroscopy with nonsurgical steerable double balloon method. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;53:216–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Shimatani M, Matsushita M, Takaoka M, Koyabu M, Ikeura T, Kato K, et al. Effective ‘short’ double-balloon enteroscope for diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP in patients with altered gastrointestinal anatomy: a large case series. Endoscopy. 2009;41:849–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Parlak E, Cicek B, Disibeyaz S, Cengiz C, Yurdakul M, Akdoğan M, et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography by double balloon enteroscopy in patients with Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:466–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Itoi T, Ishii K, Sofuni A, Itokawa F, Tsuchiya T, Kurihara T, et al. Long- and short-type double-balloon enteroscopy-associated therapeutic ERCP for intact papilla in patients with a Roux-en-Y anastomosis. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:713–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tsujino T, Yamada A, Isayama H, Kogure H, Sasahira N, Hirano K, et al. Experiences of biliary interventions using short double-balloon enteroscopy in patients with Roux-en-Y anastomosis or hepaticojejunostomy. Dig Endosc. 2010;22:211–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sakakihara I, Kato H, Muro S, Noma Y, Yamamoto N, Harada R, et al. Double-balloon enteroscopy for choledochojejunal anastomotic stenosis after hepato-biliary-pancreatic operation. Dig Endosc. 2015;27:146–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Katanuma A, Isayama H. Current status of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in patients with surgically altered anatomy in Japan: questionnaire surgery and important discussion points at endoscopic forum Japan 2013. Dig Endosc. 2014;26:109–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kawai M, Tani M, Hirono S, Miyazawa M, Shimizu A, Uchiyama K, et al. Pylorus ring resection reduces delayed gastric emptying in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial of pylorus-resecting versus pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Ann Surg. 2011;253:495–501.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tani M, Terasawa H, Kawai M, Ina S, Hirono S, Uchiyama K, et al. Improvement of delayed gastric emptying in pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy. Results of a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2006;243:316–20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tani M, Kawai M, Hirno S, Okada KI, Miyazawa M, Shimizu A, et al. Randomized clinical trial of isolated Roux-en-Y versus conventional reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg. 2014;101:1084–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J, et al. International Study Group on pancreatic fistula definition. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery. 2005;138:8–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ, Izbicki JR, et al. Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery. 2007;142:761–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ, et al. Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery. 2007;142:20–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A. Classification of surgical complications. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan KK 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Seiko Hirono
    • 1
  • Manabu Kawai
    • 1
  • Yasunobu Yamashita
    • 2
  • Ken-ichi Okada
    • 1
  • Motoki Miyazawa
    • 1
  • Masaki Ueno
    • 1
  • Yoshimasa Maeda
    • 2
  • Masahiro Itonaga
    • 2
  • Masayuki Kitano
    • 2
  • Hiroki Yamaue
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Second Department of Surgery, School of MedicineWakayama Medical UniversityWakayamaJapan
  2. 2.Second Department of Internal Medicine, School of MedicineWakayama Medical UniversityWakayamaJapan

Personalised recommendations