Advertisement

Clinical and socio-demographic determinants of inadequate self-care in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus: the leading role of self-care confidence

  • Rosario Caruso
  • Paola Rebora
  • Federica Dellafiore
  • Diletta Fabrizi
  • Barbara Riegel
  • Davide Ausili
  • Stefania Di Mauro
Original Article
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Health education and psycho-social aspects

Abstract

Aims

To describe self-care maintenance, monitoring, and management behaviors in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1DM), and to identify clinical and socio-demographic determinants of inadequate self-care.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted in two diabetes outpatient clinics in Italy. Clinical and socio-demographic characteristics were collected from the medical records of 181 consecutively enrolled T1DM patients. The Self-Care of Diabetes Inventory was used to measure self-care maintenance, self-care monitoring, self-care management and self-care confidence. A standardized 0–100 score was used for each self-care dimension. A score < 70 was considered inadequate self-care. Three multiple logistic regression models were run to find determinants of inadequate self-care maintenance, monitoring, and management.

Results

The majority of patients had adequate self-care maintenance (74%; n = 134), self-care monitoring (68.5%; n = 124) and self-care confidence (87.3%; n = 158), while self-care management was adequate for only a minority (34.8%; n = 63). The odds of inadequate self-care maintenance increased by 4.5 times when self-care confidence was inadequate (OR adjusted 4.589; 95% CI 1.611–13.071; p = 0.004). The odds of inadequate self-care monitoring increased four times when patients had inadequate self-care confidence (OR adjusted 4.116; 95% CI 1.457–11.628; p = 0.008). Inadequate self-care confidence increased the odds of performing inadequate self-care management more than five times (OR adjusted 5.313; 95% CI 1.143–24.686; p = 0.033).

Conclusions

Self-care management is commonly inadequate in adults with T1DM. Self-care confidence is the most important determinant of self-care behaviors in this population. Educational interventions are recommended to improve self-care confidence in adults with T1DM.

Keywords

Self-care Self-management Self-efficacy Diabetes mellitus Type 1 diabetes mellitus Risk factors Health education 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Human and animal rights

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Riegel B, Jaarsma T, Strömberg A (2012) A middle-range theory of self-care of chronic illness. Adv Nurs Sci 35:194–204.  https://doi.org/10.1097/ANS.0b013e318261b1ba CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Caruso R, Pittella F, Zaghini F et al (2016) Development and validation of the Nursing Profession Self-Efficacy Scale. Int Nurs Rev 63:455–464.  https://doi.org/10.1111/inr.12291 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Riegel B, Dickson VV, Faulkner KM (2016) The situation-specific theory of heart failure self-care. J Cardiovasc Nurs 31:226–235.  https://doi.org/10.1097/JCN.0000000000000244 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tomky D, Tomky D, Cypress M et al (2008) Aade position statement. Diabetes Educ 34:445–449.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0145721708316625 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chatterjee S, Davies MJ (2015) Current management of diabetes mellitus and future directions in care. Postgrad Med J 91:612–621.  https://doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2014-133200 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ausili D, Rossi E, Rebora P et al (2018) Socio-demographic and clinical determinants of self-care in adults with type 2 diabetes: a multicentre observational study. Acta Diabetol 55:691–702.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-018-1135-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    National Clinical Guideline Centre (2015) Type 1 diabetes in adults: diagnosis and management. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (UK), UKGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ausili D, Barbaranelli C, Rossi E et al (2017) Development and psychometric testing of a theory-based tool to measure self-care in diabetes patients: the Self-Care of Diabetes Inventory. BMC Endocr Disord 17:66.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-017-0218-y CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ausili D, Rebora P, Di Mauro S et al (2016) Clinical and socio-demographic determinants of self-care behaviours in patients with heart failure and diabetes mellitus: a multicentre cross-sectional study. Int J Nurs Stud 63:18–27.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJNURSTU.2016.08.006 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ausili D, Bulgheroni M, Ballatore P et al (2017) Self-care, quality of life and clinical outcomes of type 2 diabetes patients: an observational cross-sectional study. Acta Diabetol 54:1001–1008.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-017-1035-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lu Y, Xu J, Zhao W et al (2016) Measuring self-care in persons with type 2 diabetes. Eval Health Prof 39:131–184.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278715588927 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Caruso R, Arrigoni C, Magon A et al (2017) Health determinants in Italian type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients: a critical gender differences analysis. J Res Gend Stud 7:93–108.  https://doi.org/10.22381/JRGS7220176 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Caro-Bautista J, Martín-Santos FJ, Morales-Asencio JM (2014) Systematic review of the psychometric properties and theoretical grounding of instruments evaluating self-care in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Adv Nurs 70:1209–1227.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12298 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dormann CF, Elith J, Bacher S et al (2013) Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography 36:27–46.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07348.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Patterson CC, Dahlquist GG, Gyürüs E et al (2009) Incidence trends for childhood type 1 diabetes in Europe during 1989–2003 and predicted new cases 2005–20: a multicentre prospective registration study. Lancet 373:2027–2033.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60568-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Caruso R, Magon A, Baroni I et al (2018) Health literacy in type 2 diabetes patients: a systematic review of systematic reviews. Acta Diabetol 55:1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-017-1071-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Graffigna G, Barello S, Bonanomi A (2017) The role of patient health engagement model (PHE-model) in affecting patient activation and medication adherence: a structural equation model. PLoS One 12:e0179865.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179865 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Reddy M, Rilstone S, Cooper P, Oliver NS (2016) Type 1 diabetes in adults: supporting self management. BMJ 352:i998CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Powers MA, Bardsley J, Cypress M et al (2015) Diabetes self-management education and support in type 2 diabetes: a joint position statement of the American Diabetes Association, the American Association of Diabetes Educators, and the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Diabetes Care 38:1372–1382.  https://doi.org/10.2337/dc15-0730 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Monaghan M, Helgeson V, Wiebe D (2015) Type 1 diabetes in young adulthood. Curr Diabetes Rev 11:239–250CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gao J, Wang J, Zheng P et al (2013) Effects of self-care, self-efficacy, social support on glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes. BMC Fam Pract 2013 141 14:1090–1101.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-14-66 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia S.r.l., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Health Professions Research and Development UnitIRCCS Policlinico San DonatoSan Donato MilaneseItaly
  2. 2.Department of Medicine and SurgeryUniversity of Milano-BicoccaMonzaItaly
  3. 3.School of NursingUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations