Advertisement

An in-depth assessment of diabetes-related lower extremity amputation rates 2000–2013 delivered by twenty-one countries for the data collection 2015 of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)

  • Fabrizio CarinciEmail author
  • Luigi Uccioli
  • Massimo Massi Benedetti
  • Nicolaas Sieds Klazinga
Original Article
  • 16 Downloads

Abstract

Background

International comparisons of diabetes-related lower extremity amputation rates are still hampered by different criteria used for data collection and analysis. We aimed to evaluate trends and variation of major/minor amputations, using agreed definitions adopted by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development in 2015.

Methods

Direct age–sex standardized rates were calculated per 100,000 subjects per year between 2000 and 2013, using major/minor amputations with diabetes diagnosis as numerators and the total population or number of people with diabetes as denominators. Longitudinal trends were investigated using generalized estimating equations.

Results

Twenty-one countries reported major amputations referred to the general population, showing a mean reduction from 10.8 to 7.5 per 100,000 (− 30.6%). Eleven countries also reported major amputations among people with diabetes, showing a mean reduction from 182.9 to 128.3 per 100,000 (− 29.8%). Minor amputations remained stable over the study period. Longitudinal trends showed a significant average annual decrease of − 0.19 per 100,000 in the general population (95% CI − 0.36 to − 0.02; p = .03) and − 4.52 per 100,000 among subjects with diabetes (95% CI − 6.09 to − 2.94; p < .001). The coefficient of variation of major amputation rates between countries was fairly high (64%—in the total population, 67% among people with diabetes).

Conclusions

The study highlighted a clinically significant reduction of major amputations, in both the general population and among people with diabetes. The use of standardized definitions, while increasing the comparability of multinational data, highlighted remarkable differences between countries. These results can help identifying and sharing best practices effectively on a global scale.

Keywords

Lower extremity amputations in diabetes Healthcare Quality Indicators Diabetes care Health systems performance assessment Generalized estimating equations 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The conduction of this study has been made possible through in kind support offered by the Italian Ministry of Health, represented by F. Carle, Director of Office VI, Directorate of Health Policy and Planning, in collaboration with the Italian Agency for Regional Health Services (AGENAS). The new OECD standardized definitions applied in this paper have been delivered with the active contribution of the following members of the EUBIROD network: Jana Lepiksone (Centre for Disease Control, Latvia); Karianne Fjeld Loovas (Noklus, Norway), Scott Cunningham, (University of Dundee, Scotland); Zeliko Metelko (CrodiabNet, University of Zagreb, Croatia); Tamara Poljicanin (National Institute of Public Health, Croatia); Joseph Azzopardi (University of Malta, Malta); Przemka Jarosz-Chobot (Medical University of Silesia, Poland); Iztok Stotl (University of Ljubljana, Slovenia). The following members of the HCQI Expert Group participated to the targeted OECD R&D Study: Deirdre Mulholland and Grainne Cosgrove (Department of Health, Ireland); Yael Applbaum and Ziona Haklai (Ministry of Health, Israel); Hanne Narvulbold (Directorate of Health, Norway) and Veena Raleigh (The King’s Fund, England). The authors are particularly grateful to Ian Brownwood and Nelly Biondi from the OECD Health Division, for their continuous assistance with issues related to the OECD data collection.

Author’s contribution

FC, LU, MMB and NSK conceived and designed this study. FC designed the statistical analysis and analysed the data. FC, LU, MMB and NSK interpreted the results. FC wrote the first draft of the manuscript. FC, LU, MMB and NSK contributed to the writing of the manuscript. FC, LU, MMB and NSK agreed with the results and conclusions of the manuscript. All authors have read and confirmed that they met ICMJE criteria for authorship. All authors had full access to all of the data (including statistical reports and tables) in the study and can take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. FC is the guarantor. We attest that we have obtained appropriate permissions and paid any required fees for use of copyright protected materials.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Human and animal rights

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by the any of the authors.

Informed consent

All persons gave their informed consent prior to the inclusion in the study.

Supplementary material

592_2019_1423_MOESM1_ESM.docx (33 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 32 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Carinci F, Van Gool K, Mainz J et al (2015) Towards actionable international comparisons of health system performance: expert revision of the OECD framework and quality indicators. Int J Qual Health Care 27:137–146.  https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzv004 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stern JR, Wong CK, Yerovinkina M et al (2017) A meta-analysis of long-term mortality and associated risk factors following lower extremity amputation. Ann Vasc Surg 42:322–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hoffmann M, Kujath P, Flemming A et al (2015) Survival of diabetes patients with major amputation is comparable to malignant disease. Diabetes Vasc Dis Res 12:265–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carinci F, Massi Benedetti M, Klazinga NS, Uccioli L (2016) Lower extremity amputation rates in people with diabetes as an indicator of health systems performance. A critical appraisal of the data collection 2000–2011 by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Acta Diabetol 53(5):825–832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nicolucci A, Greenfield S, Mattke S (2006) Selecting indicators for the quality of diabetes care at the health systems level in OECD countries. Int J Qual Health Care 18(Suppl 1):26–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Forde I, Morgan D, Klazinga NS (2013) Resolving the challenges in the international comparison of health systems: the must do’s and the trade-offs. Health Policy 112(1–2):4–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rotar AM, van den Berg MJ, Kringos DS, Klazinga NS (2016) Reporting and use of the OECD Health Care Quality Indicators at national and regional level in 15 countries. Int J Qual Health Care 28(3):398–404.  https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzw027 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Carinci F, Di Iorio CT, Ricciardi W, Klazinga N, Verschuuren M (2011) Revision of the European Data Protection Directive: opportunity or threat for public health monitoring? Eur J Public Health 21(6):684–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Di Iorio CT, Carinci F, Oderkirk J (2014) Health Research and Systems’ Governance are at risk: Should the right to data protection override health? J Med Ethics 40(7):488–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Carinci F, Massi Benedetti M, Uccioli L et al (2014) Standardized definition and calculation of lower extremity amputation rates in diabetes for the OECD Health Care Quality Indicators project. Room document. In: 2nd OECD annual meeting of the HCQIGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    OECD (2015) Health at a Glance 2015: OECD Indicators. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/social-issues-migration-health/health-at-a-glance-2015_health_glance-2015-en. Accessed 06/01/2018
  12. 12.
    Carinci F, Di Stanislao F, Moirano F, Ceccolini C, Carle F, Bevere F (2014) Italy: geographic variations in health care. In: Geographic variations in health care: What do we know and what can be done to improve health system performance? OECD. http://www.keepeek.com/Digital-Asset-Management/oecd/social-issues-migration-health/geographic-variations-in-health-care_9789264216594-en#page287. Accessed 06/01/2018Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nicolucci A, Carinci F, Graepel J, Hohman T, Ferris R, Lachin JM (1996) The efficacy of tolrestat in the treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a meta-analysis of individual patient data. Diabetes Care 10:1091–1096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    R Development Core Team (2005) A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.R-project.org. Accessed 06/01/2018
  15. 15.
    Harding JL, Pavkov ME, Magliano DJ, Shaw JE, Gregg EW (2019) Global trends in diabetes complications: a review of current evidence. Diabetologia 62(1):3–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lombardo FL, Maggini M, De Bellis A, Seghieri G, Anichini R (2014) Lower extremity amputations in persons with and without diabetes in Italy: 2001–2010. PLoS ONE 9(1). https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0086405. Accessed 23 Sept 2019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jeffcoate W, Young B, Holman N (2012) The variation in incidence of amputation throughout England. Pract Diabetes 29(5):205–207aCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Li Y, Burrows NR, Gregg EW, Albright A, Geiss LS (2012) Declining rates of hospitalization for nontraumatic lower-extremity amputation in the diabetic population aged 40 years or older: U.S., 1988–2008. Diabetes Care 35(2):273–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Margolis DJ, Hoffstad O, Nafash J et al (2011) Location, location, location: geographic clustering of lower-extremity amputation among Medicare beneficiaries with diabetes. Diabetes Care 34(11):2363–2367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Vamos EP, Bottle A, Majeed A, Millett C (2010) Trends in lower extremity amputations in people with and without diabetes in England, 1996–2005. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 87(2):275–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Winell K, Venermo M, Ikonen T, Sund R (2013) Indicators for comparing the incidence of diabetic amputations: a nationwide population-based register study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 46(5):569–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kennon B, Leese GP, Cochrane L et al (2012) Reduced incidence of lower-extremity amputations in people with diabetes in Scotland: a nationwide study. Diabetes Care 35(12):2588–2590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Peterson A, Gudbjörnsdottir S, Löfgren UB et al (2015) Collaboratively improving diabetes care in Sweden using a national quality register: successes and challenges—a case study. Qual Manag Health Care 24(4):212–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    von Bonsdorff MB, von Bonsdorff ME, Haanpää M et al (2018) Work-loss years among people diagnosed with diabetes: a reappraisal from a life course perspective. Acta Diabetol 55(5):485–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jeffcoate WJ, Vileikyte L, Boyko EJ, Armstrong DG, Boulton AJM (2018) Current challenges and opportunities in the prevention and management of diabetic foot ulcers. Diabetes Care 41(4):645–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    OECD (2013) Health at a Glance 2017: OECD Indicators. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/social-issues-migration-health/health-at-a-glance-2017_health_glance-2017-en. Accessed 06/01/2018
  27. 27.
    Teti A, Gabrys L, Ziese T et al (2017) Proceedings of the international workshop ‘Development of a National Diabetes Surveillance System in Germany: Core Indicators and Conceptual Framework’, Berlin, Germany, 11–12/7 2016. BMC Proc. 11(Suppl 3):3Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Di Iorio CT, Carinci F, Brillante M et al (2013) Cross-border flow of health information: Is “privacy by design” enough? Privacy performance assessment in EUBIROD. Eur J Public Health 23(2):247–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cunningham SG, Carinci F, Brillante M et al (2016) Defining a European diabetes data dictionary for clinical audit and healthcare delivery: core standards of the EUBIROD project. Methods Inf Med 55(2):166–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Carinci F (2015) Essential levels of health information in Europe: an action plan for a coherent and sustainable infrastructure. 22. Health Policy 119(4):530–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia S.r.l., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Statistical SciencesUniversity of BolognaBolognaItaly
  2. 2.National Agency for Regional Health Services (AGENAS)RomeItaly
  3. 3.Department of Systems MedicineUniversità Tor VergataRomeItaly
  4. 4.Hub for International Health ReSearch (HIRS)PerugiaItaly
  5. 5.Health DivisionOrganisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)ParisFrance
  6. 6.Academic Medical CentreUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations