Surgery Today

, Volume 44, Issue 8, pp 1490–1495 | Cite as

A cystic duct with no visible signal on magnetic resonance cholangiography is associated with laparoscopic difficulties: an analysis of 695 cases

  • Yasuhito Shimizu
  • Taiichi Otani
  • Jun Matsumoto
  • Kijuro Takanishi
  • Tomohito Minami
  • Hiroko Tsunoda
  • Masaru Miyazaki
Original Article
  • 132 Downloads

Abstract

Background/aims

We investigated the association between the magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) results and surgical difficulties and bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).

Methods

MRC was performed on 695 consecutive patients before LC. We divided the patients into two groups (visible cystic duct group and “no signal” cystic duct on MRC group) and compared them with regard to the length of the operation, conversion rate to open cholecystectomy (OC) and rate of bile duct injury.

Results

The “no signal” cystic duct on MRC group had a longer operation and higher rate of conversion to OC compared with the visible cystic duct group. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the occurrence rate of bile duct injury between the two groups.

Conclusions

The “no signal” cystic duct on MRC group was associated with laparoscopic difficulties, but not with an increased rate of biliary injury. When a visible cystic duct is not observed on MRC an early conversion to open surgery may avoid a bile duct injury during LC.

Keywords

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy Laparoscopic difficulties Bile duct injury Magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) 

Abbreviations

LC

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy

OC

Open cholecystectomy

MRC

Magnetic resonance cholangiography

HASTE

Half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo

CHD

Common hepatic duct

References

  1. 1.
    Perissat J, Collet DR, Belliard R. Gallstones: laparoscopic treatment, intracorporeal lithotripsy followed by cholecystostomy or cholecystectomy—a personal technique. Endoscopy. 1989;21(Suppl 1):373–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Reddick EJ, Olsen DO. Laparoscopic laser cholecystectomy: a comparison with minilap cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 1989;3:131–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Davidoff AM, Pappas TN, Murray EA, Hilleeren DJ, Johnson RD, Baker ME, et al. Mechanisms of major biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg. 1992;215:196–202.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Asbun HI, Rossi RL, Lowell JA, Munson JL. Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: mechanism of injury, prevention, and management. World J Surg. 1993;17:547–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Strasberg SM, Hertl M, Soper NJ. An analysis of problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 1995;180:101–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Adamsen S, Hansen OH, Funch-Jensen P, Schulze S, Stage JG, Wara P. Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective nationwide series. J Am Coll Surg. 1997;184:571–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Melton GB, Lillemoe KD, Cameron JL, Sauter PA, Coleman J, Yeo CJ. Major bile duct injuries associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg. 2002;235:888–95.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Garden OJ. Iatrogenic injury to bile duct. Br J Surg. 1991;78:1412–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    The Southern Surgeons Club. A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:1073–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Caputo L, Aitken DR, Mackett MC, Robles AE. Iatrogenic bile duct injuries. The real incidence and contributing factors-implications for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am Surg. 1992;58:766–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Roslyn JJ, Binns GS, Hughes EF, Saunders-Kirkwood K, Zinner MJ, Cates JA. Open cholecystectomy: a contemporary analysis of 42,474 patients. Ann Surg. 1993;218:129–37.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kakita A. Management and surgical result of the intraoperative bile duct injury. In: 27th annual meeting of Japanese Society of Biliary Surgery. 1998.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fletcher DR, Hobbs MST, Tan P, Valinsky LJ, Hockey RL, Pikora TJ, et al. Complications of cholecystectomy: risks of the laparoscopic approach and protective effects of operative cholangiography. A population-based study. Ann Surg. 1999;229:449–57.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Davidoff AM, Pappas TN, Murray EA, Hilleren DJ, Johnson RD, Baker ME, et al. Mechanisms of major biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecysectomy. Ann Surg. 1992;215:196–202.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wallner BK, Schumacher KA, Weidenmaier W, Friedrich JM. Dilated biliary tract: evaluation with a T2-weighted contrast-enhanced fast sequence. Radiology. 1991;181:805–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dooms GC, Fisher MR, Higgins CB, Hricak H, Goldberg HI, Margulis AR. MR imaging of the dilated biliary tract. Radiology. 1986;158:337–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Taourel P, Bret PM, Reinhold C, Barkun AN, Atri M. Anatomic variants of the biliary tree: diagnosis with MR cholangiopancreatography. Radiology. 1996;199:521–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kune GA. The influence of structure and function in the surgery of the biliary tract. Arris and Gale Lecture, April, 1970. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1970;47:78–91.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shaw MJ, Dorsher PJ, Vennes JA. Cystic duct anatomy: an endoscopic perspective. Am J Gastroenterol. 1993;88:2102–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dohke M, Watanabe Y, Okumura A, Amoh Y, Oda K, Ishimori T, et al. Anomalies and anatomic variants of the biliary tree revealed by MR cholangiopancreatography. AJR. 1999;173:1251–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Deziel DJ, Millikan KW, Economou SG, Doolas A, Sung-Tao Ko, Airan MC. Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a national survey of 4,292 hospitals and an analysis of 77,604 cases. Am J Surg. 1993;165:9–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bismuth H. Postoperative strictures of biliary tract. In: Blumgart LH, editor. The biliary.tract. Clinical surgery international, vol. 5. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1983. p. 209–18.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Johnson SR, Koehler A, Pennington LK, Hanto DW. Long-term results of surgical repair of bile duct injuries following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgery. 2000;128:668–77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Schmidt SC, Langrehr JM, Raakow R, Klupp J, Steinmüller T, Neuhaus P. Right hepatic lobectomy for recurrent cholangitis after combined bile duct and right hepatic artery injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a report of two cases. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2002;387:183–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Joshi RM, Shetty TS, Singh R, Adhikari, Patil BP, Bhange SA. Biliary complications of cholecystectomy. Int Surg. 2008;93:251–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nordin A, Halme L, Mäkisalo H, Isoniemi H, Höckerstedt K. Liver Transpl. 2002;8:1036–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Nordin A, Halme L, Mäkisalo H, Isoniemi H, Höckerstedt K. Management and outcome of major bile duct injuries after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: from therapeutic endoscopy to liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2002;8:1036–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yan JQ, Peng CH, Shen BY, Zhou GW, Yang WP, Chen YJ, Li HW. Liver transplantation as a treatment for complicated bile duct injury. Hepatogastroenterology. 2011;58:8–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Yamashita Y, Kurohiji T, Hayashi J, Kimitsuki H, Hiraki M, Kakegawa T. Intraoperative ultrasonography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1993;3:167–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Otani T, Maruyama Y, Shinkai H, Kawamura Y, Ri M, Kitagawa T, Kaji T, Makuuchi M. A miniature probe enables clear demonstration of the cystic duct during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 1998;12:1186–8 (Erratum 1999;13:440).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    O’Reilly DA, Otani T, Kingsnorth AN. Acute pancreatitis-pathophysiology. In: Aljafri AM, Kingsnorth AN, editors. Advanced surgical practice. 1st ed. London: Greenwich Medical Media; 2002. p. 89–95.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yasuhito Shimizu
    • 1
    • 3
  • Taiichi Otani
    • 1
    • 4
  • Jun Matsumoto
    • 1
  • Kijuro Takanishi
    • 1
  • Tomohito Minami
    • 1
  • Hiroko Tsunoda
    • 2
  • Masaru Miyazaki
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryTokyo Metropolitan Tama Medical HospitalTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyTokyo Metropolitan Tama Medical HospitalTokyoJapan
  3. 3.Department of SurgeryChiba Municipal Aoba HospitalChibaJapan
  4. 4.Health Care CenterAsahikawa Red Cross HospitalAsahikawaJapan
  5. 5.Department of General Surgery, Graduate School of MedicineChiba UniversityChibaJapan

Personalised recommendations