Advertisement

Surgery Today

, Volume 39, Issue 7, pp 580–586 | Cite as

Comparison of Karydakis flap reconstruction versus primary midline closure in sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease: Results of 200 military service members

  • Mehmet Fatih Can
  • Mert Mahsuni Sevinc
  • Mehmet Yilmaz
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

There is a high incidence of sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease (SPD) among young males. Despite increasing data on the treatment of SPD, no standard treatment has yet been established. The goal of this study was to compare the Karydakis flap reconstruction with a primary midline closure (PMC) in the treatment of patients with SPD.

Methods

The study included 200 patients treated over a period of 30 months. After a power analysis, the study was run on a two-directional basis (both retrospective reviews of patient charts and a telephone interview for prospective evaluation). The surgical findings, complications, recurrence rates, and degree of satisfaction based on a questionnaire were assessed.

Results

The duration of the surgery was longer in the Karydakis group. Complications were more frequently seen in the PMC group. The recurrence rate was 4.6% for the Karydakis group and 18.4% for the PMC group. Of patients who underwent the Karydakis operation, 70.8% were completely satisfied with the procedure, while only 32.6% of patients who underwent the PMC reported excellent satisfaction. A significantly higher number of patients in the Karydakis group recommended the same procedure to other patients with SPD.

Conclusion

The Karydakis method may be a preferable option in the treatment of SPD, due to the low rate of recurrence and the promising satisfaction rates.

Key words

Pilonidal sinus disease Karydakis method Primary closure 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    McGuinness JG, Winter DC, O’Connell PR. Vacuum-assisted closure of a complex pilonidal sinus. Dis Colon Rectum 2003;46:274–276.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    de Jaestecker J, Mann BD, Castellanos AE, Straus J. Pilonidal disease; 2006. URL: http://www.emedicine.com/med/byname/pilonidal-disease.htm. Accessed October 9, 2007.
  3. 3.
    Akinci OF, Bozer M, Uzunkoy A, Duzgun SA, Coskun A. Incidence and aetiological factors in pilonidal sinus among Turkish soldiers. Eur J Surg 1999;165:339–342.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Armstrong JH, Barcia PJ. Pilonidal sinus disease. The conservative approach. Arch Surg 1994;129:914–917.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rabie ME, Al Refeidi AA, Al Haizaee A, Hilal S, Al Ajmi H, Al Amri AA. Sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease: sinotomy versus excisional surgery, a retrospective study. Aust N Z J Surg 2007;77:177–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kaymakcioglu N, Yagci G, Simsek A, Unlu A, Tekin OF, Cetiner S, et al. Treatment of pilonidal sinus by phenol application and factors affecting the recurrence. Tech Coloproctol 2005;9:21–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chintapatla S, Safarani N, Kumar S, Haboubi N. Sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus: historical review, pathological insight and surgical options. Tech Coloproctol 2003;7:3–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hosseini SV, Bananzadeh AM, Rivaz M, Sabet B, Mosallae M, Pourahmad S, et al. The comparison between drainage, delayed excision and primary closure with excision and secondary healing in management of pilonidal abscess. Int J Surg 2006;4:228–231.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Aldemir M, Kara IH, Erten G, Taçyildiz I. Effectiveness of collagenase in the treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease. Surg Today 2003;33:106–109.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Füzün M, Bakir H, Soylu M, Tansugǧ T, Kaymak E, Haŕmanciogǧlu O. Which technique for treatment of pilonidal sinus — open or closed? Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:1148–1150.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Topgül K, Ozdemir E, Kiliç K, Gökbayir H, Ferahkösşe Z. Longterm results of limberg flap procedure for treatment of pilonidal sinus: a report of 200 cases. Dis Colon Rectum 2003;46:1545–1548.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mentes BB, Leventoglu S, Cihan A, Tatlicioglu E, Akin M, Oguz M. Modified Limberg transposition flap for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus. Surg Today 2004;34:419–423.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mentes O, Bagci M, Bilgin T, Coskun I, Ozgul O, Ozdemir M. Management of pilonidal sinus disease with oblique excision and primary closure: results of 493 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 2006;49:104–108.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Karydakis GE. Easy and successful treatment of pilonidal sinus after explanation of its causative process. Aust N Z J Surg 1992;62:385–389.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chijiwa T, Suganuma T, Takigawa T, Edogawa S, Inoue K, Yanagida S, et al. Pilonidal sinus in Japan maritime self-defense force at Yokosuka. Mil Med 2006;171:650–652.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Karydakis GE. New approach to the problem of pilonidal sinus. Lancet 1973;2:1414–1415.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Morden P, Drongowski RA, Geiger JD, Hirschl RB, Teitelbaum DH. Comparison of Karydakis versus midline excision for treatment of pilonidal sinus disease. Pediatr Surg Int 2005;21:793–796.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    McCallum I, King PM, Bruce J. Healing by primary versus secondary intention after surgical treatment for pilonidal sinus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;17(4):CD006213.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Søndenaa K, Nesvik I, Andersen E, Søreide JA. Recurrent pilonidal sinus after excision with closed or open treatment: final result of a randomised trial. Eur J Surg 1996;162:237–240.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Iesalnieks I, Fürst A, Rentsch M, Jauch KW. Primary midline closure after excision of a pilonidal sinus is associated with a high recurrence rate. Chirurg 2003;74:461–468.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Keshava A, Young CJ, Rickard MJ, Sinclair G. Karydakis flap repair for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease: how important is technique? Aust N Z J Surg 2007;77:181–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kitchen PR. Pilonidal sinus: experience with the Karydakis flap. Br J Surg 1996;83:1452–1455.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Akinci OF, Coskun A, Uzunköy A. Simple and effective surgical treatment of pilonidal sinus: asymmetric excision and primary closure using suction drain and subcuticular skin closure. Dis Colon Rectum 2000;43:701–706.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sakr M, Habib M, Shaheed AA. Assessment of Karydakis Technique as compared with midline closure for the management of chronic pilonidal sinus. J Pelvic Med Surg 2006;12:201–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Petersen S, Koch R, Stelzner S, Wendlandt TP, Ludwig K. Primary closure techniques in chronic pilonidal sinus: a survey of the results of different surgical approaches. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45:1458–467.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gurer A, Gomceli I, Ozdogan M, Ozlem N, Sozen S, Aydin R. Is routine cavity drainage necessary in Karydakis flap operation? A prospective, randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48:1797–1799.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Iriz E, Erer D, Koksal P, Ozdogan ME, Halit V, Sinci V, et al. Corpus sterni reinforcement improves the stability of primary sternal closure in high-risk patients. Surg Today 2007;37:197–201.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Shinohara T, Tsuda M. Successful sequential sac ligation for an unruptured giant omphalocele: report of a case. Surg Today 2006;36:707–709.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kim DI, Moon JY, Lee CH, Kim DY, Jang YS, Kim GM, et al. Primary closure after a carotid endarterectomy. Surg Today 2007;37:187–191.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gencosmanoglu R, Inceoglu R. Modified lay-open (incision, curettage, partial lateral wall excision and marsupialization) versus total excision with primary closure in the treatment of chronic sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus: a prospective, randomized clinical trial with a complete two-year follow-up. Int J Colorectal Dis 2005;20:415–422.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kement M, Oncel M, Kurt N, Kaptanoglu L. Sinus excision for the treatment of limited chronic pilonidal disease: results after a medium-term follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum 2006;49:1758–1762.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ertan T, Koc M, Gocmen E, Aslar AK, Keskek M, Kilic M. Does technique alter quality of life after pilonidal sinus surgery? Am J Surg 2005;190:388–392.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Søndenaa K, Diab R, Nesvik I, Gullaksen FP, Kristiansen RM, Saebø A, et al. Influence of failure of primary wound healing on subsequent recurrence of pilonidal sinus. Combined prospective study and randomised controlled trial. Eur J Surg 2002;168:614–618.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kulacoglu H, Dener C, Tumer H, Aktimur R. Total subcutaneous fistulectomy combined with Karydakis flap for sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease with secondary perianal opening. Colorectal Dis 2006;8:120–123.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mehmet Fatih Can
    • 1
    • 2
  • Mert Mahsuni Sevinc
    • 1
  • Mehmet Yilmaz
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryArdahan Army Community HospitalArdahanTurkey
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryGulhane School of MedicineAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations