Advertisement

Surgery Today

, 41:787 | Cite as

Assessing a clinical pathway to improve the quality of care in pulmonary resections

  • Fumihiro Shoji
  • Tokujiro Yano
  • Akira Haro
  • Tsukihisa Yoshida
  • Kensaku Ito
  • Yosuke Morodomi
  • Yoshifumi Wakata
  • Yoshihiko Maehara
Original Article
  • 195 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy of the current clinical pathway for pulmonary resections.

Methods

This study examined variances from expected clinical pathway outcomes for pulmonary resections performed between 2005 and 2009. Data on a total of 383 patients were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

The median length of hospital stay (LOS) using the clinical pathway was 12 days (range: 1–188 days); the mean LOS was 15.5 days. The cost per day with use of the clinical pathway was 102 726 yen. Poor control of pain from intercostal neuralgia was the most frequently observed variance from expected outcomes. It affected 119 of 168 electronic clinical pathway patients (70.8%). The clinical pathway was terminated in 3.9% of patients (15/383) due to serious or life-threatening complications.

Conclusions

This study showed the single institutional experience of the clinical pathway for pulmonary resections. These findings indicate a need to revise certain aspects of the pathway, based on data from our analysis of variances.

Key words

Clinical pathway Pulmonary resection Variance analysis 

References

  1. 1.
    Wright CD, Wain JC, Grillo JC, Moncure AC, Macaluso SM, Mathisen DJ. Pulmonary lobectomy patient care pathway: a model to control cost and maintain quality. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;64:299–302.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Maruyama R, Miyake T, Kojo M, Aoki Y, Suemitsu R, Okamoto T, et al. Establishment of a clinical pathway as an effective tool to reduce hospitalization and charges after video-assisted thoracoscopic pulmonary resection. Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006;54:387–390.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Okita A, Yamashita M, Abe K, Nagai C, Matsumoto A, Akehi M, et al. Variance analysis of a clinical pathway of video-assisted single lobectomy for lung cancer. Surg Today 2009;39:104–109.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hyett KL, Podosky M, Santamaria N, Ham JC. Valuing variance: the importance of variance analysis in clinical pathways utilization. Aust Health Rev 2007;31:565–570.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yano T, Shoji F, Koga T. Is oxygen supplementation needed after standard pulmonary resection for primary lung cancer? Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006;12:393–396.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    DiJerome L. The nursing case management computerized system: meeting the challenge of health care delivery through technology. Comput Nurs 1992;10:250–258.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wakamiya S, Yamauchi K. What are the standard functions of electronic clinical pathway? Int J Med Inform 2009;78:543–550.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Okada O, Ohboshi N, Kuroda T, Nagase K, Yoshihara H. Electronic clinical path system based on semistructured data model using personal digital assistant for onsite access. J Med Syst 2005;29:379–389.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fumihiro Shoji
    • 1
  • Tokujiro Yano
    • 1
  • Akira Haro
    • 1
  • Tsukihisa Yoshida
    • 1
  • Kensaku Ito
    • 1
  • Yosuke Morodomi
    • 1
  • Yoshifumi Wakata
    • 2
  • Yoshihiko Maehara
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical SciencesKyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan
  2. 2.Department of Medical InformaticsKyushu University HospitalFukuokaJapan

Personalised recommendations