Nasal MRSA screening for surgical patients: predictive value for postoperative infections caused by MRSA
Postoperative methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections are occasionally fatal. We hypothesized that nasal MRSA screening might predict the risk of postoperative MRSA infections. The aim of the current study was to elucidate the relationship between the positivity of nasal MRSA screening and postoperative MRSA infections.
Six hundred and fourteen surgical patients who were admitted to the intensive care unit and underwent nasal MRSA screening between April 2006 and March 2011 were divided into MRSA-positive and -negative groups. The incidence of postoperative MRSA infections in the MRSA-positive and MRSA-negative groups were compared, and various risk factors for MRSA infections were evaluated.
The incidence of postoperative MRSA infections, such as pneumonia and enteritis, in the MRSA-positive group was significantly higher than that in the MRSA-negative group (41.9 vs. 3.1 %). The significant independent risk factors for postoperative MRSA infections were a positive MRSA screening, an operation lasting more than 300 min and an emergency operation. A positive MRSA screening was the most statistically significant risk factor for postoperative MRSA pneumonia and enteritis, but was not a risk factor for MRSA surgical site infections.
Nasal MRSA screening can help to identify patients who have an increased risk of developing postoperative MRSA infections, and would enable physicians to take a prompt action if these complications occur.
KeywordsMRSA Screening Surgery Postoperative complication
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflict of interest with regard to the contents of this manuscript.
- 13.Wernitz MH, Keck S, Swidsinski S, Schulz S, Veit SK. Cost analysis of a hospital-wide selective screening programme for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) carriers in the context of diagnosis related groups (DRG) payment. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2005;11:466–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Gavalda L, Masuet C, Beltran J, Garcia M, Garcia D, Sirvent JM, et al. Comparative cost of selective screening to prevent transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), compared with the attributable costs of MRSA infection. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2006;27:1264–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Felten A, Grandry B, Lagrange PH, Casin I. Evaluation of three techniques for detection of low-level methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): a disk diffusion method with cefoxitin and moxalactam, the vitek 2 system, and the MRSA-screen latex agglutination test. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40:2766–71.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Flayhart D, Hindler JF, Bruckner DA, Hall G, Shrestha RK, Vogel SA, et al. Multicenter evaluation of BBL CHROM- agar MRSA medium for direct detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from surveillance cultures of the anterior nares. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43:5536–40.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Wikler MA, Cockerill FR, Craig WA, Dudley MN, Eliopoulos GM, Hecht DW, et al. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; 17th informational supplement. Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) document M100-S17. Wayne Pennsylvania: CLSI; 2007. p. 44–51, p. 110–15.Google Scholar
- 24.Garvin KL, Konigsberg BS. Infection following total knee arthroplasty prevention and management. J Bone Jt Surg. 2011;93:1167–75.Google Scholar
- 29.Kohno S, Watanabe A, Matsushima T, HAP Study Group. Nationwide multicenter survey on the pathophysiology of hospital-acquired pneumonia and the use of first-line antibiotics in Japan: Evaluation of clinical position of meropenem in the initial therapy of hospital-acquired pneumonia. Jpn J Chemother. 2006;54:453–64 (Japanese).Google Scholar
- 32.Kalmeijer MD, Coertjens H, van Nieuwland-Bollen PM, Bogaers-Hofman D, de Baere GA, Stuurman A, et al. Surgical site infection in orthopedic surgery: the effect of mupirocin nasal ointment in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;35:353–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 36.Kuda T, Tateyama M, Saito A, Kuniyoshi Y, Koja K. Role of mupirocin in cases of cardiovascular surgery. Jpn Environ Infect. 2003;18:232–4 (Japanese).Google Scholar
- 37.Suzuki R, Uchida J, Azumi C, Aono H, Nanba T, Takeda A. Preoperative decolonization of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus prevents postoperative nosocomial MRSA infection in patients scheduled for major surgeries. Jpn ICU CCU. 2005;29:553–6 (Japanese).Google Scholar
- 40.Ngian KS, Nambiar R. Major surgery in the elderly: a study of outcome in 295 consecutive cases. Sing Med J. 1989;30:339–42.Google Scholar
- 43.Thannni LO, Aigoro NO. Surgical site infection complicating internal fixation of fractures: incidence and risk factors. J Natl Med Assoc. 2004;96:1070–2.Google Scholar
- 46.Hardin WD, Nichols RL. Aseptic technique in the operating room. In: Fry DE, editor. Surgical infections. Boston: Little, Brown and Co; 1995. p. 109–18.Google Scholar
- 48.Morikoshi E, Satou N, Mukai S, Saitou M, Tamegai Y. Clinical studies of postoperative MRSA infectious disease. With special reference to the cause and countermeasures. Jpn J Clin Surg. 1992;53:1507–15 (Japanese).Google Scholar