Surgery Today

, Volume 45, Issue 7, pp 819–825 | Cite as

Advantages of the prone position for minimally invasive esophagectomy in comparison to the left decubitus position: better oxygenation after minimally invasive esophagectomy

  • Eiji Tanaka
  • Hiroshi Okabe
  • Yousuke Kinjo
  • Shigeru Tsunoda
  • Kazutaka Obama
  • Shigeo Hisamori
  • Yoshiharu Sakai
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate whether minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) in the prone position has advantages over the left decubitus position.

Method

A total of 110 consecutive patients with esophageal cancer who had undergone MIE were included in the analysis. The clinical outcomes were compared between 51 patients treated in the prone position (prone group) and 59 patients treated in the left decubitus position (LD group). The main outcome was postoperative respiratory complications and postoperative oxygenation [arterial oxygen pressure/fraction of inspired oxygen (P/F ratio)]. The secondary outcomes included the length of the operation, blood loss, number of dissected lymph nodes, postoperative morbidities and mortality.

Results

The P/F ratio after the operation was significantly higher in the prone group (0 h: P = 0.01, 12 h: P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in the frequency of respiratory complications (P = 0.89). The blood loss in the prone group was significantly lower (P < 0.001), and the number of dissected intrathoracic lymph nodes was significantly higher (P = 0.03) than in the LD group. No significant differences were observed in the frequencies of overall postoperative complications.

Conclusion

MIE in the prone position preserves better oxygenation of patients during the early recovery period, and is associated with less blood loss and a larger number of dissected lymph nodes.

Keywords

Esophageal cancer Minimally invasive surgery Prone position 

Notes

Conflict of interest

Authors Eiji Tanaka, Hiroshi Okabe, Yousuke Kinjo, Shigeru Tsunoda, Kazutaka Obama, Shigeo Hisamori, and Yoshiharu Sakai have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Supplementary material

595_2014_1061_MOESM1_ESM.doc (52 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 51 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:69–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Altorki N, Kent M, Ferrara C, Port J. Three-field lymph node dissection for squamous cell and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. Ann Surg. 2002;236:177–83.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Akiyama H, Tsurumaru M, Udagawa H, Kajiyama Y. Radical lymph node dissection for cancer of the thoracic esophagus. Ann Surg. 1994;220:364–72 discussion 372–63.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Putnam JB, Suell DM, McMurtrey MJ, Ryan MB, Walsh GL, Natarajan G, et al. Comparison of three techniques of esophagectomy within a residency training program. Ann Thorac Surg. 1994;57:319–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Luketich JD, Alvelo-Rivera M, Buenaventura PO, Christie NA, McCaughan JS, Litle VR, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients. Ann Surg 2003; 238:486–494; discussion 485–94.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nguyen NT, Hinojosa MW, Smith BR, Chang KJ, Gray J, Hoyt D. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: lessons learned from 104 operations. Ann Surg. 2008;248:1081–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Watanabe M, Baba Y, Nagai Y, Baba H. Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: an updated review. Surg Today. 2013;43:237–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Iwahashi M, Nakamori M, Nakamura M, Ojima T, Katsuda M, Iida T, et al. Clinical benefits of thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position for esophageal cancer. Surg Today. 2014;44:1708–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW, Bonavina L, Rosman C, Garcia JR, et al. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2012; 379:1887–1892.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Noshiro H, Iwasaki H, Kobayashi K, Uchiyama A, Miyasaka Y, Masatsugu T, et al. Lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve by a minimally invasive esophagectomy in the prone position for thoracic esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:2965–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Palanivelu C, Prakash A, Senthilkumar R, Senthilnathan P, Parthasarathi R, Rajan PS, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: Thoracoscopic mobilization of the esophagus and mediastinal lymphadenectomy in prone position–experience of 130 patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;203:7–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fabian T, Martin J, Katigbak M, McKelvey AA, Federico JA. Thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization during minimally invasive esophagectomy: a head-to-head comparison of prone versus decubitus positions. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:2485–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Feng M, Shen Y, Wang H, Tan L, Zhang Y, Khan MA, et al. Thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy: is the prone position a safe alternative to the decubitus position? J Am Coll Surg. 2012;214:838–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yatabe T, Kitagawa H, Yamashita K, Akimori T, Hanazaki K, Yokoyama M. Better postoperative oxygenation in thoracoscopic esophagectomy in prone positioning. J Anesth. 2010;24:803–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Luketich JD, Pennathur A, Awais O, Levy RM, Keeley S, Shende M, et al. Outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: review of over 1,000 patients. Ann Surg. 2012;256:95–103.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kinjo Y, Kurita N, Nakamura F, Okabe H, Tanaka E, Kataoka Y, et al. Effectiveness of combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy: comparison of postoperative complications and midterm oncological outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:381–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jarral OA, Purkayastha S, Athanasiou T, Darzi A, Hanna GB, Zacharakis E. Thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:2095–103.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ando N, Kato H, Igaki H, Shinoda M, Ozawa S, Shimizu H, et al. A randomized trial comparing postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil versus preoperative chemotherapy for localized advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus (jcog9907). Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:68–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Itami A, Watanabe G, Tanaka E, Nakayama S, Fujimoto A, Kondo M, et al. Multimedia article. Upper mediastinal lymph node dissection for esophageal cancer through a thoracoscopic approach. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:2741.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tanaka E, Okabe H, Tsunoda S, Obama K, Kan T, Kadokawa Y, et al. Feasibility of thoracoscopic esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2012;5:111–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Okabe H, Tanaka E, Tsunoda S, Obama K, Sakai Y. Intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis using a linear stapler following minimally invasive esophagectomy in the prone position. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013;17:397–402.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sato N, Koeda K, Ikeda K, Kimura Y, Aoki K, Iwaya T, et al. Randomized study of the benefits of preoperative corticosteroid administration on the postoperative morbidity and cytokine response in patients undergoing surgery for esophageal cancer. Ann Surg. 2002;236:184–90.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pelosi P, Croci M, Calappi E, Mulazzi D, Cerisara M, Vercesi P, et al. Prone positioning improves pulmonary function in obese patients during general anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 1996;83:578–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Blanch L, Mancebo J, Perez M, Martinez M, Mas A, Betbese AJ, et al. Short-term effects of prone position in critically ill patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Intensive Care Med. 1997;23:1033–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fridrich P, Krafft P, Hochleuthner H, Mauritz W. The effects of long-term prone positioning in patients with trauma-induced adult respiratory distress syndrome. Anesth Analg. 1996;83:1206–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chatte G, Sab JM, Dubois JM, Sirodot M, Gaussorgues P, Robert D. Prone position in mechanically ventilated patients with severe acute respiratory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997;155:473–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yatabe T, Kitagawa H, Yamashita K, Hanazaki K, Yokoyama M. Comparison of the perioperative outcome of esophagectomy by thoracoscopy in the prone position with that of thoracotomy in the lateral decubitus position. Surg Today. 2013;43:386–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yoshida N, Watanabe M, Baba Y, Iwagami S, Ishimoto T, Iwatsuki M, et al. Risk factors for pulmonary complications after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Surg Today. 2014;44:526–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eiji Tanaka
    • 1
  • Hiroshi Okabe
    • 1
  • Yousuke Kinjo
    • 1
  • Shigeru Tsunoda
    • 1
  • Kazutaka Obama
    • 1
  • Shigeo Hisamori
    • 1
  • Yoshiharu Sakai
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Surgery, Graduate School of MedicineKyoto UniversitySakyo-Ku, KyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations